Allright, Inc. v. Pearson

Decision Date13 May 1987
Docket NumberNo. C-5470,C-5470
CitationAllright, Inc. v. Pearson, 735 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. 1987)
PartiesALLRIGHT, INC., Petitioner, v. Carolyn PEARSON, Respondent.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

George Bishop, Houston, for petitioner.

Randy Schaffer, Houston, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Carolyn Pearson sued Allright, Inc., the operator of the Rice Rittenhouse parking garage for negligence. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of Pearson based on the jury's verdict. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment and upon Pearson's motion, reformed the judgment to include prejudgment interest relying on Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, 696 S.W.2d 549 (Tex.1985). 711 S.W.2d 686 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1986). We grant Allright's application for writ of error and without hearing oral arguments, reverse the court of appeals' award of prejudgment interest. Tex.R.App.P. 133(b). We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals in all other respects.

The prejudgment interest rule in Cavnar is applicable to all future cases as well as those still in the judicial process. However, this court did not modify the procedural rules nor did we dispense with the requirement of preserving errors. Pearson did not complain to the trial court of its failure to award prejudgment interest nor did she assign a point of error or crosspoint in the court of appeals on this issue. Pearson waived any claim for prejudgment interest by failing to preserve her point of error on appeal. See Washington v. Walker County, 708 S.W.2d 493, 497 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, writ ref'd n.r.e.).

A point of error not preserved, is not before the appellate court for review. Tex.R.App.P. 52(c). It is error for a court of appeals to consider unassigned points of error. American General Fire & Casualty Co. v. Weinberg, 639 S.W.2d 688 (Tex.1982). See also Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Brown, 613 S.W.2d...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
116 cases
  • Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • August 9, 1996
    ...the issue of its foreseeability nor dispositive of a duty to reasonably anticipate its occurrence"), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 735 S.W.2d 240 (Tex.1987); Onciano v. Golden Palace Restaurant, Inc., 219 Cal.App.3d 385, 268 Cal.Rptr. 96 (1990) (prior similar incidents is an important facto......
  • Yancey v. Floyd West & Co., 2-87-263-CV
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • July 28, 1988
    ...and should be strictly construed against the insurer by failing to raise the alleged ambiguity in the trial court. See Allright, Inc. v. Pearson, 735 S.W.2d 240 (Tex.1987); Dorchester Development v. Safeco Ins., 737 S.W.2d 380, 383 (Tex.App.--Dallas 1987, no writ); TEX.R.APP.P. 52(a). Furth......
  • Krier v. Safeway Stores 46, Inc.
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • July 31, 1997
    ...(1987), aff'd, 437 N.W.2d 194 (S.D.1989); Allright, Inc. v. Pearson, 711 S.W.2d 686 (Tex.App.1986), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 735 S.W.2d 240 (Tex.1987). Upon closer review, however, it becomes apparent that courts continue to struggle with an appropriate legal standard to determine the ......
  • Jefferson Cnty. v. Nguyen
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • July 31, 2015
    ...failure to object to the trial court concerning an award of prejudgment interest waives the issue on appeal. See Allright, Inc. v. Pearson, 735 S.W.2d 240, 240 (Tex. 1987); Henry v. Thompson, No. 01-01-01211-CV, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 2246, **14-15 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 13, 2003......
  • Get Started for Free