American Water Development, Inc. v. City of Alamosa, s. 92SA141

Citation874 P.2d 352
Decision Date09 May 1994
Docket NumberNos. 92SA141,92SA263,s. 92SA141
PartiesAMERICAN WATER DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Colorado corporation, Applicant-Appellant, v. CITY OF ALAMOSA; County of Alamosa; Alexander Ranch; Darell Keith Alexander; Richard Angell; Baca Grande Water & Sanitation District; Fred Bauder; Harold L. Bennett; Richard Blumenhein; Bonanza Road Water Users, Owners and Objectors; Lena C. Chiles; Floyd D. Chiles; Terry R. Chiles; Cyril Clayton; Dave Collins; David P. Collins; Barbara J. Collins; Colorado Division of Wildlife; Colorado Water Conservation Board; Columbine Telephone Company; Conejos Water Conservancy District; Concerned Citizens of Crestone, Colorado and Vicinity; Richard E. Conour; Elizabeth A. Conour; Cotton Creek Ranch; Town of Crestone; Fred J. Davie; Douglas M. Davie; Michael R. Dennet; Tom Enos; Dennis L. Felmlee; Oliver Powell Roemer, III, Successor Trustee Under the Trusts Under the Will of Avis Neal Roemer; First Pegasus Corporation; Freel Ranch; Eugene W. Freel; Beverly Freel; Harold L. Freel; Terry Lee Freel; Fullenwider Ranch, Inc.; Ernest Lamar Goodwin; Haidakhandi Universal Ashram; Ernest T. Harer; Grace Harer; Richard W. Hanby; Pamyla Hill; D. Robin Hood; Town of Hooper; J. Richard Johnston; Mary A. Johnston; L.D. Ranch; Town of LaJara; Henry R. Lamm; Mable A. Lamm; John N. Lawrence; KSD, Ltd.; Lazy KV Estates Homeowners Association, Inc.; Timothy N. Lovato; Lori S. Lovato; Marold Ranches; R.G. Marold; Barbara Mertian; A & M Farms; Pamela Bertin; Phillip Briscoe; Debra Briscoe; Eddie Clayton; Wayne C. Davis; Maggi Dessain; Margarita Diaz; Melvin E. Getz; Julie Goodnight; Greg Gosar; Margaret N. Herzfield; Maggie Houston-Smith; Pamela L. Lunt; Phil Martinez; Messick Farms; Richard A. Messick; Douglas G. Messick; Richard L. Messick; Sandra J. Murray; Curtis W. Nelson; Anne Silver Philleo; Robert S. Philleo; Marlene L. Pruitt; Robert A. Ress; Toni G. Romero; Marianne Sandstrom; Robert W. Simpson; W.E. Sisemote; C. Kimberly Snider; Francis E. Snider; M. Catherine Snider; Shella Snider; Katherine Steichen; Ha
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
Owners, Inc., City of Alamosa, Town of Monte Vista, Town of LaJara, Town of Crestone, County of Saguache, Alamosa County, Rio Grande County, and Rio Grande County Com'rs

Gale A. Norton, Atty. Gen., Raymond T. Slaughter, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Timothy M. Tymkovich, Sol. Gen., Patricia S. Bangert, Deputy Atty. Gen., Jennifer L. Gimbel, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Christine A. Klein, Bradley W. Cameron, Thomas W. Gibb, Asst. Attys. Gen., Natural Resources Section, Denver, for State of CO, CO Div. of Wildlife, CO Water Conservation Bd., and State and Div. Engineers for Water Div. 3.

Bruce McMillen, Saguache, for Richard Blumenhein, Bonanza Road Water Users, Owners and Objectors, David P. Collins, Barbara J. Collins, Ernest Lamar Goodwin, Lazy KV Estates Homeowners Ass'n, Inc., Marold Ranches, R.G. Marold, Loren Santisteven, Julie Santisteven, and Villa Grove Area Water Users, Owners and Opposers.

Janet Reno, U.S. Atty. Gen., Robert L. Klarquist, Atty., Appellate Section, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Div., Washington, DC, Michael J. Norton, U.S. Atty., James J. Dubois, Atty., General Litigation Section, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Div., Denver, for U.S.

Fred Bauder, pro se.

Moses, Wittemyer, Harrison and Woodruff, P.C., David L. Harrison, Raphael J. Moses, Steven P. Jeffers, Boulder, for Conejos Water Conservancy Dist., Oliver Powell Roemer, III, Successor Trustee under the trusts under the will of Avis Neal Roemer, and Howard R. Platz, Oasis Land and Cattle Corp.

No appearance for objectors-appellees Alexander Ranch, Darell Keith Alexander, Richard Angell, Baca Grande Water & Sanitation Dist., Harold L. Bennett, Lena C. Chiles, Floyd D. Chiles, Terry R. Chiles, Cyril Clayton, Dave Collins, Columbine Telephone Co., Concerned Citizens of Crestone, CO and Vicinity, Richard E. Conour, Elizabeth A. Conour, Cotton Creek Ranch, Fred J. Davie, Douglas M. Davie, Michael R. Dennet, Tom Enos, Dennis L. Felmlee, First Pegasus Corp., Freel Ranch, Eugene W. Freel, Beverly Freel, Harold L. Freel, Terry Lee Freel, Fullenwider Ranch, Inc., Haidakhandi Universal Ashram, Ernest T. Harer, Grace Harer, Richard W. Hanby, Pamyla Hill, D. Robin Hood, Town of Hooper, J. Richard Johnston, Mary A. Johnston, L.D. Ranch, Henry R. Lamm, Mable A. Lamm, John N. Lawrence, KSD, Ltd., Timothy N. Lovato, Lori S. Lovato, Barbara Mertian, A & M Farms, Pamela Bertin, Phillip Briscoe, Debra Briscoe, Eddie Clayton, Wayne C. Davis, Maggi Dessain, Margarita Diaz, Melvin E. Getz, Julie Goodnight, Greg Gosar, Margaret N. Herzfield, Maggie Houston-Smith, Pamela L. Lunt, Phil Martinez, Messick Farms, Richard A. Messick, Douglas G. Messick, Richard L. Messick, Sandra J. Murray, Curtis W. Nelson, Gayle Nichols, Anne Silver Philleo, Robert S. Philleo, Marlene L. Pruitt, Robert A. Ress, Toni G. Romero, Marianne Sandstrom, Robert W. Simpson, W.E. Sisemote, C. Kimberly Snider, Francis E. Snider, M. Catherine Snider, Shella Snider, Katherine Steichen, Harvey V. Sullivan, Liz Washburn, John R. Wright, George Whitten, Jr., Donald E. Whitten, Karen Whitten, Betty L. Worley, Town of Moffat, Jimmy R. Moore, Mary Moore, Morfitt Bros. Farm, Inc., Darrel Neese, Harold Neese, Gayle A. Nichols, Edward R. Oliver, Otaka Intern., Robert A. Owens, Edwin Pace, Rio Grande County Farm Bureau, Rito Alto and San Luis Ranches, Inc., Rito Alto Ranch, Inc., Rito Alto Ranchers, Arthur L. Rivale, Ileen J. Rivale, Rocky Mountain Bison, Inc., Thomas C. Sanderson, Town of Saguache, Neil F. Seitz, Valley View Hot Springs, Martin T. Shellabarger, Patricia Shellabarger, Kenneth L. Skoglund, Mary F. Skoglund, Spiritual Life Institute of America, Inc., David G. Stagner, Travelers Ins. Co., Thomas F. Trim, Annabelle R. Trim, Wagner Ranch, Ltd., John H. Wagner, Weiss Ranches, Inc., A.L. Wood, John M. Woodard, Erwin Young, and Lynne Young.

No appearance for objector-respondent Gayle Nichols.

NOTE--Some parts of this form are wider than one screen. To view

material that exceeds the width of this screen, use the right arrow

key. To return to the original screen, use the left arrow key.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

                I.    Procedural History and Issues Presented ................................... 357
                II.   Dismissal of the Land Grant Claims ........................................ 360
                      A.  Factual Background                                                      360
                      B.  The Spanish and Mexican Land Grant Claim                                362
                      C.  The Claim Under the Act of June 21, 1860                                365
                III.  Challenges to the Determination that Water Sought to be Withdrawn is        366
                        Tributary
                      A.  Whether the Trial Court Properly Determined the Effect of AWDI's        367
                            Proposed Pumping on Surface Streams
                      B.  Whether the Trial Court Properly Determined the Nature of the           368
                            Unconfined Aquifer and the Effect of AWDI's Proposed Pumping on that
                            Aquifer
                          1.  Challenge to Natural Stream Legislation as Special Legislation      370
                          2.  Inclusion of Unconfined Aquifer in Definition of Natural Stream
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
83 cases
  • City of Thornton v. Bijou Irr. Co.
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • October 15, 1996
    ...but derives from a separate legislatively-prescribed system based on ownership of the overlying lands. American Water Dev., Inc. v. City of Alamosa, 874 P.2d 352, 369 (Colo.), cert. den., 513 U.S. 1015, 115 S.Ct. 575, 130 L.Ed.2d 491 (1994). Because the 1953 decree essentially found no hydr......
  • In the Matter of Application for Water Rights of Park County Sportsmen's Ranch, LLP, Case No. 01SA412 (CO 2/14/2005)
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • February 14, 2005
    ...1987), Alamosa-La Jara Water Protection Ass'n v. Gould, 674 P.2d 914, 920 (Colo. 1983), and American Water Development, Inc. v. City of Alamosa, 874 P.2d 352, 368 (Colo. 1994)(hereinafter AWDI). In Kuiper, we merely observed that well-pumping may result in some reduction in evapotranspirati......
  • Sierra Club v. Dept. of Transp. of State
    • United States
    • Hawaii Supreme Court
    • March 16, 2009
    ...could meet the statutory criteria in the future and receive the same benefits provided by the statute); Am, Water Dev., Inc. v. City of Alamosa, 874 P.2d 352 (Colo.1994) (determining that Colorado's natural surface stream legislation was not special legislation despite only applying to two ......
  • City of Aurora v. Colorado State Engineer
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • January 18, 2005
    ...Alamosa-La Jara Water Users Protection Ass'n v. Gould, 674 P.2d 914, 920 (Colo.1983), and American Water Development, Inc. v. City of Alamosa, 874 P.2d 352, 368 (Colo.1994) (hereinafter AWDI). In Kuiper, we merely observed that well-pumping may result in some reduction in evapotranspiration......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Recovery of Attorney Fees and Costs in Colorado
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 23-9, September 1994
    • Invalid date
    ...Rodeo Cowboys, 832 P.2d 1099, 1102 (Colo.App. 1992). See also American Water Dev., Inc. v. Rio Grande Water Conservation Dist., 874 P.2d 352 (Colo. 1994)[ability of trial court to condition grant of voluntary dismissal on payment of costs and fees not limited by provisions of CRS § 13-17-10......
  • Recovering Actual Damages Under Colorado's Construction Defect Action Reform Act-part Ii
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 38-6, June 2009
    • Invalid date
    ...expenses may do "double duty" as "response costs" and "defense costs" under CERCLA). 36. Compare Am. Water Dev., Inc. v. City of Alamosa, 874 P.2d 352, 389 (Colo. 1994) (expert witness costs properly include all costs for the expert's opinion formulation and testimonial preparation), In re ......
  • The Bill of Costs
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 25-11, November 1996
    • Invalid date
    ...supra, note 7. 25. See Ballow v. PHICO Insurance Co., 878 P.2d 672, 684 (Colo. 1994); American Water Development, Inc. v. City of Alamosa, 874 P.2d 352, 388-390 (Colo.); but see Perkins v. Flatiron Structures Co., 849 P.2d 832 (Colo.App. 1992) (where it was unclear from the bills of the exp......
  • Disciplinary Opinion
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 42-2, February 2013
    • Invalid date
    ...is "void ab initio" because it was "made by the Florida Bar counsel (and not by a referee)." See Am. Water Dev., Inc. v. City of Alamosa, 874 P.2d 352, 376 (Colo. 1994) ("Adoption of a prevailing party’s proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law is not necessarily improper."); Elec. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT