Allied World Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v. Richard Goettle, Inc.
Decision Date | 28 May 2019 |
Docket Number | Case No. 1:17-cv-670 |
Parties | Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. Richard Goettle, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio |
This matter is before the Court on cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. In this insurance case, Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company ("Allied World") seeks a declaration that it does not owe its insured, Richard Goettle, Inc. ("Goettle"), a duty of defense or indemnification arising from a construction lawsuit pending in Louisiana. Goettle has filed a Counterclaim against Allied World for defense and indemnification. For the reasons that follow, the Court will DENY IN PART Allied World's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 62) and GRANT IN PART Goettle's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 61).
Allied World, a subsidiary of Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, GmbH, is an Arkansas corporation with its principal place of business in New York. Allied World provides professional liability coverage to engineering and contracting firms for their liability risks.
Goettle is an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business in Ohio. It is an engineering and construction firm that provides commercial engineering, earth retention, pile foundation systems, and other related services.
Goettle utilized USI Insurance Services ("USI Insurance") as its insurance broker. (Ginter Dep., Doc. 41 at PageID 510.) USI Insurance contacted Cincinnati Intermediaries, a wholesale insurance brokerage firm, to assist with applying for Goettle's professional liability insurance through Allied World.
In April 2016, Goettle applied for an architects and engineers professional liability policy from Allied World using an application sent to Allied World by Richard Bolan of Cincinnati Intermediaries. On June 15, 2016, Denise Rose, an underwriter with Allied World, emailed Mr. Bolan of Cincinnati Intermediaries a quote for the insurance, a copy of the draft policy, and various draft endorsements to the policy. Among those endorsements sent by Allied World to Cincinnati Intermediaries was a draft endorsement entitled "COVERED OPERATIONS—POLLUTION COVERAGE ENDORSEMENT." On June 24, 2016, Mr. Bolan sent to Ms. Rose an email suggesting an amendment to the pollution coverage endorsement which would add a new category to "who might also be an Additional Insured." (Doc. 41-1 at PageID 571-572.) On June 27, 2016, John Savickas, a senior underwriter at Allied World, emailed Mr. Bolan an amended version of the pollution coverage endorsement. Later that day, Beth Malone of USI Insurance instructed Cincinnati Intermediaries to (Doc. 41-2 at 579.)
Allied World issued Goettle a Constructors Professional Liability and Protective Policy No. 0310-2122 for the Policy Period from June 28, 2016 to June 28, 2017 ("2016-2017 Policy"). (Doc. 41-3 at PageID 631.) Allied World is referred to as the Company and Goettle as the Insured in the Policy. The Declarations Page stated that "This Policy is comprised of the Declarations Page, the Policy Form, the Schedules, the Application and [seven] endorsements." (Doc. 41-3 at PageID 632; Doc. 41-7 at PageID 689.)2 The Declarations Page stated on its face:
(Doc. 41-3 at PageID 631; Doc. 41-7 at PageID 688.)
The 2016-2017 Policy provided claim limits of $5,000,000 for Each Claim Limit and for Policy Term Aggregate Limit. (Doc. 41-3 at PageID 631.) Goettle paid a total premium of $135,550 for the 2016-2017 Policy. (Id.)
Coverage Part A of § I. INSURING AGREEMENT of the Policy Form provided in relevant part as follows:
(Doc. 41-3 at PageID 652; Doc. 41-7 at PageID 715.)
The Defense Provisions in § I(D) required Allied World to provide a defense to Goettle in the following circumstances:
The Company will have the right and duty to defend any Claim made against the Insured seeking Damages payable under this Policy. The Company shall undertake and manage the defense of such Claim even if the allegations of the Claim are groundless, false or fraudulent. . . .
(Doc. 41-3 at PageID 653; Doc. 41-7 at PageID 716.)
The Policy Form contained the following relevant definitions in § IV. DEFINITIONS:
(Doc. 41-3 at PageID 659-662; Doc. 41-7 at PageID 722-725.)
Pursuant to the provisions above, the Policy provided coverage for wrongful acts in the rendering or failure to render professional services, including negligence in performing engineering services. However, the Policy Form contained § III. EXCLUSIONS, including a coverage exclusion for faulty construction services:
(Doc. 41-3 at 655-657; Doc. 41-7 at PageID 718-720.)
The Policy Form at § VIII. CONDITIONS required Goettle to provide notice to Allied World of a Claim made against it as a condition precedent to coverage:
(Doc. 41-3 at PageID 663-664; Doc. 41-7 at PageID 726-727.) Section VIII. also provided Goettle with an option to provide notice of a Potential Claim under Coverage Part A:
To continue reading
Request your trial