American Mfg Co v. City of St Louis
Citation | 39 S.Ct. 522,250 U.S. 459,63 L.Ed. 1084 |
Decision Date | 09 June 1919 |
Docket Number | No. 365,365 |
Parties | AMERICAN MFG. CO. v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS. * |
Court | United States Supreme Court |
Messrs. S. Mayner Wallace and Shepard Barclay, both of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Everett Paul Griffin and Charles H. Daues, both of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant in error.
The question is whether an ordinance of the city of St. Louis levying against manufacturers, especially as against plaintiff in error, a West Virginia corporation, a tax imposed as a condition of the grant of a license to carry on a manufacturing business in that city, but the amount of which is ascertained by and proportioned to the amount of sales of the manufactured goods, whether sold within or without the state, and whether in domestic or interstate commerce, is void as amounting to a regulation of commerce among the states and thus entrenching upon the power of the national Congress under article 1, § 8, of the Constitution, or as amounting to a taking of plaintiff's property without due process of law, in contravention of the Fourteenth Amendment.
A statute of the state (Rev. Stat. Mo. 1909, § 9857) authorizes cities to license, tax and regulate for local purposes the occupations of merchants and manufacturers and to graduate the amount of annual license imposed upon them in proportion to the sales made by such merchant or manufacturer during the year next preceding any fixed date. Pursuant to this authority the city, by the ordinance in question, in addition to an ad valorem property tax, requires every manufacturer in the city before doing or offering to do business as such to take out a license, and at a specified time to render a sworn statement of the aggregate amount of sales made by him during the year next preceding the first Monday of June, and within a short time thereafter to pay a license tax of $1 on each $1,000 of sales made. Failure or refusal to deliver the required statement or to pay the license tax within the time specified is made a misdemeanor punishable by fine and false statement under oath is made punishable false statement under oath is made punishable by forfeiture of the license in addition to a fine.
In a previous case (Manufacturing Co. v. St. Louis, 238 Mo. 267, 278, 142 S. W. 297), the Supreme Court of the state held that this tax did not apply to sales made of goods shipped from plaintiff's factory in the state of New York directly to purchasers in Texas, but only to sales from its St. Louis factory.
Int he present case, which was a suit brought in a state court by plaintiff in error against the city to recover so much of a disputed tax as is measured by sales of goods manufactured by plaintiff in the city, afterwards removed to storage warehouses outside of the state, and later sold from these warehouses to purchasers in states other than Missouri, the trial court at first gave judgment in favor of plaintiff on this item, and this having been reversed by the Supreme Court of the state (270 Mo. 40, 192 S. W. 402), a new trial resulting in favor of the city, and the second judgment having been affirmed (Mo., 198 S. W. 1183), the case comes here on writ of error.
In construing the statute and ordinance and defining the nature and effect of the tax, the Supreme Court expressed itself as follows (270 Mo. p. 45, 192 S. W. 403):
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State Tax Commission v. John H. Breck, Inc.
...Compare Memphis Natural Gas Co. v. Stone, 335 U.S. 80, 89, 68 S.Ct. 1475, 92 L.Ed. 1832. Compare also American Mfg. Co. v. St. Louis, 250 U.S. 459, 463, 39 S.Ct. 522, 63 L.Ed. 1084 (sustaining a license tax on manufacturing in St. Louis measured by value of manufactured goods sold, payable ......
-
Chassanoil v. City of Greenwood
... ... commerce ... Lawrence ... v. Commission, 286 U.S. 280, 76 L.Ed. 1106; Nashville, ... Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. Wallace, U. S. Supreme ... Court, Feb. 7, 1933; Anglo-Chilean Nitrate Sales ... Corp. v. Alabama, U. S. Sup. Ct., Feb. 6, 1933; ... could levy a privilege tax upon the person engaged in the ... business of buying such cotton ... American ... Mfg. Co. v. City of St. Louis, 250 U.S. 459, 63 ... L.Ed. 1084; Atlantic Coast Line Ry. Co. v. Standard Oil ... Co., 72 L.Ed. 270; Brown ... ...
-
Martin Ship Service Co. v. City of Los Angeles
...on intrastate manufacturing, added to an ad valorem tax and measured by sales, including out of state, American Mfg. Co. v. St. Louis, 250 U.S. 459, 39 S.Ct. 522, 63 L.Ed. 1084, and see Powell, 60 Harv.L.Rev. 508, and 727, Freeman v. Hewit, 329 U.S. 249, 255, 67 S.Ct. 274, 91 L.Ed. 265; a l......
-
Diefendorf v. Gallet
... ... Co. v. Lord, 262 U.S. 172, 43 S.Ct. 526, 67 L.Ed. 929; ... American Mfg. Co. v. St. Louis, 250 U.S. 459, 39 ... S.Ct. 522, [51 Idaho 622] 63 L.Ed. 1084; Spreckels ... the privilege of using the highways for business purposes. ( ... City of St. Louis v. Western Union T. Co. , 148 U.S ... 92, [51 Idaho 642] 148 U.S. 92, 13 S.Ct. 485, ... ...