American Motorists Ins. Co. v. Brookman

Decision Date10 April 1984
Citation193 Conn. 801,473 A.2d 1226
PartiesAMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY v. Lynda BROOKMAN et al.
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court

David M. Reilly, New Haven, in support of the petition.

Marshall S. Feingold, Hartford, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 1 Conn.App. 219, 470 A.2d 253, is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • American Universal Ins. Co. v. DelGreco, 13067
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • September 1, 1987
    ... ... 186] Waterbury v. Waterbury Police Union, supra, 176 Conn. at 403, 407, 407 A.2d 1013; American Motorists Ins. Co. v. Brookman, 1 Conn.App. 219, 221-22, 470 A.2d 253, cert. denied, 193 Conn. 801, 473 A.2d 1226 (1984). Thus, in determining whether an ... ...
  • Local 530, AFSCME, Council 15 v. City of New Haven
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • December 9, 1986
    ...231, 445 A.2d 322 (1982). American Motorists Ins. Co. v. Brookman, 1 Conn.App. 219, 221-22, 470 A.2d 253 (1984), cert. denied, 193 Conn. 801, 473 A.2d 1226 (1984); State v. Connecticut Council 4, CEU, AFSCME, 7 Conn.App. 286, 289, 508 A.2d 806 (1986); Hartford v. Local 760, 6 Conn.App. 11, ......
  • City of Hartford v. Local 760, Intern. Ass'n of Firefighters, AFL-CIO
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • January 7, 1986
    ...61, 65, 496 A.2d 539 (1985); American Motorists Ins. Co. v. Brookman, 1 Conn.App. 219, 222, 470 A.2d 253, cert. denied, 193 Conn. 801, 473 A.2d 1226 (1984). The submission defines the scope of the entire arbitration proceedings by specifically delineating the issues to be decided and no mat......
  • Wilson v. Security Ins. Group
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • May 13, 1986
    ...owned by the claimant and her husband. American Motorists Ins. Co. v. Brookman, 1 Conn.App. 219, 470 A.2d 253, cert. denied, 193 Conn. 801, 473 A.2d 1226 (1984). We see no reasonable basis for viewing § 38-175c(a)(1) as mandating arbitration of only those coverage issues governed wholly by ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT