Alto v. Black, No. 12–56145.

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
Writing for the CourtBERZON
Citation738 F.3d 1111
PartiesAlbert P. ALTO; Andre E. Alto; Anthony Alto; Brandon Alto; Christy Alto; Christopher J. Alto; Daniel J. Alto, Jr.; Daniel J. Alto, Sr.; Dominique N. Alto; Raymond E. Alto, Sr.; Raymond E. Alto; Raymond J. Alto, a Representative for Ben Alto, deceased, Marcus M. Alto, deceased, Marcus R. Alto, deceased, David Gomez, deceased, Susan Martinez, deceased; Robert Alto; Ronald Alto, Sr.; Victoria (Alto) Ballew; Angela (Martinez–Mcneal) Ballon; Juan J. Ballon; Rebecca (Alto) Ballon; Ruby Ballon; Janice J. Banderas; Peter Banderas; Victor Banderas; David A. Brokiewicz; Diana Brokiewicz; Patricia D. Brokiewicz; Monica (Sepeda) Diaz; Anthony Forrester; Dustin Forrester; Johanna (Alto) Forrester; Sarah Forrester; Ernest Gomez; Henrietta (Alto) Gomez; Kathleen M. Gomez; Humberto R. Green; Lydia (Alto) Green; Paul Anthony Green; Mary Jo (Alto) Hurtado; Justin A. Islas; Cynthia (Sepeda) Ledesma; Destiny C. Ledesma; Amanda M. Minges; Isabelle M. Sepeda; Lupe Sepeda; Deborah L. Vargas; Desiree Vargas; Jeremiah Vargas; Jessiah Vargas; Terry Weight; Jason Alto; Carol Edith Cavazos; Aimee Renae Diaz; Daniel Gomez; Lisa Gomez Huntoon; Christine Martinez; Marlene M. Martinez; Cassandra Sepeda; Pamela J. Alto, as Guardian ad litem for Marcus M. Green, a minor; Pedro Banderas, as Guardian ad litem for Reina A. Banderas, a minor; Dawn Castillo, as Guardian ad litem for Alexis N. Ledesma, a minor, and Jesse Ledesma, a minor; Maria A. Perez–Rolon, as Guardian ad litem for Roland J. Alto, Jr., a minor; Martin Diaz, as Guardian ad litem for Jessica Diaz, a minor, Toni L. Diaz, a minor, and Jacob Diaz, a minor; Donald Martinez, as Guardian ad litem for Donelle Martinez, a minor, Justine Martinez, a minor, and Sabrina Martinez, a minor, Plaintiffs–Appellees, v. Michael BLACK, Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs of Department of Interior; Robert Eben, Superintendent of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Southern California Agency, of Department of Interior; Kevin K. Washburn, Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs of Department of Interior; Sally Jewell, Secretary of Department of Interior, Defendants–Appellees, and Doe, Defendants, 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendant, San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians, Intervenor–Appellant.
Decision Date26 December 2013
Docket NumberNo. 12–56145.
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
86 practice notes
  • Karnoski v. Trump, No. 18-35347
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • June 14, 2019
    ...that a significant change in facts or law warrants revision or dissolution of the injunction." Id . at 1170 ; see also Alto v. Black , 738 F.3d 1111, 1120 (9th Cir. 2013).B. We vacate the district court’s striking of Defendants’ motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction and remand for t......
  • Lennar Mare Island, LLC v. Steadfast Ins. Co., No. 2:12–cv–02182–KJM–KJN
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • October 16, 2015
    ...or hollow relief as to those already parties, and with precluding multiple lawsuits on the same cause of action.’ " Alto v. Black, 738 F.3d 1111, 1126 (9th Cir.2013) (quoting Disabled Rights Action Comm. v. Las Vegas Events, Inc., 375 F.3d 861, 879 (9th Cir.2004) ). "To be ‘complete,’ relie......
  • Kandi v. Langford, Case No. CV 17-3617 FMO(JC)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • November 14, 2018
    ...so that judges and adverse parties need not try to fish a gold coin from a bucket of mud.") (cited with approval in Knapp, 738 F.3d at 1111), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 968 (2003); cf., e.g., Independent Towers of Washington v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (declining to "sort t......
  • A. H. R. v. Wash. State Health Care Auth., CASE NO. C15-5701JLR
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Western District of Washington)
    • January 7, 2016
    ...partial or hollow relief as to those already parties, and with precluding multiple lawsuits on the same cause of action." Alto v. Black , 738 F.3d 1111, 1126 (9th Cir. 2013). To be "complete," relief must be "meaningful as between the parties." Id. (quoting Disabled Rights Action Comm. v. L......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
90 cases
  • Lennar Mare Island, LLC v. Steadfast Ins. Co., No. 2:12–cv–02182–KJM–KJN
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • October 16, 2015
    ...or hollow relief as to those already parties, and with precluding multiple lawsuits on the same cause of action.’ " Alto v. Black, 738 F.3d 1111, 1126 (9th Cir.2013) (quoting Disabled Rights Action Comm. v. Las Vegas Events, Inc., 375 F.3d 861, 879 (9th Cir.2004) ). "To be ‘complete,’ relie......
  • Kandi v. Langford, Case No. CV 17-3617 FMO(JC)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • November 14, 2018
    ...so that judges and adverse parties need not try to fish a gold coin from a bucket of mud.") (cited with approval in Knapp, 738 F.3d at 1111), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 968 (2003); cf., e.g., Independent Towers of Washington v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (declining to "sort t......
  • A. H. R. v. Wash. State Health Care Auth., CASE NO. C15-5701JLR
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Western District of Washington)
    • January 7, 2016
    ...partial or hollow relief as to those already parties, and with precluding multiple lawsuits on the same cause of action." Alto v. Black , 738 F.3d 1111, 1126 (9th Cir. 2013). To be "complete," relief must be "meaningful as between the parties." Id. (quoting Disabled Rights Action Comm. v. L......
  • Skokomish Indian Tribe v. Goldmark, Case No. C13–5071JLR.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Western District of Washington)
    • January 13, 2014
    ...if the party is required, but cannot be joined, whether, in “equity and good conscience,” the suit should be dismissed. Alto v. Black, 738 F.3d 1111, 1126 (9th Cir.2013); see also Dawavendewa, 276 F.3d at 1155 (citing Confederated Tribes v. Lujan, 928 F.2d 1496, 1498 (9th Cir.1991); Makah I......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT