Almanza-Arenas v. Lynch, s. 09–71415
| Decision Date | 08 May 2015 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 09–71415,10–73715.,s. 09–71415 |
| Citation | 785 F.3d 366 (Mem) |
| Parties | Gabriel ALMANZA–ARENAS, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. Gabriel Almanza–Arenas, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Michael Joseph Codner, Murray David Hilts, Law Offices of Michael J. Codner, San Diego, CA, Mark Christopher Fleming, Esquire, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, Jayashri Srikantiah, Mills Legal Clinic, Stanford, CA, Daniel L. Winik, Wilmerhale LLP, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.
Carol Federighi, Patrick James Glen, Esquire, Stefanie N. Hennes, Bryan Stuart Beier, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Office of the Chief Counsel Department
of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Almanza-Arenas v. Lynch
...panel granted the petition. Almanza–Arenas v. Holder, 771 F.3d 1184 (9th Cir.2014). We then granted rehearing en banc. Almanza–Arenas v. Lynch, 785 F.3d 366 (9th Cir.2015).II. ANALYSIS To determine whether section 10851(a) is a crime involving moral turpitude, we apply the three-step proces......
-
Almanza-Arenas v. Lynch
...panel granted the petition. Almanza–Arenas v. Holder, 771 F.3d 1184 (9th Cir.2014). We then granted rehearing en banc. Almanza–Arenas v. Lynch, 785 F.3d 366 (9th Cir.2015).II. ANALYSIS To determine whether section 10851(a) is a crime involving moral turpitude, we apply the three-step proces......
-
Le v. Lynch
...the burden to the Government. See Almanza–Arenas v. Holder, 771 F.3d 1184, 1190, 1193 (9th Cir.2014), en banc reh'g granted, 785 F.3d 366 (9th Cir.2015). The Almanza–Arenas court applied the categorical approach to determine whether the alien's prior conviction for taking or driving another......
-
Godoy-Ramirez v. Lynch
...(en banc); abrogated in part on other grounds by Almanza-Arenas v. Holder, 771 F.3d 1184 (9th Cir. 2014), reh'g en banc granted, 785 F.3d 366 (9th Cir. 2015). Thus, we find that she exhausted this claim. Reviewing her claim on the merits, we agree that the IJ violated her Due Process rights......