Alford v. Florida
| Decision Date | 06 July 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 74-6717,74-6717 |
| Citation | 96 S.Ct. 3227,428 U.S. 912,49 L.Ed.2d 1221 |
| Parties | Learie Leo ALFORD, petitioner, v. FLORIDA |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida.
Denied.
Petitioner contends that his right of confrontation, guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, was violated because the transcript of the preliminary hearing testimony of a material prosecution witness was read at his trial and the prosecution, although it was aware that the witness would leave Florida prior to the trial, failed to use available procedures to assure the witness' ppresence at trial or to depose the witness before the trial began. See Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719, 88 S.Ct. 1318, 20 L.Ed.2d 255 (1968). On the record in this case, we would grant certiorari and set the case for oral argument.
In any event, the imposition and carrying out the death penalty in this case constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 227, 96 S.Ct. 2971, 49 L.Ed.2d 904 (1976) (Brennan, J., dissenting); id., at 231, 96 S.Ct. 2973 (Marshall, J., dissenting). We would therefore grant certiorari and vacate the judgment in this case insofar as it leaves undisturbed the death sentence imposed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Westinghouse Elec. v. STATE OF MD. COM'N, ETC.
...... either because "the nature of the regulated subject matter permits no other conclusion, or because Congress has unmistakably so ordained." Florida Lime & Avocado Growers v. Paul, 373 U.S. 132, 142, 83 S.Ct. 1210, 1217, 10 L.Ed.2d 248 (1963). To hold otherwise would give judicial sanction to an, ......
-
Bundy v. State, 57772
...923, 96 S.Ct. 3234, 49 L.Ed.2d 1226 (1976) (strangulation); Alford v. State, 307 So.2d 433 (Fla.1975), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 912, 96 S.Ct. 3227, 49 L.Ed.2d 1221 (1976) (sexual Finally Bundy argues there was insufficient proof of nonconsensual entry to uphold the finding that a burglary had......
-
Pulley v. Harris
......2909, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (upholding Georgia's statutory scheme which required comparative proportionality review), and Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242, 96 S.Ct. 2960, 49 L.Ed.2d 913 (upholding Florida's scheme under which the appellate court performed proportionality review despite ...State, 322 So.2d 533, 540-541 (1975); Alford v. State, 307 So.2d 433, 445 (1975); Lamadline v. State, 303 So.2d 17, 20 (Fla.1974). As the Florida Supreme Court has itself recently stated: ......
-
Pollard v. Cockrell
......Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411, 84 S.Ct. 461, 11 L.Ed.2d 440 (1964), and Rankin v. State of Florida, 418 F.2d 482 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1039, 90 S.Ct. 1358, 25 L.Ed.2d 650 (1970). As we explained in Rankin, 418 F.2d at 485, the ......