Alexandropoulos v. State

Decision Date27 October 1961
Citation174 A.2d 417,103 N.H. 456
PartiesWilliam ALEXANDROPOULOS et al. v. STATE of New Hampshire.
CourtNew Hampshire Supreme Court

Fuller, Flynn & Riordon and Thomas E. Flynn, Jr., Portsmouth, for plaintiffs.

Gardner C. Turner, Atty. Gen., William J. O'Neil and William F. Cann, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State of New Hampshire.

BLANDIN, Justice.

The plaintiffs in their brief say that the sole issue is whether the slope release and access rights passed to the defendant State under an alleged contract between them and the State so as to make the defendant liable under RSA 491:8.

This statute provides, so far as material, that 'the superior court shall have jurisdiction to enter judgment against the state of New Hampshire founded upon any express or implied contract with the state,' and that any action brought under this statute 'shall be tried by the court without a jury.' In the previous transfer of this dispute, the plaintiffs' petition for mandamus to compel the Commissioner of Public Works & Highways to build a service access road for them in accordance with the alleged contract hereinbefore referred to, was denied. Kostrelos v. Merrill, 101 N.H. 317, 143 A.2d 400. However, the Court in that opinion said: 'Whether any remedy is available to the plaintiffs under RSA 491:8 is a question not presented and which has therefore not been considered.' Id., 101 N.H. 320, 143 A.2d 403.

The main difficulty confronting us here is that the pleadings do not make it clear who allegedly made the contract with the plaintiffs. Their allegations are that the agreement was made by the State 'through its agents or servants.' Neither from the record in the present case nor from that in the previous transfer (Kostrelos v. Merrill, 101 N.H. 317, 143 A.2d 400) can we determine with certainty the identity of these alleged agents and servants. This question will have to be decided in the Superior Court, but in the interest of the efficient administration of justice, it seems advisable to resolve certain issues now.

The defendant rests its case upon the proposition that the Layout Commission had no authority to make any contract with the plaintiffs whereby the State should agree to construct an access or free road for their benefit in return for their release to the State of their slope rights, and that such powers reside only in the Commissioner of Public Works & Highways. This is correct. Kostrelos v. Merrill, supra, 101 N.H. 319, 143 A.2d 400; Wiseman v. State, 98 N.H. 393, 397, 101 A.2d 472; RSA 236:3-5. The mere fact that the Layout Commission purported to make an agreement, if it did, does not...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Spring v. Board of Trustees of Maine Public Employees Retirement System
    • United States
    • Maine Superior Court
    • June 9, 2011
    ... ... December 5, 2007, the defendant informed the plaintiff that ... she could purchase one year of out-of-state credits for ... service performed in another school system, which would count ... towards the years that she had acquired before July 1, ... ...
  • Spring v. Bd. of Trustees of Me. Pub. Employees Ret. Sys.
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • June 14, 2011
    ...authority to issue moratorium on sewer permits); Orange v. District of Columbia, 320 A.2d 301, 303 (D.C. 1974); Alexandropolous v. New Hampshire, 174 A.2d 417, 418 (N.H. 1961); Lien v. Northwestern Engineering Co., 54 N.W.2d 472, [476] (S.D. 1952); Dep't of Public Safety and Correctional Se......
  • Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services v. ARA Health Services, Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • September 1, 1994
    ...Ct.Cl.1975); Pacific Inter-Club Yacht Association v. Richards, 192 Cal.App.2d 616, 619, 13 Cal.Rptr. 730 (1961); Alexandropoulos v. State, 103 N.H. 456, 174 A.2d 417, 418 (1961); Lien v. Northwestern Engineering Co., 74 S.D. 476, 54 N.W.2d 472, 476 (1952); Appeal of Roadmix Construction Cor......
  • Armstrong v. Lake Tarleton Hotel Corp.
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • October 27, 1961
    ... ... from and including the 15th day of June, 1957 'until terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Law of the State of New Hampshire' RSA 281:36. She maintains that this is an award still in effect since it has not been modified by the Commissioner under section ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT