Alt v. Dines
Citation | 227 Mo. 418,126 S.W. 1035 |
Parties | ALT v. DINES et al. |
Decision Date | 12 April 1910 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Missouri |
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; Jesse A. McDonald, Judge.
Action by Marie Alt against William C. Dines and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Reversed and remanded.
Chester H. Krum, for appellants. Thos. S. Meng and S. T. G. Smith, for respondent.
The only items as of the record proper shown by the abstract are the petition, the demurrer, and the answer. An amendment to the abstract shows that the affidavit for an appeal was filed in due time and appeal allowed.
The petition is in the nature of a bill in equity to set aside a deed to real estate, on the ground that it was obtained by fraud on the part of defendant; it also prays for an accounting of rents and profits. Under the index heading of "Record aliunde" the abstract sets out the evidence, and at the conclusion of the evidence is this statement: The motion, which is there set out in full, assigns, besides other grounds, the action of the court, after setting aside the judgment of December 14th, in taking the cause under advisement and rendering another judgment, without a new trial or opportunity to defendant to be heard. Then follows a motion in arrest. Then follows this statement: — which motion is also copied in ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Kinealy v. Hostetter
... ... of the Supreme Court. Peper v. Peper, 241 Mo. 260; ... Fishback v. Prock, 242 S.W. 962; Haven v. Ry ... Co., 155 Mo. 216; Galy v. United Rys. Co., 286 ... Mo. 503; Paving Co. v. Realty & Imp. Co., 270 Mo ... 698; Porter v. Railroad Co., 28 S.W.2d 1035; Alt ... v. Dines, 227 Mo. 418; Hurley v. Kennally, 186 Mo. 225 ... Geers & Geers for respondents ... (1) The ... opinion of the St. Louis Court of Appeals, finding that the ... testimony in this case is not sufficient to establish an ... estoppel is borne out by the ... ...
-
Willis v. Willis
...and does not permit rendition of a new judgment without retrial [Davis v. Lynn, 354 Mo. 1181, 193 S.W.2d 609, 610(2); Alt v. Dines, 227 Mo. 418, 126 S.W. 1035, 1036(3); Hurley v. Kennally, 186 Mo. 225, 85 S.W. 357, 358(3, 4)]. None of the terms 'reopen', 'correct', 'amend' or 'modify', as u......
-
Ginnochio v. Illinois Central R. Co.
...S.W. 47; Coleman v. Roberts, 214 Mo. 634, 114 S.W. 39; Booth v. St. Louis, I. M., etc., R. Co., 217 Mo. 710, 117 S.W. 1094; Alt v. Dines, 227 Mo. 418, 126 S.W. 1035. See, Stone v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 150 Mo.App. 331, 130 S.W. 825.] The suit is prosecuted by the administrator of one, ......
-
Gosnell v. Gosnell
...another judgment should not have been rendered without retrial. Davis v. Lynn, 354 Mo. 1181, 193 S.W.2d 609, 610(2); Alt v. Dines, 227 Mo. 418, 126 S.W. 1035, 1036(3); Hurley v. Kennally, 186 Mo. 225, 85 S.W. 357, 358(3, 4); Willis v. Willis, Mo.App., 274 S.W.2d 621, 624(2). See also Jones ......