Ames v. Bd. of Educ. of Montclair
Decision Date | 02 January 1925 |
Parties | AMES v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MONTCLAIR et al. |
Court | New Jersey Court of Chancery |
Suit by William Whitney Ames against the Board of Education of Montclair and Wayne M. French for specific performance of contract to sell land. Bill dismissed.
Charles Jones, of Newark, for complainant.
Robert M. Boyd, Jr., of Montclair, and Theodore J. Badgley, of Newark, for defendants.
This bill is for the specific performance of a contract to sell land. The Montclair board of education, April 24, 1923, passed the following resolution:
"Mr. McKinney moved that this property [the land involved in this suit] be offered for sale at private sale to any purchaser who may offer at least the price of $20,260, and that it should be sold subject to restrictions and present incumbrances, and subject also to any liens for improvements that may have been made, and that the secretary be authorized to enter into a contract with any purchaser willing to pay that price on those terms and conditions, and that, after consulting with the town attorney as to the proper form of deed to be drawn, the president and secretary be authorized to draw up, execute, and deliver said deed."
The next day the complainant, at the instance of Union N. Bethell and his son Richard, submitted to the secretary of the board the following proposal, which was accepted:
Later the board rescinded the resolution, and sold the land to the defendant French for the same price, and, after this bill was filed, conveyed it to him. He took with notice.
The background of this action is a long and bitter struggle between Mr. Bethell, a member of the board, to retain the land for a school site, and a group of residents of Montclair who objected to a public school in their midst, in which village politics played no unimportant part. The group had the sympathy of three of the five members of the board and the strenuous opposition of Mr. Bethell, who consistently voted against all efforts to dispose of the land. On May 22nd, the group urged the board to reject Mr. Ames' contract, and a resolution was passed requesting him to withdraw. At this meeting Mr. Bethell partly disclosed his hand by submitting the following:
At a later meeting the solicitor of the board, to whom it had been referred, advised the board that he was of the opinion "that the whole proceeding is invalid, for the reason that the resolution passed by the board at the meeting of April 24th delegated to a ministerial officer, the secretary of the board, the duty of exercising a discretion in accepting a proposal for the Edgemont land," and also that, "if any member of the board (meaning, of course, Mr. Bethell) is interested directly or indirectly in the contract for the purchase...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jersey City v. Hague
...Schefbauer v. Board of Township Committee of Kearney, 57 N.J.L. 588, 601, 31 A. 454 (Sup.Ct.1895); Ames v. Board of Education of Montclair, 97 N.J.Eq. 60, 65, 127 A. 95 (Ch.1925); United States v. Thomas, 15 Wall. 337, 82 U.S. 337, 342, 21 L.Ed. 89, 91 (1873); Paschall v. Passmore, 15 Pa. 2......
-
Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.
...Schefbauer v. Board of Township Committee of Kearney, 57 N.J.L. 588, 601, 31 A. 454 (Sup.Ct.1895); Ames v. Board of Education of Montclair, 97 N.J.Eq. 60, 65, 127 A. 95 (Ch. 1925); United States v. Thomas, 15 Wall. 337, 82 U.S. 337, 342, 21 L.Ed. 89, 91 (1873); Paschall v. Passmore, 15 Pa. ......
-
Hochberg v. Borough of Freehold
...affairs calls for an exclusive fidelity, and a corroding self-interest vitiates the municipal action. Ames v. Board of Education of Montclair, 97 N.J.Eq. 60, 65, 127 A. 95 (Ch.1925); Rankin v. Board of Education of Egg Harbor, 135 N.J.L. 299, 303, 304, 51 A.2d 194 (E. & A.1947); Pyatt v. Ma......
-
Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.
...Am.Jur., sec. 260 and 261, pages 77 and 78. 'Public service demands an exclusive fidelity.' Ames v. Board of Education of Montclair, 97 N.J.Eq. 60, (Ch. 1925), at page 65, 127 A. 95, at page 97. Diligence, integrity and intelligent discretion in the discharge of their duties are required of......