Alexander v. State, 6 Div. 195

Decision Date21 March 1967
Docket Number6 Div. 195
Citation204 So.2d 486,44 Ala.App. 143
PartiesHenry ALEXANDER v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

Longshore & Longshore, Birmingham, for appellant.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and John C. Tyson, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

Henry Alexander appeals from a conviction for the offense of robbery. He was sentenced to a term of ten years in the penitentiary.

According to the state's evidence, two men, one armed with a pistol, wearing a woman's wig and with a stocking over his face, entered the Montevallo Supermarket in Jefferson County, at about 8:30 p.m., January 30, 1965. After binding the owner, Mr. J. H. Lenon, a woman customer and a young girl, they took $200.00 from the cash register, leaving the parties bound on the floor behind the meat counter.

William Trimble and James Ward, Jr., being first advised of their constitutional rights and after consultation with counsel, testified to their participation in the robbery. Trimble drove the automobile and Ward and Walter Little entered the store and took the money.

Trimble and Ward testified the defendant was the planner and mastermind of the robbery; that he gave the keys to his automobile to Trimle so that he could drive the men to the store and bring them back after the robbery. Ward testified defendant gave him the pistol to use in the robbery. Both Trimble and Ward testified they took the money to defendant and he gave each of the three men a part of the money and kept the balance.

Ollie Vance, a detective with the Birmingham Police Department, testified, after proper predicate as to voluntariness, that defendant told him he had no knowledge of the robbery; that he was at the 'Brown Jug' working; that he had left his automobile at the Courthouse Service Station to have work done on it and about 7 p.m., he sent William Trimble to the service station for the car. Then he said Mr. Bill from the service station sent a man to the Brown Jug to see if it was all right to let William take the car. Defendant said Trimble took the car and he didn't see him anymore until 11:00 o'clock that night. Defendant said he got after him about being gone so long and William said, 'I will give you a little piece of money.' Defendant said, 'He gave me some bills and I just stuck it in my pocket at the time without counting it, due to the fact that some people were in the place of business.' He stated defendant denied ownership or knowledge of the pistol and said he had never seen it before.

State's witness Willie Mason identified the pistol in question as one he had seen the defendant with on several occasions at his place of business.

C. V. Garrett, a detective with the Birmingham Police Department, testified when he arrested Trimble, Ward and Little, one of the three pulled the pistol in question from under his coat and threw it in the alley. Ward had three stockings and Trimble had one stocking and a woman's wig in his pocket.

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Kimmons v. State, 4 Div. 509
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 1, 1977
    ...of whether the evidence sufficiently corroborated the accomplice has properly been presented to this court for review. Alexander v. State, 44 Ala.App. 143, 204 So.2d 486, cert. denied, 281 Ala. 451, 204 So.2d 488 (1967); Leonard v. State, 43 Ala.App. 454, 192 So.2d 461 (1966). We are theref......
  • Goulden v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 4, 1974
    ...the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. However, the record before us is unprotected. In the oft-cited case of Alexander v. State, 44 Ala.App. 143, 204 So.2d 486, Price, P.J. wrote: 'We are of opinion the record does not show corroboration of the testimony of the admitted accomplices......
  • Thomas v. State, 6 Div. 977
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • August 21, 1979
    ...of the evidence. In view of this, the weight and sufficiency of the evidence are not presented for our consideration. Alexander v. State, 44 Ala.App. 143, 204 So.2d 486, cert. denied with opinion, 281 Ala. 457, 204 So.2d 488, cert. denied, 390 U.S. 984, 88 S.Ct. 1107, 19 L.Ed.2d 1284; Georg......
  • Alexander v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • October 26, 1967
    ...HARWOOD, Justice. In support of appellant's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 44 Ala.App. 143, 204 So.2d 486, counsel for appellant-petitioner asserts that the Court of Appeals 'erred in holding it was without jurisdiction to reverse this caus......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT