Am. Agricultural Chem. Co v. Crawford
Decision Date | 23 November 1904 |
Citation | 48 S.E. 868,103 Va. 171 |
Court | Virginia Supreme Court |
Parties | AMERICAN AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL CO. v. KENNEDY & CRAWFORD. |
contracts—mutuality of engagement.
1. A contract by which plaintiff agrees to sell fertilizer, and defendants agree to buy, having no other consideration than their mutual promises, and providing that plaintiff may cancel it at any time, is void, for lack of mutuality of engagement, so that defendants may refuse to purchase, though plaintiff manufacture's the fertilizer, and puts it in sacks marked for them, and makes tender thereof.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Augusta County.
Action by the American Agricultural Chemical Company against Kennedy & Crawford. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the declaration, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
J. R. Fishburne and Jos. A. Glasgow, for appellant
A. C. Braxton, for appellee.
American Agricultural Chemical Company instituted its action of assumpsit against J. A. Kennedy and W. A. Crawford, partners doing business under the firm name of Kennedy & Crawford, to recover damages for the alleged breach of an agreement not under seal. The
The plaintiffs cause of action, as set forth in the third count of the declaration—the only count relied on—is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Westwood Ltd. v. Grayson
...must be bound, or neither is bound." Vinton v. Roanoke, 195 Va. 881, 896, 80 S.E.2d 608, 617 (1954); American Agricultural Chem. Co. v. Kennedy, 103 Va. 171, 176, 48 S.E. 868, 870 (1904).Capps v. Capps, 216 Va. 378, 381, 219 S.E.2d 901, 903 (1975). Here what is presented are agreements that......
-
Gile v. Interstate Motor Car Company, a Corporation
... ... 499; 114 ... C.C.A. 284, 194 F. 324; 40 Mich. 322, 29 Am. Rep. 530; ... American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Kennedy, 103 ... Va. 171, 48 S.E. 868; McKinley v. Watkins, 13 Ill ... 140; ... ...
-
Fransmart Llc v. Freshii Dev. Llc
...mutuality of engagement, so that each party has the right to hold the other to a positive agreement.” Am. Agric. Chem. Co. v. Kennedy & Crawford, 103 Va. 171, 48 S.E. 868, 870 (1904). Here, there is mutuality of contract because both parties have made enforceable promises. On one hand, Fran......
-
Sabet v. Eastern Virginia Medical Authority
...must be bound, or neither is bound." Capps v. Capps, 216 Va. 378, 219 S.E.2d 901, 903 (1975); American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Kennedy & Crawford, 103 Va. 171, 176, 48 S.E. 868, 870 (1904). Counsel are unable to advise of any mutual contractual understandings, but instead the plaintiff......