American Nat. Bank v. National Wall-Paper Co.
Decision Date | 05 November 1896 |
Docket Number | 718. |
Citation | 77 F. 85 |
Parties | AMERICAN NAT. BANK v. NATIONAL WALL-PAPER CO. [1] |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
The American National Bank of Denver, the plaintiff in error, was a creditor of A. Gauthier, a wall-paper and paint merchant doing business in Denver, in a sum exceeding $14,000. To secure payment of this sum, the bank attached the entire stock of its debtor, which was afterwards sold under the attachment by the sheriff, and purchased by the bank, or by one of the bank's agents or officers in trust for the bank. Not being able to effect a lump sale of the stock, the bank was compelled to sell the goods at retail, and to secure a proper agency for that purpose it caused a corporation to be organized styled in A. Gauthier Decorating Company, to whom it turned over the stock, to be managed and sold for the benefit of the bank. To work off the old stock successfully, it was necessary to buy fresh goods from time to time. These fresh goods were ordered in the name of the bank's dummy corporation, namely, the A. Gauthier Decorating Company, from the defendant in error. The following is a copy of the heading of one of these orders:
'Ordered of Creswell & Washburn.
'By A. Gauthier Dec. Co.
'Bundles.
Here follows a description of the goods ordered.
On receipt of the first order, and before filling the same, the defendant in error addressed to the A. Gauthier Decoration Company, the following letter:
Thereupon the following correspondence took place between the defendant in error on the one side and the plaintiff in error and the A. Gauthier Decorating Company on the other:
'Telephone 621.
'The A. Gauthier Decorating Co., 916-918 Fifteenth St.
'Denver, Colo., Oct. 7th, 1892.
'Yours, etc., The A. Gauthier Decorating Co.
'By C. Westervelt, Sec'y and Trea'r.'
'National Wall-Paper Co., 1286 Broadway.
'New York, N.Y., Oct. 10, 1892.
'Yours truly, National Wall-Paper Company, Credit Mn'gr.'
'American National Bank of Denver. Capital, $1,000,000.
'Denver, Colo., 29th Sept., 1892.
'Messrs. Creswell & Washburn, 18th and Washington Ave., Philadelphia, Pen.--Gentlemen: Your letter of the 26th instant to the A. Gauthier Decorating Company has been referred to me, and I will say that this company is perfectly solvent, and at its request I will state that the amount of the bill for the order, a copy of which is inclosed, will be paid by us when approved by the company in case they do not pay it.
'Yours, truly,
Howard Evans, Cashier.' 'October 24th, 1892. 'Mr. Howard Evans, Cashier, Denver, Colo.-- Dear Sir: Your favor under date of Sept. 29th to the Creswell & Washburn branch has been referred to this office, and in accordance with the condition therein we have accepted all the orders from the various branches of the company for the A. Gauthier Dec. Co. received to date. We do this with the understanding that your bank is responsible for the payment of the bills of all orders made to date.
Yours, truly, National Wall-Paper Co., Credit Mn'gr.'
'The American National Bank of Denver.
'Denver, Colo., 27th Oct. 1892.
'National Wall-Paper Co., 1286 Broadway, New York-- Gentlemen: Your favor of the 24th in reference to an order from the A. Gauthier Decorating Co. is received. I do not quite understand your letter. You say that you have accepted all the orders from the various branches of the company received from the A. Gauthier Decorating Co. I only know of one order that we agreed to become responsible for.
'Yours truly,
Howard Evans, Cashier.'
'Oct. 31, 1892.
'Yours, truly, National Wall-Paper Company, Credit Mn'gr.'
'Yours, truly, The A. Gauthier Decorating-- Cashier.
'
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wegner v. First National Bank of Casselton
... ... v. Upham (N.D.) 166 N.W. 507; ... Cottondale Bank v. Oskham Nolte Co. 59 So. 566; ... Third Nat. Bank v. Savings Bank, 244 Mo. 554, 149 ... S.W. 495; Ayr v. Hughes, 87 S.C. 382, 69 S.E. 657; ... Nat. Bank v. First Nat. Bank, 104 Am. St. Rep. 879; ... First Nat. Bank v. American Nat. Bank, 173 Mo. 153, ... 72 S.W. 1059; First Nat. Bank v. Sixth Nat. Bank, ... 212 Pa. 238, 61 ... State Bank v. First Nat ... Bank, 248 F. 679; American Bank v. National Wall ... Paper Co. 77 F. 85; Bank v. Pire, 82 F. 799; ... Towle v. Investment Co. 78 F. 688 ... ...
-
MacFadden v. Jenkins
... ... statutes form a departure from the American common law on the ... subject prevailing in most states, ... Stockridge (Mich.) ... 99 N.W. 759; Copsey v. Bank (Cal.) 66 P. 8; ... Clark v. Eaton, 100 U.S. 146; Gray ... 49; LePage Co ... v. Cement Co., 51 F. 941; Am. Nat. Bank v. Paper ... Co., 77 F. 85; Young & Co. v. Lock ... Read, 84 N.Y ... 556; Washburn v. National Wall Paper Co., 26 C. C ... A. 312, 81 F. 17; Wilmer v ... ...
-
United States Fidelity Co. v. First State Bank
... ... standing. Having carried an account with the National City ... Bank of Memphis for several years, an agent of the First ... enter into such a contract. See, also, Bushnell v. Chataqa ... Co. Nat. Bank, 10 Hun. (N. Y.) 378 ... The ... bank actually received ... C. A. 399, 97 ... F. 739; Am. Nat. Bank v. National Wall-Paper Co., 23 ... C. C. A. 33, 77 F. 85; Hutchins v. Planters National ... 992; pamphlet page 37; First ... National Bank v. American National Bank of Missouri, 72 ... S.W. 1060, pamphlet page 41; Appleton ... ...
-
In re Kentucky Wagon Mfg. Co.
...Tel. Co. v. B. & O. Tel. Co. (C. C.) 51 F. 49; Glidden & Joy V. Co. v. Interstate Nat. Bank (C. C. A.) 69 F. 912; Am. Nat. Bank v. Nat. Wall Paper Co. (C. C. A.) 77 F. 85; Cockrill v. Abeles (C. C. A.) 86 F. 505; Wallerstein v. Ervin (C. C. A.) 112 F. 124, 126; Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. Dupon......