Allstate Indemnity Co. v. Stump, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

Decision Date15 November 1999
Docket NumberDEFENDANT-APPELLEE,No. 97-35822,PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,97-35822
Parties(9th Cir. 1999) ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION,, v. VINA STUMP, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF HAROLD STUMP; VERNON THE BOY AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF VICTOR THE BOY; AND ARTHUR WINDY BOY, ASSOCIATE JUDGE, CHIPPEWA CREE TRIBAL COURT, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY ONLY,
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Appeal from the United states District Court for the District of Montana; Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-97-00082-DWM

Prior report: 191 F.3d 1071

ORDER

The opinion filed August 19, 1999, amended September 13, 1999, is further amended as follows:

At slip opinion page 9461, lines 9-14, delete "the Supreme Court there affirmed . . . only if the Strate futility exception applies." Substitute "the Supreme Court there held that exhaustion was not required where it is evident that the tribal court lacks jurisdiction, not that the exhaustion requirement has been abolished altogether."

Page 9461, line 18, delete "Exhaustion, however, cannot be waived."

Page 9463, lines 9-13: delete "Generally speaking. . . been unnecessary."

To continue reading

Request your trial
62 cases
  • Nguyen v. McGrath
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • 28 Mayo 2004
  • Marceau v. Blackfeet Housing Authority
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 22 Agosto 2008
    ...tribal remedies prior to proceeding in federal court." Allstate Indem. Co. v. Stump, 191 F.3d 1071, 1073 (9th Cir.), amended, 197 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir.1999). Although Plaintiffs' contract claim has not yet been brought in tribal court, "[t]he absence of any ongoing litigation over the same ma......
  • Roberts v. Broomfield
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • 28 Octubre 2022
    ...error alleged must have resulted in a complete miscarriage of justice.” Hill v. United States, 368 U.S. 424, 428 (1962); see also Henry, 197 F.3d at 1031; Crisafi v. Oliver, 396 F.2d 293, 294-95 (9th Cir. 1968); Chavez v. Dickson, 280 F.2d 727, 736 (9th Cir. 1960). Habeas corpus cannot be u......
  • Alvarez v. Tracy
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 8 Diciembre 2014
    ...the tribal exhaustion requirement are exceptional. In Allstate Indemnity Corporation v. Stump, 191 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir.), amended 197 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir.1999), we recognized that, because tribal sovereignty is of critical importance, the tribal exhaustion requirement is appropriately address......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT