American Zylonite Co. v. Celluloid Mfg. Co.

Decision Date14 December 1887
Citation32 F. 809
PartiesAMERICAN ZYLONITE CO. v. CELLULOID MANUF'G CO.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

E. M. Felt and H. M. Ruggles, for complainant.

Frederic H. Betts, for defendant.

COXE, J.

The ex parte entry in the rule-book was a nullity. A complainant in an equity action cannot in this manner discontinue the suit. An order of the court is necessary. Conner v. Drake, 1 Ohio St. 170. The right, however, of a complainant to dismiss a bill before hearing, where the defendant has acquired no substantive rights, is well nigh absolute. It must be an extraordinary case where the court refuses to exercise its discretion. Railroad Co. v. Rolling-Mill Co., 109 U.S. 702, 713, 3 S.Ct. 594; Stevens v. Railroads. 4 Fed.Rep. 97.

I have examined the defendant's record sufficiently to be convinced that there is nothing which particularly distinguishes this from other equity actions. It is asserted that the testimony relied upon to establish prior invention is of such a character that the defendant may be unable to procure it again, but the rights of the defendant will be protected in this regard if the complainant is compelled, as a condition of the discontinuance, to stipulate that the defendant's record may be used in any new suit which may be instituted against it by the complainant. Brush v. Condit, 22 Blatchf. 246, 20 F. 826.

Upon filing such a stipulation, and paying the costs, the action may be discontinued.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Young v. J. Samuels & Bro., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Rhode Island
    • April 6, 1916
    ... ... circuit: Brush v. Condit (C.C.) 20 F. 826; ... American Zylonite Co. v. Celluloid Mfg. Co. (C.C.) ... 32 F. 809; American Steel & ... ...
  • Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. S/S SHALOM
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • January 12, 1966
    ...same subject matter. See American Steel & Wire Co. v. Mayer & Englund Co., 123 F. 204 (C.C.S.D.N.Y.1903); American Zylonite Co. v. Celluloid Mfg. Co., 32 F. 809 (C.C.S.D.N.Y.1887); Brush v. Condit, 20 F. 826 (C.C.S.D.N.Y.1884), aff'd on other grounds, 132 U.S. 39, 10 S.Ct. 1, 33 L.Ed. 251 (......
  • Long v. Anderson
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 13, 1904
    ... ... R. R ... Co. v. Hendee (C. C.) 27 F. 678; Hat-Sweat Mfg. Co ... v. Waring (C. C.) 46 F. 87; Pullman's Palace Car ... Co. v. tral Transp. Co. (C. C.) 49 F. 261; ... Western Union Tel. Co. v. American Bell Tel. Co. (C ... C.) 50 F. 662; Hershberger v. Blewett (C. C.) ... 138, 18 S.Ct. 808, 43 L.Ed. 108. The case ... of American Zylonite Co. v. Celluloid Mfg. Co. (C ... C.) 32 F. 809, is very much in point ... ...
  • Jones v. Securities and Exchange Commission
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • November 4, 1935
    ...In re J. R. Palmenberg Sons, 76 F.(2d) 935 (C. C. A. 2); Young v. Southern Pac. Co., 25 F.(2d) 630 (C. C. A. 2); American Zylonite Co. v. Celluloid Mfg. Co. (C. C.) 32 F. 809. The commission's authority to subpœna the appellant and compel him to testify seems clear. Appellant advanced the u......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT