Amoskeag Bank v. Chagnon, 89-014
Decision Date | 11 April 1990 |
Docket Number | No. 89-014,89-014 |
Citation | 572 A.2d 1153,133 N.H. 11 |
Parties | AMOSKEAG BANK v. Regis J. CHAGNON d/b/a Manchester Mortgage Co., Brad Morrow d/b/a Morrow Millwork and Sundeen Lumber Company, Inc. |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Vincent J. Nardi and Elizabeth Cazden (orally), Manchester (Vincent J. Nardi and
Elizabeth Cazden, on the brief), for Regis J. Chagnon d/b/a Manchester Mortg. Co.
McSwiney, Jones, Semple & Douglas P.C., Concord (Ronna F. Wise orally, and George B. Waldron, Jr., on the brief), for Brad Morrow d/b/a Morrow Millwork.
Kfoury & Elliott P.A., Manchester (Charla Bizios Labbe, on the brief and orally), for Sundeen Lumber Co., Inc.
Scott A. Ewing, Manchester, for Amoskeag Bank, filed no brief.
This case involves the conflicting claims of three junior creditors, Regis J. Chagnon d/b/a Manchester Mortgage Co. (Manchester Mortgage), Brad Morrow d/b/a Morrow Millwork (Morrow), and Sundeen Lumber Company, Inc. (Sundeen), to the surplus funds of a mortgage sale. Amoskeag Bank filed a bill of interpleader with the superior court to determine the distribution of the surplus funds among the junior creditors. Manchester Mortgage appeals the December 12, 1988 decision of the Superior Court (Manias, J.), to distribute the surplus funds first to Morrow and then the balance to Sundeen, reserving no money for Manchester Mortgage. We affirm.
The lower court found the following facts:
The documents Manchester Mortgage actually recorded were: (1) the first page of a mortgage from Thomas Robinson Associates, Inc. (T.R.A.) to Manchester Mortgage, with a description of property on Knox Road in Bow; (2) the same page, re-typed; (3) the signature page of a promissory note, the maker being T.R.A.; and (4) the record of a corporate vote of T.R.A. authorizing the President "to borrow such sums as he sees fit to complete the construction project located on Knox Rd., Bow...." The mortgage's signature and acknowledgment page was not recorded. T.R.A. asserted no claim to these funds and is not a party to this proceeding.
The superior court ruled that neither Morrow nor Sundeen had actual or constructive notice of Manchester Mortgage's mortgage because it was so defectively recorded. Morrow adopts this reasoning on appeal. Manchester Mortgage, on the other hand, argues that: (1) Morrow had actual notice of the defectively recorded deed because it performed a title search and was obliged to inquire as to the validity of the deed; (2) Sundeen had constructive notice of the defectively recorded deed, and thus must be charged with notice of what it would have learned had it performed a title search; and (3) under the operation of constructive notice, Sundeen must be placed in Morrow's position and therefore was also obliged to inquire as to the validity of the deed. Sundeen agrees with Manchester Mortgage that what was disclosed by Morrow's title search obligated Morrow to inquire further, and thus put Morrow on notice of the existence of the mortgage. But since Sundeen did not perform a title search, Sundeen argues that the defective recording of the deed protects it from constructive or actual notice of the mortgage.
Although Morrow performed a title search and saw the defectively recorded mortgage, we hold that Morrow was not obligated to inquire further, since it was an attaching creditor, not a prospective bona fide purchaser.
The statutes applicable to this case are RSA 477:3-a and 477:7. RSA 477:3-a reads:
"Every deed or other conveyance of real estate and every court order or other instrument which affects title to any interest in real estate, except probate records and tax liens which are by law exempt from recording, shall be recorded at length in the registry of deeds for the county or counties in which the real estate lies and such deed, conveyance, court order or instrument shall not be effective as against bona fide purchasers for value until so recorded."
RSA 477:7 reads:
"No deed of bargain and sale, mortgage nor other conveyance of real estate, nor any lease for more than 7 years from the making thereof, shall be valid to hold the same against any person but the grantor and his heirs only, unless such deed or lease be attested, acknowledged and recorded, according to the provisions of this chapter."
New Hampshire is a "race-notice" jurisdiction. That is, a purchaser or creditor has the senior claim if he or she records without notice of a prior unrecorded interest. The purpose then of the recording statutes recited above is to provide notice to the public of a conveyance of or encumbrance on real estate. The statutes serve to protect both those who already have interests in land and those who would like to acquire such...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Servicing v. U.S., Civil No. 09–cv–191–JL.
...on cases dealing with unrecorded, or improperly recorded, mortgages and other encumbrances. See, e.g., Amoskeag Bank v. Chagnon, 133 N.H. 11, 16, 572 A.2d 1153 (1990) (holding that a judgment creditor, unlike a purchaser, does not take subject to a prior mortgage which has been improperly r......
-
Fortin v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
...admission, Fortin would have had constructive knowledge of the mortgage. New Hampshire is a "race-notice" jurisdiction. Amoskeag Bank v. Chagnon, 133 N.H. 11, 14 (1990). Accordingly, "all purchasers or creditors are held to be constructively notified of any properly recorded interest, wheth......
-
In re Chase, 07-10963-JMD.
...For purposes of perfecting liens and interests in real estate, New Hampshire is a "race-notice" jurisdiction. Amoskeag Bank v. Chagnon, 133 N.H. 11, 14, 572 A.2d 1153 (1990). In a race-notice a purchaser or creditor has the senior claim if he or she records without notice of a prior unrecor......
-
In re Beeman
...a race-notice jurisdiction. See id. The Debtors note that New Hampshire is also a race-notice jurisdiction. See Amoskeag Bank v. Chagnon, 133 N.H. 11, 14, 572 A.2d 1153 (1990). Thus, they argue that, under New Hampshire law, a BFP without notice has priority over a previous purchaser if the......
-
The Myths And Merits Of MERS - Part 2
...it lacks standing to attack them."). Jones, supra note 3, at 36. Jones, supra note 3, at 36, 38. Id. See Amoskeag Bank v. Chagnon, 572 A2d 1153, 1155 (N.H. 1990) ("The purpose then of the recording statutes...is to provide notice to the public of a conveyance of or encumbrance on real estat......