Allen v. City of Bellingham
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | FULLERTON, J. |
| Citation | Allen v. City of Bellingham, 95 Wash. 12, 163 P. 18 (Wash. 1917) |
| Decision Date | 17 February 1917 |
| Docket Number | 13487. |
| Parties | ALLEN v. CITY OF BELLINGHAM et al. |
Department 1. Appeal from Superior Court, whatcom County; Augustus Brawley, Judge.
Action by A. L. Allen against the City of Bellingham and others. From judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Hurlbut & Neal, of Bellingham, for appellant.
Dan F North, Newman & Kindall, and C. W. Howard, all of Bellingham for respondents.
This is an action brought by A. L. Allen against the city of Bellingham and others, seeking to enjoin the city named from enforcing, or attempting to enforce, an ordinance of the city regulating the carrying of passengers on its streets in motor-propelled vehicles commonly known as jitney busses. A general demurrer to the complaint was interposed which the trial court sustained. The plaintiff elected to stand on the complaint and refused to plead further, whereupon the court entered a judgment to the effect that the plaintiff take nothing by his action. From the judgment so entered, this appeal is prosecuted.
As the case is presented to this court, the sole question involved is the validity of the ordinance the enforcement of which is sought to be enjoined. The appellant attacks the ordinance, not only as a whole, but upon a number of its several provisions as well, and we have found it convenient, notwithstanding its considerable length, to set it forth in full. The ordinance is as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Texas Co. v. Cohn
...in excise tax laws, this court has indicated that it does not regard competition as a circumstance of controlling significance. In Allen v. Bellingham, the validity of an ordinance of the of Bellingham, which placed a license, or occupation tax, upon the owners of jitney busses, was challen......
-
Weden v. San Juan County
...road closure this court noted "[e]very citizen of the state has an equal right to use the streets." Id.; cf. Allen v. City of Bellingham, 95 Wash. 12, 38, 163 P. 18 (1917) (wherein this court upheld a local ordinance regulating jitney busses because the ordinance regulated without prohibiti......
-
Certification from the U.S. Dist. Court for the W. Dist. of Wash. in Chong Yim v. City of Seattle
...of property: Abbey Rd. Grp., LLC v. City of Bonney Lake, 167 Wash.2d 242, 218 P.3d 180 (2009) (plurality opinion) Allen v. City of Bellingham, 95 Wash. 12, 163 P. 18 (1917) Amunrud v. Bd. of Appeals, 158 Wash.2d 208, 143 P.3d 571 (2006) Asarco, Inc. v. Dep’t of Ecology, 145 Wash.2d 750, 43 ......
-
Buck v. Kuykendall
...right to use them for his own private gain, even though such use be to carry over them people who desire the service.' In Allen v. Bellingham, 95 Wash. 12, 163 P. 18: the use to which the appellant proposes putting the streets is not the ordinary or customary use, but a special one. He purp......