Anderson, In re, 55037

Decision Date22 February 1984
Docket NumberNo. 55037,55037
Citation447 So.2d 1275
PartiesIn re Inquiry Concerning Judge William ANDERSON.
CourtMississippi Supreme Court

Luther T. Brantley, III, Jackson, for Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance.

No brief filed for William Anderson.

Before BOWLING, PRATHER and ROBERTSON, JJ.

BOWLING, Justice, for the Court:

This cause is before the Court on recommendation of the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance made pursuant to Section 177A, of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890, as amended and Mississippi Code Annotated, Section 9-19-1, et seq. (1981).

A formal complaint was filed with the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance alleging (1) Judge Anderson received a filing fee of $7 from Gulf Finance Company on each of three occasions for the purpose of securing the issuance of a garnishment by Justice Anderson and that although the filing fee was paid to Justice Anderson, a garnishment was not issued and (2) Justice Anderson was serving as a Booneville City policeman at the same time he was serving as a duly elected Justice Court Judge and that this was constitutionally barred.

The members of the Commission on Judicial Performance conducted a full hearing on the charges and in its detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law, it found that Justice Anderson had not conformed to the canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct by receiving the funds and failing to issue the garnishment writs. For this offense the commission reprimanded Justice Anderson and recommended that this Court place a fine of $100 on Anderson.

The commission further found that Justice Anderson was in violation of the Judicial Code of Ethics by serving as a Booneville City policeman and a justice court judge at the same time.

We wish to commend the Commission on Judicial Performance and its organization under the amended Constitution and the laws passed by the legislature thereunder. Obviously, they have worked diligently and faithfully to improve the judicial system of this state. They are professional men, who give freely of their time and engage in sacrifices to perform their duty.

We take up the two charges against Justice Anderson in reverse order. We first discuss the question of whether or not a justice court judge may serve in that office and at the same time hold a job as a law enforcement official.

We hold that he cannot do so. It is elemental that a justice court judge is a member of the judicial branch of the government and police officers and other law enforcement officials are members of the executive branch. It is therefore inescapable that a person cannot be a part of both branches at the same time. Article I, Sections 1 and 2 of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890 clearly mandate that the above statement is correct. We recently have addressed this question in detail in the case of Alexander v. Allain, 441 So.2d 1329 (Miss.1983).

The record and briefs before this Court reveal that Justice Anderson is no longer serving as a Booneville city policeman. Nowhere in the Constitution or the statutes do we find where a justice court judge is prohibited from taking a part-time job outside his judicial office. We do not specifically address that question here. We deal only with the above stated question; that is, that he cannot engage in a part-time job as a law enforcement official. 1

We now discuss the complaint against Judge Anderson to the effect that he on three occasions during his first term in office, received a $7 filing fee to issue writs of garnishment and failed to do so. We carefully have studied the record and the testimony in the cause, and as stated by the Commission in its report to this Court, Justice Anderson, during the first part of his first term, did not familiarize himself sufficiently with the legal procedures of the office. The record shows without dispute that no part of the three filing fees for the garnishment writs requested by Gulf Finance Company was appropriated by Justice Anderson or placed in his personal account. They were placed in his justice court account and undisputedly by him would have been repaid to Gulf at any time on their request. In the meantime, Justice Anderson took action toward collecting the judgments or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Mississippi Judicial Performance Com'n v. Walker
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 27, 1990
    ... ...         In the case of In re [Lloyd] Anderson, 412 So.2d 743 (Miss.1982) this Court adopted the definitions of "willful misconduct and conduct prejudicial to the administration ... Page 1122 ... ...
  • MISSISSIPPI COM'N ON JUD. PERF. v. RR, 98-CC-00352-SCT.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 11, 1999
    ... ... Ishee, 627 So.2d 283, 289 (Miss.1993) (quoting In re Quick, 553 So.2d 522, 524 (Miss. 1989) (quoting In re Anderson, 412 So.2d 743, 745 (Miss.1982) (quoting In re Nowell, 293 N.C. 235, 237 S.E.2d 246, 255 (1977) ...         ¶ 47. The Commission ... ...
  • Myers v. City of McComb
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • October 5, 2006
    ... ... See In re Anderson, 447 So.2d 1275, 1277 (Miss. 1984) ( city policeman and justice court judge). Accordingly, we expressly overrule any language in prior opinions ... ...
  • Jordan v. Smith
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 5, 1996
    ... ... We have applied this doctrine at the local level. See In re Anderson, 447 So.2d 1275, 1276 (Miss.1984) (where the Court held that a justice court judge is a member of the judicial branch of the government and cannot ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT