Allen v. State
Decision Date | 22 January 1980 |
Docket Number | 3 Div. 35 |
Citation | 382 So.2d 1147 |
Parties | Suzette ALLEN v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Calvin M. Whitesell, Montgomery, for appellant.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., Sarah Kathryn Farnell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Appellant was put to trial upon a two-count indictment which, omitting the formal parts, reads as follows:
Throughout the trial proceedings appellant was represented by counsel of her choice and at arraignment pleaded not guilty. The jury found her guilty under both counts of the indictment. In finding her guilty under Count II of the indictment the verdict reads: "We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of possession of marijuana for her personal use and refuse to assess a fine."
The trial court sentenced appellant to two years imprisonment in the penitentiary, suspended the sentence and placed her on five years probation conditioned upon her future good behavior. The Court further ordered that she serve three months in the County jail and pay a $1,000.00 fine and court costs. Another condition of her probation was that upon release from the jail sentence that she find a full time job. After sentence was imposed appellant gave notice of appeal and she is represented on this appeal by trial counsel.
The evidence was in sharp conflict and only a jury could unscramble the conflicting testimony and arrive at a verdict.
At the conclusion of the State's case appellant made a motion to exclude the evidence on the ground the State had failed to make out a case against the defendant on reliable, relevant, admissible evidence. The motion to exclude the State's evidence was overruled and denied by the trial court.
This is a search warrant case and appellant made a motion to suppress the evidence obtained pursuant to the search on the ground that the search warrant was not properly executed, was not properly served, and was not properly carried out, and that the fruits thereof would not be admissible. The Court overruled the motion to suppress after a lengthy hearing out of the presence of the jury.
The affidavit leading to the issuance of the search warrant reads as follows:
------------------------ -----------------------
C. M. Armstrong, Police J. A. Dorrill, Police
Officer Officer
Narcotics and Dangerous Narcotics and Dangerous
Drugs Detail Drugs Detail
Montgomery Police Montgomery Police
Department Department
/s/ Newman C. Sankey
--------------------
Montgomery County, Alabama" This identical affidavit was approved by this court in a unanimous opinion written by Judge Bowen in Francis E. Travis v. State, 381 So.2d 97, which was released on December 4, 1979. In this opinion Judge Bowen held:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Thomas v. State, 8 Div. 538
...is being tried is admissible if it is inconsistent with the guilt of the accused.' (Emphasis supplied). (283 So.2d [at] 670)" Allen v. State, 382 So.2d 1147, 1156 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 382 So.2d 1158 (Ala.1980). Here, the excluded evidence would not have exonerated this appellant. ......
-
Boggan v. State
...State, 369 So.2d 844 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 369 So.2d 854 (Ala.1979); Lofton v. State, 371 So.2d 988 (Ala.Crim.App.1979); Allen v. State, 382 So.2d 1147 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 382 So.2d 1158 The appellant contends that the trial court committed reversible error in allowing t......
-
Hall v. State
...the guilt of another, provided that the evidence relates to the res gestae of the offense and exonerates the accused. Allen v. State, 382 So.2d 1147, 1156 (Ala. Cr.App.), cert. denied, Ex parte Allen, 382 So.2d 1158 (Ala.1980). See also Underwood v. State, 239 Ala. 29, 193 So. 155 (1940); R......
-
Travis v. State
...is being tried is admissible if it is inconsistent with the guilt of the accused.' (Emphasis supplied). (283 So.2d at 670)" "Allen v. State, 382 So.2d 1147, 1156 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 382 So.2d 1158 (Ala.1980). "Here, the excluded evidence would not have exonerated this appellant. ......