Almon v. State
| Decision Date | 01 June 1926 |
| Docket Number | 5 Div. 605 |
| Citation | 109 So. 371,21 Ala.App. 466 |
| Parties | ALMON v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Rehearing Granted June 29, 1926
Appeal from Circuit Court, Randolph County; N.D. Denson, Judge.
William Almon was convicted of rape, and he appeals. Reversed, and remanded on rehearing.
Hooton & Hooton, of Roanoke, for appellant.
Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Chas. H. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen for the State.
Omitting the formal part, the indictment against this appellant charged that "William Almon forcibly ravished Irma Moore, a girl." The defendant demurred to the indictment upon the grounds: "Said indictment fails to allege that person ravished was a woman."
It is here insisted that the demurrer should have been sustained as the indictment does not conform substantially with the form 88, Criminal Code, § 4556, and a girl without any age proven or alleged is not a woman.
We construe this insistence to mean that the indictment is defective in the use of the word "girl," instead of the word "woman." This insistence is wholly without merit. This identical question has been decided in the cases of Dixon v. State, 147 Ala. 91, 41 So. 734, 119 Am.St.Rep. 57, 10 Ann.Cas. 957; Butler v. State, 120 Ala. 668, 25 So. 1024; King v. State, 120 Ala. 332 25 So. 178.
It appears from the record that after arraignment, and defendant's plea, but before entering upon the trial, it was made known to the court that the alleged injured party Irma Moore, was afflicted with a physical infirmity necessitating an interpreter to properly interpret and translate her testimony; the infirmity being that she was tongue-tied and as a result thereof her speech and utterances were so impaired and obstructed she could not be understood by any one not familiar with her. Over the objection and exception of defendant the court administered an oath to Mrs. Berta Moore, the mother of Irma Moore, to truly and correctly interpret and state to the jury and court what Miss Irma Moore testifies. The objections of appellant were based "(1) to Mrs. Moore, as mother of witness, relating by her mouth this testimony; (2) on the grounds that it is not shown that the witness speaks any foreign language." After further investigation by the court, defendant's objections were overruled, and, as stated, defendant excepted.
There was no controversy relative to the alleged physical infirmity of Irma Moore; and it was made to appear, without conflict, that, because of such affliction, she could not be understood by any one not familiar with her manner of speech. She was, of course, the principal witness for the state, and, because of the nature of the accusation, the state's case, of necessity, rested upon her testimony. Therefore the court properly provided the only means by which this cause could be heard and determined.
In the case of Terry v. State, 105 So. 387, this court dealt with the question of the power of the court to provide an interpreter where one is needed, and decided that it was the imperative duty of the court so to do. Of course, the law contemplates that a fair, impartial, and correct interpretation shall be had, and to this end, a disinterested interpreter should be provided if possible to be secured. Here, the mother of the witness, who was also the alleged injured party, was used as an interpreter. The objection to the mother being used as such was made. But no further objection was interposed as to her manner of interpretation, and no ruling of the court was invoked in this connection; in other words, there was no insistence that the mother did not properly, truly, and correctly translate and give to the court and jury the testimony as given by her daughter on the trial of this case. We must therefore assume that no prejudice resulted to defendant in this connection and we hold that the insistence here made cannot be sustained.
The principal point of decision here presented is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the charge of rape. The manifest importance of this case to appellant (who was given a sentence of 15 years' imprisonment in the penitentiary) and to the state impelled this court, as a whole, to read this record in its entirety and to consider, en banc, this question. Having carefully done so, we are forced to the conclusion that a jury question was presented and we must sustain the fair and learned trial judge who so held.
There was evidence tending to show the flight of this defendant shortly after the alleged commission of the offense and that he was apprehended in another state. There was also evidence by defendant tending to explain his alleged flight. These were jury questions.
Upon the examination of the defendant, who testified as a witness in his own behalf, he...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Van Tran
...should attempt to appoint a neutral, unbiased interpreter, one who has no interest in the outcome of the trial. Almon v. State, 21 Ala.App. 466, 109 So. 371, 372 (1926) (Disinterested interpreter should be used when possible); Western & A.R. Co. v. Deitch, 136 Ga. 46, 70 S.E. 798 (1911) (Wh......
-
USA v. Damra
...interpreter should be provided if possible....” Prince v. Beto, 426 F.2d 875, 877 (5th Cir.1970) (quoting Almon v. State, 21 Ala.App. 466, 109 So. 371, 372 (1926)). Rasoletti, the lead criminal investigator, actually sat at the prosecution table and was introduced to the jury as the man who......
-
Hooks v. State, 3 Div. 282
...State, 444 So.2d 902, 904 (Ala.Crim.App.1984) (interpreter was the teacher and friend of the victim-witness). See also Almon v. State, 21 Ala.App. 466, 109 So. 371 (1926) (interpreter was the mother of the victim-witness); Hyman v. State, 338 So.2d 448 (Ala.Crim.App.1976) (interpreter was w......
-
Fairbanks v. Cowan
...551 F.2d 97 ... Jack FAIRBANKS, Petitioner-Appellant, ... Henry E. COWAN, Superintendent, Kentucky State Penitentiary, ... Respondent-Appellee ... No. 76-1154 ... United States Court of Appeals, ... Sixth Circuit ... Argued Dec. 1, 1976 ... Decided ... The decision bearing the closest factual resemblance to the present case is Almon v. State,5 where a mother was permitted to serve as interpreter for her tongue-tied daughter, the victim of an alleged rape. The Alabama Court of ... ...