Alonso-Llamazares v. Int'l Dermatology Research, Inc.
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | LOBREE, J. |
| Citation | Alonso-Llamazares v. Int'l Dermatology Research, Inc., 339 So.3d 385 (Fla. App. 2022) |
| Decision Date | 19 January 2022 |
| Docket Number | 3D20-0985 |
| Parties | Javier ALONSO-LLAMAZARES, M.D., Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL DERMATOLOGY RESEARCH, INC., etc., Appellee. |
Ainsworth + Clancy, PLLC, and Janna O. Mateo and Ryan M. Clancy, Miami, for appellant.
Feiler & Leach, P.L., and Martin E. Leach, Coral Gables, for appellee.
Before HENDON, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.
This appeal stems from a non-compete agreement entered into between appellant Javier Alonso-Llamazares, M.D. ("Dr. Alonso") and his former employer, appellee International Dermatology Research Inc. ("IDR"). After IDR terminated Dr. Alonso's employment, IDR sought, and was granted, a temporary injunction enforcing the parties’ non-compete agreement. We affirm the trial court's determination that the non-compete agreement was enforceable and the requirements for a temporary injunction were established, but reverse and remand for the trial court to describe in reasonable detail the act or acts restrained as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c).
IDR is a medical practice management business that utilizes dermatologists to conduct clinical research projects in the area of dermatology. On October 4, 2011, IDR and Dr. Alonso entered into an Agreement for Management Services and Clinical Research Services (the "Agreement"). Under the Agreement, IDR agreed to provide certain management services to Dr. Alonso's dermatological medical practice. Dr. Alonso, in turn, agreed to conduct clinical research projects for and on behalf of IDR. Because this case concerns interpretation of the terms of the Agreement, relevant sections are set forth at length below. Section 3 of the Agreement is entitled "Term" and provides in relevant part as follows:
Unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 11 of this Agreement, the term of engagement under this Agreement shall be for a period of two (2) year [sic] commencing on the Effective Date and ending on the first anniversary of the Effective Date (the "Term").
Section 11 of the Agreement, entitled "Termination," provides in part as follows:
(emphasis in original). Dr. Alonso also agreed to a non-compete provision in section 12 of the Agreement that required the following:
(bold emphasis added) The parties continued their relationship when the Agreement expired in 2013. On January 4, 2016, the parties executed an Amendment to Agreement (the "First Amendment"), modifying provisions of the Agreement, including that the Term of the engagement under the Agreement is through December 31, 2016. The First Amendment also stated that all other aspects of the Agreement remained in effect, including section 12. Then, on January 4, 2017, the parties executed a Second Amendment to Agreement (the "Second Amendment"). The Second Amendment provided that "the term of the engagement under this Agreement shall be through December 31, 2017 (the ‘Term’)." As with the First Amendment, apart from other modifications made by the Second Amendment, the Agreement remained in effect, including but not limited to section 12. Finally, on June 1, 2017, the parties executed the Third Amendment to Agreement (the "Third Amendment"). The Third Amendment made changes to Dr. Alonso's hours and compensation but did not modify the Term. The Third Amendment also provided that "[i]n all other respects, the Agreement, the First Amendment and the Second Amendment remain in full force and effect, including, but not limited to, Section 12-Non-Competition and Confidentiality."
Dr. Alonso continued to work for IDR after December 31, 2017. Subsequently, IDR notified Dr. Alonso by letter that "as of November 1, 2019, your services are no longer required at [IDR]."1 Dr. Alonso then began operating Driven Research LLC on January 2, 2020. Dr. Alonso does not dispute that he began Driven Research to conduct clinical trials and that as of January 2, 2020, he was competing with IDR.
Shortly thereafter, on February 12, 2020, IDR filed suit against Dr. Alonso, seeking temporary and permanent injunctions and asserting claims for breach of contract and tortious interference with contractual relations based on Dr. Alonso's active competition against IDR. IDR moved for emergency injunctive relief, arguing that Dr. Alonso breached section 12 of the Agreement by competing with IDR and soliciting IDR's customers and clients. IDR argued that it was entitled to an injunction because section 542.335(1)(j), Florida Statutes (2017),2 provides that irreparable harm is presumed when a party establishes the violation of an enforceable restrictive covenant. IDR also asserted that it did not have an adequate remedy at law. IDR argued that it had a likelihood of success on the merits because the Agreement contained an enforceable non-compete provision and further argued that the granting of a temporary injunction was not against the public interest because public policy favors the enforcement of contracts and noncompete agreements, as evidenced by section 542.335. IDR sought to enjoin Dr. Alonso from: (1) working with Driven Research; (2) directly or indirectly competing with IDR for a period of two years; (3) being involved in clinical research or trials relating to dermatological products or procedures for a period of two years within a five-mile radius; (4) attempting to solicit or soliciting or contacting IDR's patients, customers, or clients for a period of two...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Builder Servs. Grp. v. Harkins
... BUILDER SERVICES GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL HARKINS et al., Defendant. No ... Alonso-Llamazares v. Int'l Dermatology Rsch., ... Inc., 339 So.3d 385, ... concepts, designs, specifications, research and development ... efforts, technical data and ... ...
-
Employer-employee relations
...a violation of a covenant not to compete. [Fla. Stat. §§542.22, 542.335(1)(j)(k); Alonso-Llamazares v. Int’l Dermatology Rsch., Inc. , 339 So. 3d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (upholding in part issuance of temporary injunction to enforce non-compete agreement and reversing to require trial court ......