Allen v. City of Macon, 43630

Decision Date10 June 1968
Docket NumberNo. 43630,No. 3,43630,3
CitationAllen v. City of Macon, 162 S.E.2d 783, 118 Ga.App. 88 (Ga. App. 1968)
PartiesMae ALLEN v. CITY OF MACON
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Robert F. Higgins, L. Z. Dozier, Macon, for appellant.

Harris, Russell & Watkins, Joseph H. Davis, Macon, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

DEEN, Judge.

No action for damages may be filed against a municipality unless written notice complying with the requirements of Code Ann. § 69-308 is first presented to the governing body within six months of the happening of the event upon which the claim is predicated. Written notice to the mayor will not suffice. City of Tallapoosa v. Brock, 138 Ga. 622, 75 S.E. 644. Oral notice to the mayor and city manager, together with written notice to the municipality which was five days late, will not suffice. Peek v. City of Albany, 101 Ga.App. 564, 114 S.E.2d 451. Oral notices followed by actual appearance before the mayor and council of the city in official session as its governing body, and their assurances of indemnification, will not suffice and cannot create an estoppel because these officials 'had no right to waive the requirements of Code Ann. § 69-308 that witten notice must be given a municipal corporation of any claim for money damages against it, within six months of the happening of the event upon which the claim is predicated.' City of Calhoun v. Holland, 222 Ga. 817, 152 S.E.2d 752.

In the present case the petition alleges that the plaintiff was injured through the negligence of an employee at the city hospital; that the city carried liability insurance; that written notice was given the claims manager of the insurer by plaintiff's attorney, who was advised that the company was investigating and they would try to work the matter out, and that an adjuster called on the plaintiff and made a written report. Oral notice was also given to hospital authorities. None of this amounts to written notice presenting the claim to the governing authority of the municipality, a condition precedent to this action.

The trial court did not err in dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

JORDAN, P.J., concurs specially.

PANNELL, J., concurs.

JORDAN, Presiding Judge (concurring specially).

I concur in the judgment solely because this court is bound by the strict application of Code Ann. § 69-308 as exemplified by City of Calhoun v. Holland, 222 Ga. 817, 152 S.E.2d 752, reversing Holland v. City of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Schaefer v. Mayor and Council of City of Athens
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 12, 1969
    ...City of Calhoun v. Holland, 222 Ga. 817, 152 S.E.2d 752; Peek v. City of Albany, 101 Ga.App. 564, 114 S.E.2d 451; Allen v. City of Macon, 118 Ga.App. 88, 162 S.E.2d 783, or from a reference of the claim to an insurance carrier which undertook an investigation and settlement, can not work a ......
  • Harris v. City of Chattanooga
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • February 5, 1981
    ...Georgia courts have not accepted actual notice as a substitute for the written notice prescribed by the statute. Allen v. City of Macon, 118 Ga.App. 88, 162 S.E.2d 783 (1968). With unswerving harshness, the courts have demanded strict compliance with the writing requirement. See, e. g., Cit......
  • Evans v. City of Covington
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 15, 1999
    ...required by OCGA § 36-33-5. City of LaGrange v. USAA Ins. Co., 211 Ga.App. 19, 20(1), 438 S.E.2d 137 (1993); Allen v. City of Macon, 118 Ga.App. 88, 89, 162 S.E.2d 783 (1968). 7. See Campbell v. City of Atlanta, 117 Ga.App. 824, 162 S.E.2d 213 (1968). 8. City of LaGrange, supra, 211 Ga.App.......
  • Buffalo Ins. Co. v. Star Photo Finishing Co., s. 44877
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 24, 1969
    ...Canada, 18 Ga.App. 461, 89 S.E. 533; Nalley v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co., 56 Ga.App. 555, 567, 193 S.E. 619, supra. Cf. Allen v. City of Macon, 118 Ga.App. 88, 162 S.E.2d 783; Schaefer v. Mayor & Council of Athens, 120 Ga.App. 301(6), 170 S.E.2d (e) There is no merit in the contention that Buff......
  • Get Started for Free