Allen v. State, 6 Div. 34

Decision Date04 September 1979
Docket Number6 Div. 34
PartiesRobert Eugene ALLEN v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Jerry W. Jackson, of Jackson & Sullivan, Haleyville, for appellant.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Willis E. Isaac, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, appellee.

BOOKOUT, Judge.

First degree murder; sentence: life imprisonment.

On the morning of October 19, 1978, L. C. Barnett was deer hunting in the Bankhead Forest when he discovered the body of Joe E. Fowler, Jr. The victim had been killed by a shotgun blast. The body was located off Cranal Road in Winston County.

The evidence for the State revealed that several days prior to the death of Mr. Fowler, he and the appellant had participated in the theft of some automobiles. Fowler was apprehended during the theft of one of the automobiles. He signed a confession admitting his involvement and implicated the appellant in the thefts.

James Thorton testified that the appellant and the victim were at his home the night before the body was found. The appellant told Thorton that the victim was either going to have to leave town or that he would have to kill him. That same night the appellant told John Rayburn Lawson that he was going to get the victim a bus ticket out of town because of some problems about stolen automobiles.

On the morning the body was discovered, the appellant again came by Thorton's home and told Thorton and Lawson that he did not have to worry about the victim any longer because he had killed him. The appellant stated that he had killed the victim with a shotgun because the victim had turned State's evidence against him. The evidence was therefore sufficient to go to the jury.

The only issue to be raised on appeal concerns whether venue was proven. The appellant specifically raised that question in his motion to exclude the evidence at the conclusion of the State's evidence. He contends that the State only proved where the body was found and not where the death took place.

Under Alabama law venue is in the county where the offense was committed, and it may be established by circumstantial evidence. Section 15-2-2, Code of Ala.1975; Willcutt v. State, 284 Ala. 547, 226 So.2d 328 (1969).

The body was found in Winston County approximately fifteen to twenty feet off a one lane gravel roadway. There were splatter marks of blood between the body and the roadway.

John H. Kilburn, a State Toxicologist, testified that the death was caused by a shotgun wound to the victim's back. He stated that the victim would have died in less than five minutes and would have lost a large amount of blood.

Jerry Thomas, an investigator for the Alabama Department of Public Safety, testified that he was present at the crime scene when the body was moved. He stated that when the body was turned over...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Rothchild v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 27, 1989
    ...suffice. Creech v. State, 508 So.2d 302, 303 (Ala.Cr.App.1987). See also Lewis v. State, 461 So.2d 9, 11 (Ala.1984); Allen v. State, 374 So.2d 447 (Ala.Cr.App.1979). Therefore, if the State offered enough evidence to prove that the crime at issue was committed in Mobile County, it also met ......
  • Harris v. State, 8 Div. 376
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 7, 1980
    ...evidence, the jury could properly conclude from the circumstantial evidence that she was killed in Lawrence County. Allen v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 374 So.2d 447 (1979); Grace v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 369 So.2d 318 (1979); Cumbo v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 368 So.2d 871, cert. denied, Ala., 368 So.2d......
  • Creech v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 26, 1987
    ...So.2d 1196, 1204 (Ala.Cr.App.1984). Furthermore, it is clear that venue can be established by circumstantial evidence. Allen v. State, 374 So.2d 447 (Ala.Cr.App.1979). " 'In a criminal case, proof of venue is sufficient if it can be reasonably inferred by the jury from the facts and circums......
  • Holm v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 29, 1982
    ...testified that death from the gunshot would have been almost instantaneous. Dr. Embry corroborated that testimony. In Allen v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 374 So.2d 447, which was factually very similar to the present case, this court "Under Alabama law venue is in the county where the offense was ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT