Amos v. Taylor
Decision Date | 01 December 2020 |
Docket Number | NO. 4:20-CV-7-DMB-JMV,4:20-CV-7-DMB-JMV |
Parties | MICHAEL AMOS, et al. PLAINTIFFS v. TOMMY TAYLOR, et al. DEFENDANTS |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Mississippi |
Before the Court is "Plaintiffs' Opposed Motion to Compel Defendants' Responses to Expedited Discovery Requests Related to COVID-19 and for Sanctions." Doc. #172.
On January 28, 2020, thirty-three inmates at the Mississippi State Penitentiary at Parchman filed a "First Amended Class-Action Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial" against Tommy Taylor, in his official capacity as the Interim Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, and Marshal Turner, in his official capacity as the Superintendent of Parchman. Doc. #22. In their complaint, the plaintiffs allege that the defendants' policies and practices caused years of neglect at Parchman, which placed them in imminent danger of serious physical injury, in violation of the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment, as incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment. The pleading, which includes a proposed class action, seeks monetary and injunctive relief.
On March 16, 2020, the plaintiffs filed an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and mandatory preliminary injunction seeking an "order directing mandatory and affirmative action to safeguard Plaintiffs at Parchman from SARS-CoV-2, also known as, COVID-19." Doc. #59 at 1. Three days after the completion of expedited briefing, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a document titled, "Interim Guidance on Management of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Correctional and Detention Facilities." Based upon this guidance, the Court directed the parties to supplement their briefing. Doc. #70. The parties completed their supplemental briefing on April 15, 2020. See Docs. #74, #75.
On April 24, 2020, this Court denied the plaintiffs' request for preliminary injunctive relief, finding:
[T]he defendants have undoubtedly taken steps to address the risk of COVID-19 in Parchman. Such undisputed steps include the creation and updating of the [facility's pandemic] Plan, posting of signs, promulgation of quarantine and screening policies for both inmates and visitors, suspension of in-person visitation except for attorneys, implementing cleaning procedures in the housing units, the waiving of co-pays for inmates, limitations on transfers, and the provision of extra soap to inmates.
Doc. #79 at 18. In reaching these factual conclusions, the Court credited the affidavits of officials from MDOC and Centurion (MDOC's third-party healthcare provider). Id. at 2-13.
On August 11, 2020, the plaintiffs filed a motion for "expedited discovery focused on Defendants' compliance [with] the representations made to this Court [regarding COVID-19 precautions at the Mississippi State Penitentiary] and with public health guidelines and implementation of measures at Parchman to reduce spread and protect against COVID-19." Doc. #128 at 1. Specifically, the motion asked that "the Court enter an Order: (1) that service of Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and RFPs on Defendants' be deemed effective the date this Motion is granted; and (2) directing Defendants to respond to interrogatories and produce documents responsive to Plaintiffs' RFPs on an expedited basis - within five (5) to seven (7) days." Id. at 3.
On August 26, 2020, the Court granted the motion to the extent it sought leave to conduct expedited discovery and deem the requested discovery (eight interrogatories and eight requests for production) served as of the date of the order. Doc. #141 at 17. The Court required the defendants to respond to the discovery requests within fourteen days and authorized the plaintiffs to file "an appropriate motion to compel" if the defendants objected to discovery and the good faith requirements of Rule 37 were satisfied. Id.
Two months after the Court authorized discovery, the plaintiffs filed a motion to compel. Doc. #172. The motion to compel is fully briefed. Docs. #173, #177, #178.
As mentioned above, on August 26, 2020, the Court deemed the plaintiffs' requests for discovery (eight requests for production and eight interrogatories) served as of that date and directed the defendants to respond within fourteen days. The plaintiffs' proposed discovery seeks responses to the following interrogatories:
To continue reading
Request your trial