Alexander v. State
| Docket Number | CR-97-1412 |
| Decision Date | 30 May 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
9 cases
-
Jones v. State
...case. Allegations that are too vague and lack the requisite factual support do not support issuance of the writ. Alexander v. State , 2019 Ark. 171, 575 S.W.3d 401. Jones's claim is unclear. However, giving latitude to his reference in the attached exhibits to R.A.—who testified about an oc......
-
Dayong Yang v. City of Little Rock
... ... municipal immunity pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 21-9-301, which provides, (a) It is declared to be the public policy of the State of Arkansas that all counties, municipal corporations, school districts, public charter schools, special improvement districts, and all other ... ...
-
Stephenson v. State
...too vague and conclusory and lack the requisite factual support, and conclusory claims are not a ground for the writ. Alexander v. State , 2019 Ark. 171, 575 S.W.3d 401. Although Stephenson provides a witness list containing redacted information concerning all the named witnesses, he does n......
-
Jefferson v. State
...properly treats a request for permission to pursue audita querela relief as a petition for writ of error coram nobis. Alexander v. State , 2019 Ark. 171, 575 S.W.3d 401. Accordingly, it was not error for the circuit court to consider Jefferson's petition as a coram nobis petition. Although ......
Get Started for Free
