Ames v. Orme
| Decision Date | 31 March 1859 |
| Citation | 28 Mo. 381 |
| Parties | AMES, Respondent, v. ORME, Appellant. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1. Judgment affirmed.
Appeal from St. Louis Law Commissioner's Court.
Goodlett, for appellant.
A. M. & S. H. Gardner, for respondent.
This case was tried under instructions to which each party assented, and upon testimony which was admitted without objection from either side. The dispute involved really no legal questions; but were questions of fact suitable for a jury, and as the jury have passed upon them, and the court has sanctioned their verdict, there is no ground for the interference of this court. Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Merkel v. Railway Mail Association
...passing upon the weight of the evidence. Nephler v. Woodward, 200 Mo. 179; Patton v. Fox, 179 Mo. 525; Walser v. Wear, 141 Mo. 443; Ames v. Arme, 28 Mo. 381; Strode v. Abbott, 102 Mo.App. 169. And in an action on an accident policy, plaintiff establishes a prima-facie case by proof of exter......
-
Crews v. Sikeston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
...and approved the finding of the jury in that respect. The presence of a mouse in the bottle is not an open question on this appeal. Ames v. Orme, 28 Mo. 381; Oakes v. Mound City Mutual Ins. Co., 52 Mo. 237; Reynolds v. Buffington, 75 Mo.App. 86; Strode v. Abbott, 102 Mo.App. 169, 76 S.W. Pl......
- St. Louis, Alton & Chicago R.R. Co v. Castello