Allard v. Allard
Decision Date | 31 January 2017 |
Docket Number | No. 308194,308194 |
Citation | 318 Mich.App. 583,899 N.W.2d 420 |
Parties | Earl H. ALLARD, Jr., Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Christine A. ALLARD, Defendant–Appellant. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US |
James N. McNally, St. Clair Shores, for plaintiff.
Gentry Nalley, PLLC (by Kevin S. Gentry ), Whitmore Lake, for defendant.
Rebecca Shiemke, Gail M. Towne, Kalamazoo, Liisa R. Speaker, Lansing, Anne L. Argiroff, Farmington Hills, and Judith A. Curtis, Grosse Pointe, for the Family Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, amici curiae.
Donald A. DeLong, Northville, James R. Cambridge, Detroit, Daniel H. Minkus, Birmingham, and Carey Law Offices, PC (by James L. Carey ), for the Business Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, amici curiae.
Before: M.J. Kelly, P.J., and Wilder and Fort Hood, JJ.
ON REMAND
This matter returns to us on remand from our Supreme Court. Allard v. Allard , 499 Mich. 932, 878 N.W.2d 888 (2016) ( Allard II ). We have been instructed to consider two issues on remand: "(1) whether parties may waive the trial court's discretion under MCL 552.23(1) and MCL 552.401 through an antenuptial agreement," and "(2) if so, whether the parties validly waived MCL 552.23(1) and MCL 552.401 in this case." Id. We conclude that parties cannot, by antenuptial agreement, deprive a trial court of its equitable discretion under MCL 552.23(1) and MCL 552.401. Accordingly, we vacate in part and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The pertinent facts on remand remain nearly identical to those set forth in our prior opinion:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Youmans v. Charter Twp. of Bloomfield
..."assumpsit" claims. "[E]quity regards and treats as done what in good conscience ought to be done." Allard v. Allard (On Remand) , 318 Mich. App. 583, 597, 899 N.W.2d 420 (2017) (quotation marks and citation omitted). Had plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment that certain costs included i......
-
Braswell Egg Co. v. Poultry Mgmt. Sys., Inc.
...Mid-Mich. Visiting Nurse Ass'n, No. 19-10402, 2020 WL 887897, at *3 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 24, 2020) (unpublished); Allard v. Allard, 318 Mich. App. 583, 601, 899 N.W.2d 420, 430 (2017). As for a time bar violating the law, Michigan courts consistently have "held that contractually shortened peri......
-
Cnty. of Ingham v. Mich. Cnty. Rd. Comm'n Self-Insurance Pool
...by a statute, or contracts in 329 Mich.App. 318 violation of public policy, are 942 N.W.2d 99 void." Allard v. Allard (On Remand) , 318 Mich. App. 583, 598, 899 N.W.2d 420 (2017) (quotation marks and citation omitted). See also Krause v. Boraks , 341 Mich. 149, 155, 67 N.W.2d 202 (1954) (ex......
-
In re Erpelding, 16-1419
...A.2d 705, 710 (1984) ; Massachusetts, Austin v. Austin , 445 Mass. 601, 839 N.E.2d 837, 840 (2005) ; Michigan, Allard v. Allard , 318 Mich.App. 583, 899 N.W.2d 420, 426–27 (2017) (noting Michigan statute allows parties to contract about "property" and holding "property" includes attorney fe......