American Loan & Trust Co. v. Clark, 857.
Decision Date | 07 September 1897 |
Docket Number | 857. |
Parties | AMERICAN LOAN & TRUST CO. v. CLARK et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Edward W. Sheldon, for appellant.
W. R Kelly, for appellees.
Before THAYER, Circuit Judge, and RINER, District Judge.
Upon a bill filed for that purpose by Oliver Ames, Second, and others, in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Nebraska, and in the circuit courts of other districts through which the railway lines of the Union Pacific Railway system as then constituted extended, Silas H H. Clark, Oliver W. Mink, E. Ellery Anderson, John W. Doane and Frederic R. Coudert, the appellees, were in October and November, 1893, appointed receivers of the Union Pacific System, which included, in addition to the lines of railway and property of the Union Pacific Railway Company, the lines of railway and property of the Denver, Leadville & Gunnison Railway Company and several other corporations. The receivers above named continued to operate the Denver, Leadville & Gunnison Railway as a part of the Union Pacific Railway System until the 7th day of August, 1894, when they surrendered possession of the property to Frank Trumbull, who had been appointed receiver of the property by the circuit court for the district of Colorado in a foreclosure suit brought by the American Loan & Trust Company, as trustee against the Denver, Leadville & Gunnison Railway Company. On June 26, 1894, the receivers of the Union Pacific System filed a petition in the circuit court praying for instructions as to the continuance by them of the operation of lines of railway owned by certain of the defendants named in the original bill in the Ames Case, and included in the Union Pacific System whose earnings were represented to be insufficient to pay their operating expenses and taxes, the Denver, Leadville & Gunnison Railway Company being one of the lines mentioned. The court directed service of the petition to be made upon the parties interested, including the appellant and the Denver, Leadville & Gunnison Railway Company, and set the cause down for hearing. At the hearing an order of reference to the special master was made directing him, among other things, to Hearings were had before the master, who found that the deficiency arising from the operation of the Denver, Leadville & Gunnison Railway from 'October 13, 1893, to August 7, 1894, was $207,201.83, and that the receivers of the Union Pacific System had turned over to the receiver of the Denver, Leadville & Gunnison Railway Company $48,870.15 worth of supplies, and recommended that the amounts for the deficiency and supplies be charged as a first lien on the property, in priority to the lien of the mortgage to the appellant. The American Loan & Trust Company filed exceptions to this report. May 9, 1896, the exceptions of the American Loan & Trust Company and the evidence taken before the master, together with his report, were submitted to the court. The court modified the findings of the master as to two items contained in his report, and decreed the amount of the deficiency resulting from the operation of the property to be $192,630.17, which, with interest at the rate of 8 per cent. per annum from August 7, 1894, 'constitutes a lien in favor of said receivers upon the property of the Denver, Leadville & Gunnison Railway Company, prior in right and superior in equity to the mortgage thereon dated August 1, 1889, and to all other liens and incumbrances upon said property, and should be enforced in the decree of foreclosure of said mortgage to be entered in the district of Colorado. ' It further decreed 'that Frank Trumbull, the present receiver of said property, is indebted to the five receivers, appellees herein, in the sum of $48,870.15, with interest from August 7, 1894, at the rate of eight per cent. per annum, for materials and supplies furnished by them to him for use in the operation of the railroads of that company when they surrendered the same to him, on August 7, 1894; and that said amount and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Grand Island & W.C.R. Co. v. Sweeney
... ... [103 F. 345] ... 545; ... Davis v. Trust Co., 152 U.S. 590, 14 Sup.Ct. 693, 38 ... L.Ed. 563; Trust Co. v. Clark, 83 F. 230, 27 C.C.A ... 522. It is clear, we think, by ... ...
-
Gray v. Grand Forks Mercantile Co.
... ... Fletcher, 24 C.C.A. 69, ... 78 F. 214; American Loan & Trust Co. v. Clark, 27 ... C.C.A. 522, 83 F. 230; ... ...
-
McLean v. Jaffray
...in the following cases: Trust Co. v. McClure, 78 F. 211, 24 C. C. A. 66; Dodson v. Fletcher, 78 F. 214, 24 C. C. A. 69; Trust Co. v. Clark, 83 F. 230, 27 C. C. A. 522; and in Boyd v. Railroad Co., 84 F. 9, 28 C. C. A. 262. In Dodson v. Fletcher, supra, the rule is stated thus: `All the part......
-
Grand Island & W.C.R. Co. v. Sweeney
... ... dismissed, on the strength of the following cases: Trust ... Co. v. Clark, 49 U.S.App. 571, 27 C.C.A. 522, and 83 ... ...