Allstate Ins. Co. v. Carr, 79-067

Decision Date12 December 1979
Docket NumberNo. 79-067,79-067
Citation409 A.2d 782,119 N.H. 851
PartiesALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Joseph I. CARR, Jr., Janet Carr and Susan Wargo, Administratrix of Estate of James Wargo, Jr.
CourtNew Hampshire Supreme Court

Devine, Millimet, Stahl & Branch, P. A., Manchester (Alan B. Rindler, Manchester, orally), for plaintiff.

Boyer Legal Professional Ass'n, Nashua (Richard E. Boyer, Nashua, orally), for defendants Joseph and Janet Carr.

Prunier, Mazerolle & Frasca, Nashua (Stephen J. Frasca, Nashua, orally), for defendant Susan Wargo.

PER CURIAM.

This case involves issues arising out of a declaratory judgment action filed by Allstate Insurance Company pursuant to RSA 491:22 to determine its obligations to its insured, Joseph I. Carr, Jr.

The following facts are not disputed based upon the depositions of Joseph and Janet Carr. In May 1976, Susan Wargo was living in the home of Joseph and Janet Carr. On May 14, 1976, the Carrs returned home from a banquet to find Susan being attacked by her estranged husband, James Wargo. James claimed that Susan was seeing another man and he demanded the man's name. As the Carrs attempted to intercede, James struck Mrs. Carr. When he subsequently calmed down, the Carrs left the Wargos together and retired. Later that night, in response to Susan's scream, Joseph Carr went back downstairs and broke up another altercation.

Two days later James Wargo telephoned Joseph Carr and stated that he was coming to the Carrs' home to learn his rival's name so he could kill him. He also threatened Mr. Carr. Carr called the police who refused to come to the Carr home. Before Mr. Wargo arrived, Mr. Carr placed a loaded revolver on the dining-room table. When James arrived he entered the house by force and advanced toward Mr. Carr, who retreated to the dining area and picked up the gun.

Mr. Carr testified in his deposition that he warned James he would use the gun but that James did not heed the warning; that James finally lunged at him, and in attempting to escape, Mr. Carr stumbled against a wall and accidentally fired the weapon. He denied any intention of shooting or killing Mr. Wargo. The bullet hit Mr. Wargo in the neck and he died on June 18, 1976.

The defendants in this declaratory action are Joseph I. Carr, Jr., Janet Carr, and Susan Wargo, administratrix of the estate of James Wargo, Jr. Two civil actions are pending against Joseph Carr in the superior court; one brought by James Wargo, Jr., before his death, alleging bodily injury, and the other brought by Susan Wargo, alleging wrongful death. Both declarations allege that Joseph Carr's act of shooting James Wargo was reckless, careless and negligent.

The issue at the declaratory action hearing was whether the shooting of James Wargo on May 16, 1976, was expected or intended from the standpoint of the insured and thus within an exclusionary clause in Allstate's policy. The homeowner's policy issued by Allstate to Joseph and Janet Carr provided coverage for "all sums the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury . . . caused by an occurrence." The policy stated further that Allstate would defend any suit against the insured seeking damages on account of bodily injury, "even if any of the allegations of the suit are groundless, false or fraudulent." The policy excluded any coverage for injuries caused by an action of the insured which were "expected or intended from the standpoint of the insured."

In its petition for declaratory judgment, Allstate claimed that the injuries caused by Mr. Carr's actions on May 16, 1976, fell within the exclusionary clause because they were "expected or intended from the standpoint of the insured," and that Allstate had neither the duty to defend Mr. Carr in the pending civil actions nor the duty to indemnify any judgments against him in those actions.

The Superior Court (Loughlin, J.), sitting without a jury and having only the Carrs' depositions before it, found that the shooting was intentional from the standpoint of the insured, and that Allstate had no duty to defend or to indemnify Joseph Carr. Defendants Carr and Wargo both excepted to the trial court's denials of their motions to set aside the decree. These exceptions were reserved and transferred to this court.

Although Mr. Carr said that the shooting was unintentional, the trial judge...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Sundell v. Town of New London
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • 12 December 1979
  • Mottolo v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Hampshire
    • 16 August 1993
    ...719, 722-23, 609 A.2d 1231 (1992); Moore v. New Hampshire Ins. Co., 122 N.H. 328, 331-33, 444 A.2d 543 (1982); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Carr, 119 N.H. 851, 853, 409 A.2d 782 (1979)). In such circumstances, the court looks to the facts underlying the complaint "to avoid permitting the pleading s......
  • Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Taylor
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 26 December 1986
    ...(E.D.Mo.1977), 425 F.Supp. 827; Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Mauldin (1983), 62 N.C.App. 461, 303 S.E.2d 214; Allstate Ins. Co. v. Carr (1979), 119 N.H. 851, 409 A.2d 782; Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Obenshain (1978), 219 Va. 44, 245 S.E.2d 247; U.S.F. & G. Ins. Co. v. Brannan (1979), 22 Was......
  • Vergote v. K Mart Corp.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 6 May 1987
    ...Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 20 Wash.App. 503, 581 P.2d 167 (1978); Bush v. Putty, 566 S.W.2d 819 (Ky.App., 1978); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Carr, 119 N.H. 851, 409 A.2d 782 (1979); Robinson v. Nevada Immigration[158 MICHAPP 106] District, 101 Cal.App.3d 760, 161 Cal.Rptr. 863 (1980); 5 Am Jur 2d......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT