Alon Ref. Krotz Springs, Inc. v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 16-1052

Decision Date30 August 2019
Docket Number17-1259,17-1049,17-1047,17-1052,17-1051,17-1255,18-1029,C/w 16-1055,18-1021,18-1025,18-1024,C/w 17-1045,No. 16-1052,No. 17-1044,16-1052,17-1044
Citation936 F.3d 628
Parties ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC., Petitioner v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent Monroe Energy, LLC, et al., Intervenors Coffeyville Resources Refining & Marketing, LLC and Wynnewood Refining Company, LLC, Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc., et al., Intervenors
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. Introduction...634

B. Procedural Background...638

1. 2007, 2010, and 2017 Point of Obligation Proceedings...638

2. 2017 Annual Volumetric Proceedings...640

III. Standard of Review...640

IV. 2010 Point of Obligation Rule...641

B. Merits of Challenges to EPA's Refusal to Revise the 2010 Point of Obligation Rule...648

V. 2017 Annual Volumetric Rule...653

C. Cellulosic Waiver...662

VI. 2018 Volume for Biomass-Based Diesel...664

B. Merits of NBB's Challenges...665

VII. Conclusion...668

I. Introduction

The Clean Air Act requires EPA to publish "renewable fuel standards," ultimately expressed as "applicable percentages," each year to ensure that the total supply of transportation fuel sold or imported into the United States contains specified proportions of each of four categories of renewable fuels. Congress intended the Renewable Fuel Standards (RFS) program to "move the United States toward greater energy independence and security" and "increase the production of clean renewable fuels." See Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), Pub. L. No. 110-140, preamble, 121 Stat. 1492 (2007) (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 7545(o ) ).

In these related cases, Alon Refining Krotz Springs, together with other petroleum refineries and their trade associations—the "Alon Petitioners"—seek review of EPA's decision not to revise its 2010 point of obligation regulation requiring refineries and importers, but not blenders, to bear the direct compliance obligation of ensuring that transportation fuels sold or introduced into the U.S. market include the requisite percentages of renewables. Coffeyville Resources Refining & Marketing and another group of refineries and trade associations—the "Coffeyville Petitioners"—challenge EPA's refusal to reassess the appropriateness of the point of obligation in the context of its 2017 annual volumetric rule, which set the 2017 applicable percentages for all four categories of renewable fuel and the 2018 applicable volume for one subset of such fuel, biomass-based diesel. See 81 Fed. Reg. 89,746 (Dec. 12, 2016) (2017 Rule). The Coffeyville Petitioners also contend that EPA arbitrarily set the 2017 percentage standards too high. The National Biodiesel Board (NBB)—a biomass-based diesel industry trade association—separately contends that EPA set the 2018 applicable volume for biomass-based diesel too low. Various trade associations representing refineries and producers of renewable fuels have intervened in support of EPA. For the reasons that follow, we deny each of the petitions for review, many of which recycle arguments raised and rejected in prior challenges.

II. Background
A. Legal Background

Congress established the RFS program in 2005 as part of the Energy Policy Act, Pub. L. No. 109-58, 119 Stat. 594 (2005) (as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 7545(o ) ). The statute mandates the gradual introduction of four nested categories of renewable fuels into the United States' supply of gasoline, diesel, and other transportation fuels. See 42 U.S.C. § 7545(o )(2)(B). These categories include: (1) total renewable fuel; (2) advanced biofuel; (3) cellulosic biofuel; and (4) biomass-based diesel. Id. § 7545(o )(2)(A)(i), (B). The umbrella category, total renewable fuel, covers the three other categories plus any conventional renewable fuels, such as corn-based ethanol. See id. § 7545(o )(1)(F), (J), (2)(A)(i). The advanced biofuel subset includes any renewable fuel (except ethanol from cornstarch) that has at least 50% lower lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions than fossil fuels. Id. § 7545(o )(1)(B). The statute further specifies two nonexclusive subsets of advanced biofuels: cellulosic biofuel (a renewable fuel derived from cellulose materials such as corn stalks and husks) and biomass-based diesel (a diesel fuel substitute made from feedstocks such as animal fats). Id. § 7545(o )(1)(B), (D), (E) ; EPA Coffeyville Br. 4–5. The following figure depicts the nested nature of the four fuel categories.

Four tables in the statute set forth gradually increasing annual "applicable volume" requirements for each category of renewable fuel. See 42 U.S.C. § 7545(o )(2)(B)(i). The statute sets applicable volumes for biomass-based diesel through 2012, id . § 7545(o )(2)(B)(i)(IV), and applicable volumes for the other three categories through 2022, id. § 7545(o )(2)(B)(i)(I)(III). Under those tables, as the total quantities of renewable fuel rise over time, the ratio of advanced biofuels relative to conventional renewable fuel gradually increases. Id. For compliance years (which match calendar years) after those specified in the tables, the statute requires EPA, in coordination with the Secretaries of Energy and Agriculture, to set the annual applicable volumes based on a review of the implementation of the program plus an analysis of six listed factors. Id. § 7545(o )(2)(B)(ii). For years not specified in the table, EPA must publish the applicable volumes fourteen months before the year in which they will apply—volumes that, shortly before the start of the compliance year, EPA translates into percentage standards. Id.

Various "waiver" provisions require or permit EPA to lower the annual applicable volumes. Two are relevant for the purposes of this case. First, under the "cellulosic waiver provision," EPA must make its own projection of the volume of cellulosic biofuel that will be produced in the following year. Id. § 7545(o )(7)(D)(i). If that projection is less than the statutory figure, the agency must use its own projection as the applicable volume of cellulosic biofuel. Id. ; see Am. Petroleum Inst. v. EPA , 706 F.3d 474, 477–80 (D.C. Cir. 2013) ( API ). The same cellulosic waiver provision authorizes (but does not require) EPA to also reduce the advanced biofuel and total renewable biofuel volume requirements "by the same or a lesser volume" as the cellulosic biofuel reduction, 42 U.S.C. § 7545(o )(7)(D)(i), and EPA has "broad discretion" regarding whether and how to do that, Monroe Energy, LLC v. EPA , 750 F.3d 909, 915 (D.C. Cir. 2014). Separately, under the "general waiver provision," EPA may reduce any of the statutory applicable volumes if it determines "that implementation ... would severely harm the economy or environment," or "that there is an inadequate domestic supply." 42 U.S.C. § 7545(o )(7)(A) ; see Ams. for Clean Energy v. EPA , 864 F.3d 691, 707–13 (D.C. Cir. 2017) ( ACE ).

After EPA determines the waiver-adjusted applicable volumes, it must translate those volumes into "renewable volume obligation[s]" for each category of renewable fuel for the upcoming compliance year. 42 U.S.C. § 7545(o )(3)(B)(i). The volume obligation for each category of renewable fuel is expressed as an "applicable percentage," also known as a "percentage standard," calculated by dividing the adjusted applicable volume for that category of fuel by the total anticipated volume of non-renewable transportation fuel that will be introduced into commerce (which EPA derives based on an estimate provided by the Energy Information Administration) in the coming compliance year. Id. § 7545(o )(3)(A), (B)(ii)(II) ; 40 C.F.R. § 80.1405(c). The statute calls on EPA to publish the percentage standards not later than November 30—a month before the start of the compliance year. 42 U.S.C. § 7545(o )(3)(B)(i).

EPA must place the renewable volume obligations on "refineries, blenders, and importers, as appropriate." 42 U.S.C. § 7545(o )(3)(B)(ii)(I) ; see also id. § 7545(o )(2)(A) (requiring EPA to promulgate implementing regulations, including "compliance provisions applicable to refineries, blenders, distributors, and importers, as appropriate," designed to ensure that transportation fuel sold or introduced into the United States "contains at least" the required annual applicable volumes). The entities that EPA designates to meet the volume obligations are known as "obligated parties." Monroe Energy , 750 F.3d at 912. Each obligated party must ensure that the volume of non-renewable fuel it sells or introduces into U.S. commerce is matched by selling or introducing a corresponding volume of each category of renewable fuel at the level EPA's percentage standard requires for that category. See ACE , 864 F.3d at 699. The percentage standards are set in the anticipation that, if each obligated party meets them and EPA's projection regarding the country's total transportation fuel supply bears out, the amount of each category of renewable fuel introduced into the economy in the upcoming compliance year will equal the applicable volumes for that year. Id. Obligated parties bear no direct responsibility for any shortfalls in the applicable volumes so long as they comply with the percentage standards.

EPA assigns a set of "renewable identification numbers" (RINs) to each batch of renewable fuel that is produced or imported for use in the United States. 40 C.F.R. § 80.1426 ; see 42 U.S.C. § 7545(o )(5) ; Monroe Energy , 750 F.3d at 913. The number of RINs assigned to each batch corresponds to the amount of ethanol-equivalent energy per...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Growth Energy v. Envtl. Prot. Agency
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 16 Julio 2021
    ...refinery exemptions even though the deadline for judicial review of that policy has passed, see, e.g. , Alon Ref. Krotz Springs, Inc. v. EPA , 936 F.3d 628, 639 (D.C. Cir. 2019), cert. denied sub nom. Valero Energy Corp. v. EPA , ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 2792, 206 L.Ed.2d 955 (2020), but t......
  • Texas v. Becerra
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Texas
    • 15 Diciembre 2021
    ...the judgment) ("broad and open-ended terms" like "appropriate" "afford agencies broad policy discretion"); Alon Refin. Krotz Springs, Inc. v. EPA , 936 F.3d 628, 655 (D.C. Cir. 2019), cert. denied sub nom. , Valero Energy Corp. v. EPA , ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 2792, 206 L.Ed.2d 955 (2020)......
  • Poet Biorefining, LLC v. Envtl. Prot. Agency
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 14 Agosto 2020
    ...is a subcategory of advanced biofuel, which in turn is a subcategory of total renewable fuel. See Alon Refining Krotz Springs v. EPA , 936 F.3d 628, 635-36 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (per curiam). Each year, based on annual quotas set for each of the four statutorily defined renewable fuels, see 42 U......
  • Am. Fuel & Petrochemical Mfrs. v. Envtl. Prot. Agency
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 6 Septiembre 2019
    ...standards for 2017 and the applicable volume for biomass-based diesel for 2018. See Alon Ref. Krotz Springs, Inc. v. EPA , No. 16-1052, 936 F.3d 628, 634–35, 2019 WL 4123519 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 30, 2019) (deciding related case Coffeyville Res. Ref. & Mktg., LLC v. EPA , No. 17-1044 (D.C. Cir. f......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT