Alexander v. United States
| Decision Date | 04 October 1993 |
| Docket Number | No. 91-1526.,91-1526. |
| Citation | 510 U.S. 909 |
| Parties | Alexander v. United States, 509 U. S. 544. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Petition for rehearing denied.JUSTICE GINSBURG took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
24 cases
-
People v. Foley
...by a law drawn with the requisite specificity" (New York v. Ferber, supra, at 769, 102 S.Ct. 3348; see, Alexander v. United States, 509 U.S. 544, 555, 113 S.Ct. 2766, 125 L.Ed.2d 441, reh. denied 510 U.S. 909, 114 S.Ct. 295, 126 L.Ed.2d The overbreadth doctrine is to be applied sparingly an......
-
State v. Jouppi
...139 S. Ct. 682, 689-90, 203 L.Ed.2d 11 (2019).13 Bajakajian , 524 U.S. at 327-28, 118 S.Ct. 2028 ; Alexander v. United States , 509 U.S. 544, 558-59, 113 S.Ct. 2766, 125 L.Ed.2d 441 (1993) ; Austin v. United States , 509 U.S. 602, 622, 113 S.Ct. 2801, 125 L.Ed.2d 488 (1993).14 Bajakajian , ......
-
L.M. v. Town of Middleborough
...no support for equating the provision with restrictions that have been deemed prior restraints, see Alexander v. United States, 509 U.S. 544, 553 n.2, 113 S.Ct. 2766, 125 L.Ed.2d 441 (1993), the contention is waived for lack of development, see United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 17 (1st ......
-
Book People, Inc. v. Wong
...certain communications when issued in advance of the time that such communications are to occur.' " Alexander v. United States, 509 U.S. 544, 550, 113 S.Ct. 2766, 125 L.Ed.2d 441 (1993) (quoting MELVILLE NIMMER, NIMMER ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH § 4.03 (1984)). A prior restraint, while not per se......
Get Started for Free