Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, 632
| Citation | 396 U.S. 19,90 S.Ct. 29,24 L.Ed.2d 19 |
| Decision Date | 29 October 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 632,632 |
| Parties | Beatrice ALEXANDER et al., Petitioners, v. HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al |
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
Jack Greenberg, New York City, for petitioners.
Louis F. Oberdorfer, Washington, D.C., for Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, as amicus curiae.
Jeris Leonard, Washington, D.C., A. F. Summer and John C. Satterfield, Jackson, Miss., for respondents.
This case comes to the Court on a petition for certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The petition was granted on October 9, 1969, and the case set down for early argument. The question presented is one of paramount importance, involving as it does the denial of fundamental rights to many thousands of school children, who are presently attending Mississippi schools under segregated conditions contrary to the applicable decisions of this Court. Against this background the Court of Appeals should have denied all motions for additional time because continued operation of segregated schools under a standard of allowing 'all deliberate speed' for desegregation is no longer constitutionally permissible. Under explicit holdings of this Court the obligation of every school district is to terminate dual school systems at once and to operate now and hereafter only unitary schools. Griffin v. County School Board, 377 U.S. 218, 234, 84 S.Ct. 1226, 1235, 12 L.Ed.2d 256 (1964); Green v. County School Board of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430, 438—439, 442, 88 S.Ct. 1689, 1694—1695, 1696, 20 L.Ed.2d 716 (1968). Accordingly,
It is hereby adjudged, ordered, and decreed:
1. The Court of Appeals' order of August 28, 1969, is vacated, and the case is remanded to that court to issue its decree and order, effective immediately, declaring that each of the school districts here involved may no longer operate a dual school system based on race or color, and directing that they begin immediately to operate as unitary school systems within which no person is to be effectively excluded from any school because of race or color.
2. The Court of Appeals may in its discretion direct the schools here involved to accept all or any part of the August 11, 1969, recommendations of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, with any modifications which that court deems proper insofar as those recommendations insure a totally unitary school system for all eligible pupils without regard to race or color.
The Court of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education, Civ. No. 68-1438-R.
...opportunity is of "paramount importance," and delays in vindicating that right are intolerable. Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, 396 U.S. 19, 20, 90 S.Ct. 29, 24 L.Ed. 2d 19 (1969); Carter v. West Feliciana Parish School Board, 396 U.S. 290, 90 S.Ct. 608, 24 L.Ed.2d 477 (Janua......
-
Crawford v. Board of Education
...U.S. at p. 13, 91 S.Ct. 1267) and has indicated that this obligation must be complied with 'at once.' (Alexander v. Board of Education (1969) 396 U.S. 19, 20, 90 S.Ct. 29, 24 L.Ed.2d 19; Carter v. West Feliciana School Bd. (1969) 396 U.S. 290, 291, 90 S.Ct. 608, 24 L.Ed.2d 477.) These prono......
-
San Francisco Unified School Dist. v. Johnson
...States Supreme Court has directed that segregation in public schools must terminate 'at once.' (Alexander v. Holmes Board of Education (1969) 396 U.S. 19, 20, 90 S.Ct. 29, 24 L.Ed.2d 19.) Since section 1009.5, under one interpretation, may delay desegregation, prompt judicial action is esse......
-
Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, Denver, Colo., Nos. 74-1349
...See, e. g., Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Educ., 402 U.S. 1, 91 S.Ct. 1267, 28 L.Ed.2d 554; Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Educ., 396 U.S. 19, 90 S.Ct. 29, 24 L.Ed.2d 19. In Keyes however, the Court confronted a different variety of intentional, system-wide segregation, to be......
-
PROCEDURAL LOSSES AND THE PYRRHIC VICTORY OF ABOLISHING QUALIFIED IMMUNITY.
...Id. at 807 & n. 112. (429.) See id. at 805-07; Davidson, supra note 384. (430.) See, e.g., Alexander v. Holmes Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 396 U.S. 19, 20 (1969) (per curiam) (ordering school districts "to terminate dual school systems at once and to operate now and hereafter only unitary (431.......
-
Race as identity caricature: a local legal history lesson in the salience of intraracial conflict.
...which no person is effectively excluded from any school because of race or color'" (quoting Alexander v. Holmes County Bd. of Educ., 396 U.S. 19, 20 (1969) (per (53) Calhoun v. Cook, 451 F.2d 583, 583-84 (5th Cir. 1971) (per curiam); see BAYOR, supra note 50, at 244-45 (noting the Fifth Cir......
-
The Supreme Court of the United States, 1969-1970
...by exercising the equal right tovote.&dquo; (P. 426.) Related cases decided this term. In Alexander v. Holmes County Board of f Education (396 U.S. 19; 90 S. Ct. 29) in a per curiam opinion the Court held thatcontinued operation of racially segregated schools under the standard of deliberat......
-
Legal Foundations of Civil Rights and Pluralism in America
...392 U.S. 409 (1968). of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, In- 17. 391 U.S. 430 (1968). corporated, 426 U.S. 668 (1976); Washington 18. 396 U.S. 19 ( v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229 (1976); and Milliken 19. 402 U.S. 1 (1971). v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974). 20. 413 U.S. 189 (1973). 22. 253 U.S. 4......