Allstate Ins. Co. v. Motor State Ins. Co.
| Decision Date | 18 May 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 1,Docket No. 8937,1 |
| Citation | 190 N.W.2d 352,33 Mich.App. 469 |
| Parties | ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MOTOR STATE INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellant, and Harley Copeland, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Bertha M. Copeland, Deceased, Defendant-Appellant |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US |
Robert C. Marshall, Rouse, Selby, Dickinson, Shaw & Pike, Detroit, for Motor State.
James E. Logan, Leven & Logan, Detroit, for Copeland.
Garan, Lucow & Miller, Detroit, for plaintiff-appellee.
Before LESINSKI, C.J., and V. J. BRENNAN and DANHOF, JJ.
On December 12, 1966, Motor State Insurance Company issued an automobile liability insurance policy, covering a 1964 Ford automobile, to Judith or Norman L. Bangs. The automobile was owned by Norman L. Bangs and both he and Judith Bangs were listed as named insureds in the policy. In the policy Norman L. Bangs, whose driver's license had been previously suspended, was listed as an excluded driver. The policy contained the following clause:
'Such insurance as is afforded by the policy shall be null and void at such times as an owned or non-owned automobile is being operated by an individual named in the Declaration Certificate as an Excluded Driver.'
On December 12, 1966, Motor State also issued a certificate of insurance to Judith or Norman L. Bangs which stated:
'This form certifies that a policy has been issued to you covering the described motor vehicle in compliance with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act.'
On December 17, 1966, Norman L. Bangs, while operating the 1964 Ford automobile was involved in an accident with a car driven by Bertha M. Copeland who sustained fatal injuries.
The administrator of Bertha M. Copeland's estate sought to recover from Allstate Insurance Company under the uninsured motorist provision contained in a policy of insurance that Allstate had issued to Bertha M. Copeland. Allstate commenced this action seeking a declaratory judgment that Norman L. Bangs was not an uninsured motorist. The trial court found for the plaintiff stating that the exclusionary provisions contained in the policy of insurance issued by Motor State are 'invalid, being contrary to public policy in the statutory law of this State.' Defendants have appealed.
If the exclusionary clause in the policy issued to Judith or Norman L. Bangs is valid, then it is clear that the 1964 Ford automobile, at the time it struck the defendant's deceased, was an uninsured motor vehicle. Thus, the question presented is the validity of the exclusionary clause.
Before the enactment of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act, M.C.L.A. § 257.1101 et seq. (Stat.Ann.1968 Rev. § 9.2801 et seq.), the exclusionary clause would have been valid. Burch v. Wargo (1966), 378 Mich. 200, 144 N.W.2d 342. We must now determine if the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act changes this result.
Section 4 of the Act, M.C.L.A. § 257.1104 (Stat.Ann.1968 Rev. § 9.2804), provides in part:
'The owner or operator of a motor vehicle who operates or permits its operation upon the highways of this state shall produce, in accordance with the provisions of subsection (3) of this section, upon the request of any peace officer, evidence that the vehicle is an insured motor vehicle, or that the uninsured motor vehicle fee has been paid.'
Section 2 of the Act, M.C.L.A. § 257.1102 (Stat.Ann.1968 Rev. § 9.2802), provides in part:
'(d) 'Uninsured motor vehicle' means a motor vehicle as to which there is not in force a liability policy meeting the requirements of the motor vehicle responsibility law of this state, established pursuant to the provisions of chapter 5 of Act No. 300 of the Public Acts of 1949, as amended, being sections 257.501 to 257.532 of the Compiled Laws of 1948, and which is not owned by a holder of self-insurance under the law.'
M.C.L.A. § 257.520(b)(2) (Stat.Ann.1968 Rev. § 9.2220(b)(2)) provides that a policy of insurance,
'Shall insure The person named therein and any other person, as insured, using any such motor...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bowser v. Jacobs
...Rev. § 9.2220). See, generally, Bennett v. Pitts (1971), 31 Mich.App. 530, 188 N.W.2d 81; Allstate Insurance Company v. Motor State Insurance Company (1971), 33 Mich.App. 469, 190 N.W.2d 352.23 P.A.1971, Nos. 19, 63, M.C.L.A. §§ 257.1103, 257.1103a (Stat.Ann.Curr.Mat. §§ 9.2803, 9.2803(1)).......
-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Wyoming Ins. Dept.
...322, 324-325 (1975), the Court of Appeals of Michigan, citing with approval its prior opinion in Allstate Insurance Company v. Motor State Insurance Co., 33 Mich.App. 469, 190 N.W.2d 352 (1971), "Allstate, supra, involved the validity of an exclusionary clause in an automobile liability pol......
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Shelly
...February 1, 1974. The trial court found that the exclusionary clause was invalid in light of Allstate Insurance Co. v. Motor State Insurance Co., 33 Mich.App. 469, 190 N.W.2d 352 (1971), lv. den., 386 Mich. 760 (1971). Thus, the exclusionary clause was stricken from the insurance policy, an......
-
State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Babcock
...Viz., either a policy of liability insurance or payment of the uninsured motorists vehicle fee, Allstate Ins. Co. v. Motor State Ins. Co., 33 Mich.App. 469, 473, 190 N.W.2d 352, 354 (1971); Celina Mutual Ins. Co. v. Preferred Risk Mutual Ins. Co., 51 Mich.App. 99, 102, 214 N.W.2d 704, 705 (......