Allyn v. Boe
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Citation | Allyn v. Boe, 958 P.2d 315, 134 Wn.2d 1020 (Wash. 1998) |
| Decision Date | 05 May 1998 |
| Parties | Richard J. Allyn, Winifred Allyn v. Gordon Boe, Beverlee Boe, Myron Struck, Karin Struck, Chris Struck, Jane Doe Struck, Gordon Boe Construciton NO. 66211-8 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
7 cases
-
In re Detention of Broten
... ... But litigants are entitled to a fair trial, not a perfect one. McDonough Power Equip., Inc. v. Greenwood, 464 U.S. 548, 553, 104 S.Ct. 845, 78 L.Ed.2d 663 (1984). A juror's failure to speak during voir dire regarding a material fact can amount to juror misconduct. Allyn v. Boe, 87 Wash.App. 722, 729, 943 P.2d 364 (1997), review denied, 134 Wash.2d 1020, 958 P.2d 315 (1998). The United States Supreme Court has held that to obtain a new trial in such a situation, a party must prove (1) that "a juror failed to answer honestly a material question on voir dire" and (2) ... ...
-
Hill v. Cox
... ... Sherrell v. Selfors, 73 Wash.App. 596, 602, 871 P.2d 168, review denied, 125 Wash.2d 1002, 886 P.2d 1134 (1994). For example, lost profits may be recovered for injury to Christmas trees intended to be sold at a market price. Allyn v. Boe, 87 Wash.App. 722, 732, 943 P.2d 364 (1997), review denied, 134 Wash.2d 1020, 958 P.2d 315 (1998). The measure of damage for loss of residential or ornamental trees is restoration or replacement cost. Id.; Birchler, 133 Wash.2d at 111-12, 942 P.2d 968 ... Trees functioning as a buffer ... ...
-
ASHWORTH v. SNYDER
...or argued in the trial court will not be considered on appeal. Allyn v. Boe, 87 Wn. App. 722, 731, 943 P.2d 1141 (1997), review denied, 134 Wn.2d 1020 (1998); see RAP 2.5(a). Although Ms. Snyder and Mr. Challinor did not raise the issue in their written motions for reconsideration, their tr......
-
Mojarrad v. Walden
... ... Sabey , 101 Wn. App. at 592-93. Under the discovery rule, the statute of limitations does not begin to run until a plaintiff discovers or reasonably could have discovered all the essential elements of the cause of action. See Allyn v. Boe , 87 Wn. App. 722, 943 P.2d 364 (1997). review denied , 134 Wn.2d 1020 (1998). Negligent misrepresentation The essential elements of the tort of negligent misrepresentation in Washington are (1) the defendant supplied information for the guidance of others in their ... ...
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...149 Wn.2d 1028 (2003): 2A.7(4), 2A.7(7), 9.6(7)(d), 54.6(4)(b), 58.6(7) Allyn v. Boe, 87 Wn.App. 722, 943 P.2d 364 (1997), review denied, 134 Wn.2d 1020 (1998): 47.7(1), 59.5(2)(i), 59.6(3)(b), 59.7(2), 59.7(3) Alpine Indus., Inc. v. Gohl, 30 Wn.App. 750, 637 P.2d 998 (1981), review denied,......
-
§ 8.4 - Timberland and Neighbors
...as discussed more fully below, the measure of damages may vary. See Allyn v. Boe, 87 Wn.App. 722, 943 P.2d 364 (1997), review denied, 134 Wn.2d 1020 (1998); see also Henriksen v. Lyons, 33 Wn.App. 123, 652 P.2d 18 (1982), review denied, 99 Wn.2d 1001 Although discussed in greater detail bel......
-
Table of Cases
...18.4(8) Allper, In re, 94 Wn.2d 456, 617 P.2d 982 (1980): 17.2(2)(b) Allyn v. Boe, 87 Wn. App. 722, 943 P.2d 364 (1997), review denied, 134 Wn.2d 1020 (1998): 8.4(1) Am. Nursery Prods., Inc. v. Indian Wells Orchards, 115 Wn.2d 217, 797 P.2d 477 (1990): 18.4(8) Am. Smelting & Refining Co. v.......
-
§59.6 Analysis
...of discretion is present and the rulings are subject to de novo review. Allyn v. Boe, 87 Wn.App. 722, 729, 943P.2d364, review denied, 134 Wn.2d 1020 (1997); McCoy, 163 Wn.App. at 758. RCW 4.76.030 expressly provides de novo review of rulings granting additur and remittitur and requires that......
Get Started for Free
