Alfonso v. State, 94-1732.
| Decision Date | 11 October 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. 94-1732.,94-1732. |
| Citation | 661 So.2d 308 |
| Parties | Gilberto ALFONSO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HUBBART, JORGENSON and COPE, JJ.
ON REHEARING
The defendant's motion for rehearing is granted, this court's opinion filed April 12, 1995, is vacated; the judgment of conviction and sentence entered below after a jury trial for attempted first-degree felony murder, as charged in count two of the information, is hereby reversed; and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to discharge the defendant from the cause as to this conviction and sentence only.
We reach this result based on the controlling and indistinguishable authority of State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1995) () 20 Fla. Law Weekly S204 (overruling Amlotte v. State, 456 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1984)), which held that there is no such crime in Florida as attempted first-degree felony murder. Specifically, we reject the state's contention that the subject conviction for attempted first-degree felony murder should be reduced to a lesser offense; we are unaware of any authority in Florida, and have been cited to none, which would authorize a trial or appellate court to reduce a conviction for a non-existent crime, as here, to a lesser offense.
As to the balance of the judgments of conviction and sentences under review, we affirm such judgments and sentences in all respects as they have not been challenged on appeal by the defendant.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.
The State moves for rehearing or certification, arguing that on remand there should either be a new trial on lesser included offenses or that the defendant's conviction for attempted first degree felony murder should be reduced to a lesser included offense. We cannot agree. We interpret the Florida Supreme Court's decision in State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1995), to require an outright reversal, rather than a reduction to a lesser included offense or a new trial on lesser included offenses. Moreover, we see no principled basis for such reduction or new trial because, as a matter of law, there can be no lesser...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jones v. State, 95-389
...1st DCA 1996); Pratt v. State, 668 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Lee v. State, 664 So.2d 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Alfonso v. State, 661 So.2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), cause dismissed, 665 So.2d 220 (Fla.1995), review granted, 668 So.2d 603 (Fla.1996).3 Because the trial judge did not base t......
-
Thompson v. State
...murder, this case differs from the recent cases of Lee v. State, 664 So.2d 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (question certified); Alfonso v. State, 661 So.2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (question certified), and Wilson v. State, 660 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (question certified). In those cases this c......
-
Gibson v. State, 94-3311
...and the available options, if any, upon remand, we certify the same question of great public importance raised in Alfonso v. State, 661 So.2d 308, 309 (Fla. 3d DCA) (on motion for rehearing and certification), cause dism., 665 So.2d 220 In affirming the convictions in Count I and Counts IV ......
-
Riggins v. State, 95-1463
...So.2d 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Lee v. State, 664 So.2d 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), review granted, 673 So.2d 30 (Fla.1996); Alfonso v. State, 661 So.2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), review granted, No. 86,739, 668 So.2d 603 (Fla. Jan. 30, 1996); Wilson v. State, 660 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), rev......