Anariba v. Dir. Hudson Cnty. Corr. Ctr.
| Decision Date | 03 November 2021 |
| Docket Number | No. 20-2633,20-2633 |
| Citation | 17 F.4th 434 |
| Parties | Angel Argueta ANARIBA, Appellant v. DIRECTOR HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
Dirauf v. Berger
...780 (3d Cir. 2001) (quotation marks and citation omitted)). "However, we review questions of law de novo." Anariba v. Dir. Hudson Cnty. Corr. Ctr., 17 F.4th 434, 439 (3d Cir. 2021).6 Defendants' complaints about two of the District Court's comments do not change the result. First, the Court......
-
Kavanaugh v. Thompson
... ... can produce the actual body.” Anariba v. Dir ... Hudson Cty. Corr. Ctr., 17 ... ...
-
Hoffman v. Warden Phila. FDC
...the District Court retains jurisdiction." Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 441 (2004); Argueta Anariba v. Dir. Hudson Cty. Corr. Ctr., 17 F.4th 434, 446 (3d Cir. 2021); cf. Barden v. Keohane, 921 F.2d 476, 477 n.1 (3d Cir. 1990). Relying on Fed. R. App. P. 23(a), Hoffman also argued that ......
-
Nkosi v. Warden FCI-Allenwood Low
...facility where the [individual] is being held.” See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 435 (2004); Anariba v. Dir. Hudson Cty. Corr. Ctr., 17 F.4th 434, 444 (3d Cir. 2021) (“The logic of this rule rests in an understanding that the warden . . . has day-to-day control over the prisoner and .......
Request a trial to view additional results