American Indemnity Co. v. Fellbaum
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Fly |
| Citation | American Indemnity Co. v. Fellbaum, 225 S.W. 873 (Tex. App. 1920) |
| Decision Date | 17 November 1920 |
| Docket Number | (No. 6448.) |
| Parties | AMERICAN INDEMNITY CO. v. FELLBAUM. |
Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; J. T. Sluder, Judge.
Suit by Ernest Fellbaum against the American Indemnity Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Arnold & Cozby, of San Antonio, for appellant.
McAskill & Mauermann, Perry J. Lewis, H. C. Carter, Champe G. Carter, and Randolph L. Carter, all of San Antonio, for appellee.
This is a suit by appellee, as administrator of the estate of M. D. Carr, deceased, against appellant, in which it is alleged that a judgment was obtained against appellee on March 3, 1917, by Douglas Stough for $4,000; that the judgment was based upon bodily injuries inflicted by M. D. Carr on the said Stough on or about September 27, 1915; that previously said M. D. Carr had obtained from the appellant a policy of insurance which indemnified him against such claims; and that such policy was in full force and effect when the injuries were inflicted. It was further alleged that the suit against him was pending when M. D. Carr died, and appellee was appointed administrator of his estate; that appellant took charge of the defense in said suit, as provided in the policy of insurance, both for Carr and the appellee, and had exclusive control of said suit. It was alleged that the judgment had been obtained and duly allowed and approved as a claim against the estate of M. D. Carr, and was paid in full by the administrator in the sum of $4,480. The defenses were that the cause of action died with M. D. Carr, and that the administrator borrowed money, without power or authority to do so, to pay off the judgment, and his action was not binding on the estate, and the note given for the borrowed money was not enforceable, and therefore the estate had sustained no loss. The cause was tried by the court and judgment rendered in favor of appellee for $4,760.
Although all the facts were agreed to by both parties, appellant requested the trial judge to file his findings of fact and conclusions of law; but, after the court had complied with the request, appellant sought to strike all out except the introductory sentence that, "The facts are found as set out in the agreed statement of facts." The first and second assignments of error complain of certain conclusions of fact to the effect that the note given by appellee to pay the judgment was executed in good faith and that the judgment was paid with the proceeds of the note. These conclusions were reasonably deducible from facts agreed to by appellant, which are as follows:
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Elliott v. Belt Auto. Ass'n
... ... by the Court ... SYLLABUS ... Interpretation ... giving greater indemnity will prevail. Where two ... interpretations equally fair may be given, that which gives ... the ... 571, 154 P. 1116, 155 P ... 1035, L. R. A. 1916D, 395, 398; American Indemnity Co. v ... Fellbaum (Tex. Civ. App.) 225 S.W. 873;[ELLIOTT V BELT ... AUTO ASS'N 100 ... ...
-
Ziegler v. Ryan
... ... 40, 171 A. 207; Graham v. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co., 308 Pa. 534, 162 A. 902; Indemnity Co. of ... America v. Pitts, Tex.Com.App., 58 S.W.2d 53; ... Solomon v. Preferred Accident Ins ... v. New York Indem. Co., 229 ... A.D. 232, 241 N.Y.S. 417; Reinhart v. Great American Mut ... Indem. Co., 25 Ohio N.P.,N.S., 331; Malley v ... American Indem. Corp., 297 Pa. 216, ... Co., 32 R.I. 246, 79 A. 1, Ann.Cas.1912D, 906; ... American Indemnity Co. v. Fellbaum, Tex.Civ.App., ... 225 S.W. 873; Id., 114 Tex. 127, 263 S.W. 908, 37 A.L.R. 633; ... Automobile ... ...
-
Ziegler v. Ryan, 8163
...A. 571, 81 ALR 1322; Humes Const. Co. v. Philadelphia Casualty Co., 32 R.I. 246, 79 A. 1, Ann. Cas. 1912D, 906; American Indemnity Co. v. Fellbaum, Tex. Civ. App., 225 S.W. 873; Id., 114 Tex. 127, 37 ALR 633; Automobile Underwriters’ Ins. Co. v. Murrah, Tex Civ. App., 40 SW2d 233; Fullerton......
-
Ulico Cas. Co. v. Allied Pilots Ass'n
...of its contract with insured, of the action brought against the insured to recover damages." Id. (quoting Am. Indem. Co. v. Fellbaum, 225 S.W. 873, 874 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1920), aff'd, 114 Tex. 127, 263 S.W. 908 (1924)). The Ferris court went on to cite Murrah; Dallas Coffee & Tea Co......