Allison v. Thomas

Decision Date31 January 1872
CitationAllison v. Thomas, 44 Ga. 649 (Ga. 1872)
PartiesJAMES A. ALLISON, administrator, plaintiff in error. v. HENRY R. THOMAS, executor, et al., defendant in error.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Relief Acts 1870. Constitutional Law. Before Judge Harrell. Randolph Superior Court. May Term, 1871.

Allison, as administrator of Key, sued Thomas, as executor of J. W. Thomas, and Douglass, as security, upon their promissory note made in 1860. No defense was filed. But plaintiff had filed no affidavit of having paid the taxes on the debt, as required by the Relief Act of 1870. To excuse himself, he proposed to prove that Key's estate owed nothing, and that two of his heirs-at-law were his widow and a minor, and contended that if the Acts were constitutional, which he denied, his case was excepted by its 14th section. The Court dis-missed the cause for want of said affidavit. That is assigned as error on said grounds.

Hood & Kiddoo, for plaintiff in error.

E. L. Douglass; C. B. Wooten, for defendant.

*MONTGOMERY, Judge.

The Court below dismissed this case for want of the tax affidavit required by the Relief Act of 1870, the suit being upon a note made before June, 1865. The plaintiff offered to show that the estate owed no debts, and that two of the heirs were a widow and minor, there being also adult heirs. The Court refused to let the proof be made. Plaintiff also objected to the dismissal on the ground that the Act of 1870 was contrary both to the Constitution of the United States and to that of Georgia.

The Court held the Act to be constitutional, and plaintiff excepted. Upon the hearing before this Court, counsel submitted the constitutional point without argument. And hence the decision in this case, as to that point, is placed upon the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Cooper v. Rollins
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • February 14, 1922
    ... ...          1 ... Every presumption will be made in favor of the ... constitutionality of an act of the Legislature. Allison ... v. Thomas, 44 Ga. 649. Before an act of the Legislature ... will be declared unconstitutional, the conflict between the ... act and the ... ...
  • Coy v. Linder
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • November 25, 1936
    ... ...          "Every ... presumption will be made in favor of the constitutionality of ... an act of the Legislature. Allison v. Thomas, 44 Ga ... 649. Before an act of the Legislature will be declared ... unconstitutional, the conflict between the act and the ... ...
  • Davis v. Board of Ed. of Coffee County
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • November 13, 1947
    ... ... Wellborn v. Estes, 70 Ga. 390 ... Every presumption will be made in favor of the ... constitutionality of an act of the legislature. Allison ... v. Thomas, 44 Ga. 649. Since the legislature, as well as ... the court, is bound by the Constitution, and the members of ... that body, like ... ...
  • Richter v. Burdock
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • February 20, 1913
    ...thereafter refuse to consider their constitutionality. Home Telephone Co. v. People's Telephone Co., 125 Tenn. 270, 141 S. W. 845;Allison v. Thomas, 44 Ga. 649;Bull v. Kelley, 83 Kan. 597, 112 Pac. 133. In Marshall v. Silliman, 61 Ill. 218, was involved the validity of acts authorizing muni......
  • Get Started for Free