American States Ins. Co. v. Cooper

Decision Date06 November 1987
Citation518 So.2d 708
PartiesAMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY v. James H. COOPER and Lakeside Properties of Auburn. CONSTITUTION STATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. James H. COOPER and Lakeside Properties of Auburn. 86-986, 86-987 and 86-1021.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Robert S. Lamar, Jr., of Lamar & McDorman, Birmingham, for appellant American States Ins. Co.

Richard A. Ball, Jr., and Joana S. Ellis of Ball, Ball, Duke & Matthews, Montgomery, for appellant Constitution State Ins. Co.

Joe Espy III of Melton & Espy, Montgomery, for appellees.

SHORES, Justice.

These are appeals from a declaratory judgment. Plaintiffs James H. Cooper and Lakeside Properties of Auburn sought declarations of insurance coverage with respect to two underlying lawsuits against them. The underlying suits arose from the sales of two apartment complexes in Lee County.

In the first suit, Lakeside, Ltd., purchasers of one complex, allege that the sellers, James Cooper and Lakeside Properties of Auburn, a general partnership, misrepresented the number of units that were preleased, and that Cooper assured them that, based on present and anticipated market conditions, the complex would always be fully occupied. They contend that the representations were made intentionally with knowledge, recklessly without knowledge, or innocently by mistake. As injuries, the purchasers claim that they lost part of their investment and lost profits that they would have made had the complex been as represented, that their credit standing was damaged, and, further, that they suffered mental anguish.

The second action was brought by the purchaser of a second apartment complex, sold by James H. Cooper and Lakeside, Ltd. The purchaser alleged that the age of the complex, as well as its general condition, was misrepresented to him by Cooper, and, that as a result, he, the purchaser, suffered mental anguish and economic loss. The complaint alleges that these misrepresentations were made intentionally with knowledge, recklessly without knowledge, or innocently by mistake.

Both insurers, American States Insurance Company and Constitution State Insurance Company, contend that the above-stated allegations are not covered under the provisions of their policies issued to Cooper. The trial court held otherwise, and ordered the two insurers to defend and indemnify Cooper with regard to the misrepresentation claims. The insurers appealed. We affirm, and adopt the well-reasoned order of Judge Phelps as the opinion of this Court.

"This matter is presently before the Court on the Bill for Declaratory Judgment heretofore filed by James H. Cooper and Lakeside Properties of Auburn against American States Insurance Company (American) and Constitution State Insurance Company (Constitution). Two cases, each styled Cooper v. American States Insurance Company, have been consolidated for purposes of the declaratory judgment. Three underlying damages suits, Lakeside, Ltd. v. Lakeside Properties of Auburn, Patel v. Lakeside Properties of Auburn, and Lakeside Properties of Auburn v. T & H Properties, have been stayed pending the decision in the declaratory judgment cases.

"In the underlying damages cases, the Plaintiffs allege fraud against the Defendants for representations which were 'false and were made intentionally with knowledge of their falsity, recklessly without knowledge, or innocently and by mistake.' The Plaintiffs further allege that 'as a proximate consequence of said misrepresentations' they suffered 'Mental anguish.' The Defendants in these damages cases seek a declaratory judgment to the effect that American and Constitution are obligated to defend and indemnify them with respect to those underlying damage suits. Oral argument was heard by the Court on August 28, 1986. The Court, having considered the arguments and briefs of counsel, is of the opinion that the Declaratory Judgment is due to be rendered in favor of Cooper and Lakeside Properties of Auburn.

"An insurance company's duty to defend its insured is determined by the language of the insurance policy and by the allegations in the complaint giving rise to the suit against the insured. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Armstrong, 479 So.2d 1164 (Ala.1985). If the allegations accuse the insured of actions for which the insurance company provides protection, the insurance company is obligated to defend the insured. Armstrong, supra; see also, Ladner & Co. v. Southern Guaranty Ins. Co., 347 So.2d 100 (Ala.1977) Thus, it is necessary to look first to the allegations in the complaints and second to the language of the insurance policies.

"The Plaintiffs in the case of Lakeside Ltd. v. Lakeside Properties of Auburn (the Lakeside suit) allege that on or about August 2, 1985, they purchased from Cooper an apartment complex in reliance upon misrepresentations, made to them by Cooper, that 50% of the available rental for the complex had been preleased for the upcoming school term, that certain income projections for the complex made by Cooper were conservative, and that the complex would always be occupied. The Plaintiffs further allege that they suffered economic loss and mental anguish as a result of the misrepresentations.

"The Plaintiff in Lakeside Properties v. T & H Properties (the T & H suit) sues to collect $83,200.00, interest, costs, and attorney's fees which Plaintiff alleges are due and owing on a note and guaranty agreement executed by T & H Properties on July 31, 1985.

"The Plaintiff in Patel v. Lakeside Properties of Auburn (the Patel suit) alleges that in November 1985 he purchased an apartment complex from Cooper. He alleges that this purchase was made in reliance upon misrepresentations by Cooper to the effect that the apartment complex was 10 years old and in very good condition; he also alleges that Cooper failed to disclose that the complex was in need of repair. Patel further alleges that he has suffered economic losses and mental anguish as a result of the misrepresentations.

"The 'Comprehensive General Liability Coverage' of American States' policy provides, in part, as follows:

" 'The company will pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of--

Coverage A. bodily injury or--

Coverage B. property damage to which this insurance applies caused by an occurrence, and the company...

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 cases
  • Madison Cnty. v. Evanston Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • September 28, 2018
    ... ... EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants Case No. 5:15-cv-01997-HNJ United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Northeastern Division. Signed September 28, 2018 As Amended November ... and by the allegations in the complaint giving rise to the action against the insured." American States Insurance Co. v. Cooper , 518 So.2d 708 (Ala. 1987) (internal citation omitted). Therefore, ... ...
  • SL Industries, Inc. v. American Motorists Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • June 17, 1992
    ... ... v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 68 Ill.App.3d 807, 25 Ill.Dec. 258, 265, 386 N.E.2d 529, 536 (1979) ...         Many states agree that the duty to defend is triggered not only by the allegations in the complaint, but by the later discovery of relevant facts. As Appleman ... An intent to misrepresent is sufficient to presume an intent to injure. American States Ins. Co. v. Cooper, 518 So.2d 708, 710 (Ala.1987); see also International Ins. v. West Am. Ins., 208 Cal.App.3d 117, 255 Cal.Rptr. 912, 917-18 (1989) (allegation of ... ...
  • Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. Cowan
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • May 16, 1997
    ... ... American Physicians Ins. Exch. v. Garcia, 876 S.W.2d 842, 847-48 (Tex.1994). "If a petition does not allege ... Co. v. Culcasi, 229 Cal.App.3d 209, 280 Cal.Rptr. 766, 772 (1991, review denied); Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Crosby, 244 Ga. 456, 260 S.E.2d 860, 862 (1979) (use of the term "bodily" in the ... v. Shrigley, 26 F.Supp. 625, 627-28 (W.D.Ark.1939) ... 3 See American States Ins. Co. v. Cooper, 518 So.2d 708, 710 (Ala.1987); First Ins. Co. v. Lawrence, 77 Hawai'i 2, 881 P.2d 489, 494 ... ...
  • Madison Cnty. v. Evanston Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • November 2, 2018
    ... ... EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants Case No. 5:15-cv-01997-HNJ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION November 2, 2018 AMENDED ... and by the allegations in the complaint giving rise to the action against the insured." American States Insurance Co ... v ... Cooper , 518 So. 2d 708 (Ala. 1987)(internal citation omitted) ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT