Alexander v. Garland
Decision Date | 19 April 1923 |
Docket Number | 7 Div. 372. |
Parties | ALEXANDER v. GARLAND. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, De Kalb County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.
Action in trover by J. M. Garland against John Alexander. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Transferred from Court of Appeals under Acts 1911, p. 449, § 6. Reversed and remanded.
C. A. Wolfes, of Ft. Payne, for appellant.
Milo Moody, of Scottsboro, for appellee.
Trover for the conversion of a bale of cotton, instituted by Garland, a mortgagee of Boozer, who raised the cotton in 1920, against Alexander, who bought the cotton that fall from Boozer. There was judgment for plaintiff. Two errors are assigned. The defendant (appellant) sought to introduce in evidence a mortgage executed subsequently to Garland's mortgage, by Boozer to the Tennessee Valley Bank. On objection, this mortgage was excluded. The mortgage to the bank was irrelevant to any issue between the parties, Alexander not being shown to have been in any wise interested in or the holder of the mortgage to the bank, nor did he refer any dealing he had with this cotton to that mortgage. The first assignment of error is without merit.
It was shown without dispute that the cotton in question was raised on land rented by Jackson to Boozer; but there is no evidence that, at the time the mortgage of Boozer to appellee was executed, Boozer had then rented, or then had any interest in, the premises on which this cotton was grown. Without evidence tending to show that the mortgagor had a then present interest in the soil of which this cotton was a product, the plaintiff did not establish his right to recover for the alleged conversion of the cotton. 13 Mich. Dig. Ala. Rep. pp. 441, 442.
The appellant was erroneously refused the general affirmative charge requested for him.
Reversed and remanded.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sims v. United Auto Supply Co.
... ... Stewart v. Clemens, 220 ... Ala. 224, 124 So. 863; Avondale Mills v. Abbott ... Bros, 214 Ala. 368, 108 So. 31; Alexander v ... Garland, 209 Ala. 267, 96 So. 138; Sellers & Orum ... Co. v. Hardaway, 188 Ala. 388, 66 So. 460; Windham & ... Co. v. Stephenson, 156 Ala ... ...
-
Steele v. Brooks
... ... 545; Paden & Co v. Bellenger and Ralls, 87 Ala. 575, 6 ... So. 351; Johnson v. Coosa Mfg. Co., 16 Ala.App. 649, ... 81 So. 141; Alexander v. Garland, 209 Ala. 267, 96 ... In the ... trial below the plaintiff testified that at the time Sartin ... executed the ... ...
- Ex parte Jefferson Slag Co.