American Seeding Machine Company v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Decision Date15 March 1915
Docket NumberNo. 175,175
PartiesAMERICAN SEEDING MACHINE COMPANY, Plff. in Err., v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Messrs. J. E. Bowman and Alexander Pope Humphrey for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

Memorandum opinion by Mr. Justice McKenna, by direction of the court:

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the circuit court of Barren county, Kentucky, and fined for alleged violation of §§ 3915 and 3941a of the Kentucky laws commonly known as the Kentucky Anti-trust Statutes, and prosecutes this writ to review the judgment.

The grounds of error assigned are: (1) That the statutes in question are in conflict with the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; (2) that the particular transactions involved were transactions of interstate commerce, and protected from state regulation by the commerce clause of the Constitution of the United States.

These grounds were presented to the lower court first by demurrer, which was overruled, and, after answer and trial to a jury, by a request for peremptory instructions for defendant.

The sections of the laws of Kentucky referred to were declared to be invalid by this court under the 14th Amendment because they, as construed by the court of appeals of the state, offered no standard of conduct that it is possible to know. International Harvester Co. v. Kentucky, 234 U. S. 216, 58 L. ed. 1284, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 853. Therefore, the judgment of conviction against plaintiff in error must be reversed.

It is not necessary to pass on any other question.

Judgment reversed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • Cline v. Frink Dairy Co
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • May 31, 1927
    ...S. Ct. 853, 58 L. Ed. 1284; Collins v. Kentucky, 234 U. S. 635, 637, 34 S. Ct. 924, 58 L. Ed. 1510; American Seeding Machine Co. v. Kentucky, 236 U. S. 660, 662, 35 S. Ct. 456, 59 L. Ed. 773. The Colorado anti-trust law denounces conspiracies and combinations of persons and corporation, fir......
  • Graff v. Priest
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 21, 1947
    ...Ed. 1510; International Harvester Co. v. Kentucky, 234 U.S. 216, 34 S. Ct. 853, 58 L. Ed. 1284; American Seeding Machine Co. v. Kentucky, 236 U.S. 660, 35 S. Ct. 456, 59 L. Ed. 773. (5) The act of the 63rd General Assembly here in question is illegal, null, void, of no effect and unenforcea......
  • State v. A. H. Read Co.
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • October 22, 1925
    ... ... The A ... H. Read Company was charged with the violation of the eight ... Inter. Harv. Co. vs. Kentucky, 234 U.S. 216, 58 L ... ed. 1284; Collins vs ... 639, 58 L. ed. 1512; ... American Seeding Machine Co. vs. Ky., 236 U.S. 660, ... thereof. In a Kentucky case, Commonwealth v ... Galloway, 203 Ky. 102, 261 S.W. 887, the ... ...
  • People v. Maki
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • January 7, 1929
    ...U. S. 216, 34 S. Ct. 853, 58 L. Ed. 1284;Collins v. Ky., 234 U. S. 634, 34 S. Ct. 924, 58 L. Ed. 1510;American Seeding Machine Co. v. Ky., 236 U. S. 660, 35 S. Ct. 456, 59 L. Ed. 773), or which fails to fix with reasonable certainty the elements of the offense, because violative of the due ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT