Anderson v. Anderson

Decision Date05 January 1907
Docket Number14,842
PartiesNELS ANDERSON et al v. HILDA ANDERSON
CourtKansas Supreme Court

Decided January, 1907.

Error from Shawnee district court; ALSTON W. DANA, judge.

STATEMENT.

HILDA ANDERSON brought suit for the specific performance of an alleged written contract between Nels Palmlund and Cecelia Palmlund, his wife, both deceased, and plaintiff's parents, Pehr Anderson and Nella Anderson, by the terms of which the Palmlunds were to receive her into their home in all respects as their own child, and she was to be left all the property of which they died possessed.

Upon issues joined the cause was tried to the court. A decree was rendered holding plaintiff entitled to specific performance and to be the legal owner of all the property left by the Palmlunds. The defendants, Pehr Anderson, who is the father of plaintiff, and his brothers and a sister, who together constitute the heirs at law of Cecelia Palmlund, bring the cause here for review. The facts as found by the trial court with conclusions of law, follow:

"FINDINGS OF FACT.

"(1) Plaintiff was born in Sweden in the year 1865, and is a daughter of Pehr Anderson, one of the defendants herein, and his wife, Nella Anderson, and said Pehr Anderson and his codefendants, Nels Anderson, Magnus Anderson and Nellie Mathison, are full brothers and sisters of Cecelia Palmlund and are her only heirs at law, except defendants Edna Freeland, Hattie Linden and Carrie Linden, whose rights have been heretofore determined in this action.

"(2) Said Cecelia Palmlund and her husband, Nels Palmlund, were born in Sweden and continued to reside there until the year 1868, when they moved to Topeka, Kan., where they resided until their deaths. The said Nels and Magnus Anderson and Nellie Mathison came to this country from Sweden about the same time and prior to 1870; Nels and Magnus Anderson settled in Osage county, and Nellie Mathison in Leavenworth, and she moved to Topeka in about the year 1881.

"(3) Plaintiff was born in Sweden about three years before said Nels and Cecelia Palmlund left Sweden, they acting as God-father and God-mother to said plaintiff when she was christened, when she was given Mrs. Palmlund's name 'Cecelia,' and were much attached to plaintiff from her early childhood. She was the second child, having one sister by the name of Ellen, and a brother by the name of August.

"(4) In the fall of 1872, and prior to the bringing of said plaintiff to this country, said Nels and Cecelia Palmlund made and entered into a written contract with Pehr Anderson and Nella Anderson, the parents of plaintiff, whereby said parents agreed to part with plaintiff as their own child, and give her over to Nels and Cecelia Palmlund, promising and agreeing that if the parents of said plaintiff would send her from Sweden to Topeka, Kan., to live with them and become their child, they would receive her into their own home as their own child, would treat her in all respects as if she had been naturally born to them, rear, nurture and care for her and have her custody and services as their own child, and at their death give her all the property they died possessed of.

"(5) The aforesaid contract and agreement, entered into between Pehr Anderson and Nella Anderson, the parents of plaintiff of the one part, and said Nels Palmlund and Cecelia Palmlund of the other part, was in writing, and was evidenced by various letters and correspondence which passed between said Nels and Cecelia Palmlund and said Pehr and Nella Anderson, parents of plaintiff, prior to the time plaintiff was sent to Topeka, all of which letters were lost or destroyed long since.

"(6) Said plaintiff resided in Sweden with her parents until in the month of May, 1873, when she was by her parents delivered into the hands of one Martin J. Smith, a nephew of the Palmlunds, a native of Sweden, who was then returning from Sweden to this country, with instruction to him from plaintiff's parents to deliver said child to Nels Palmlund and Cecelia Palmlund, his wife, in Topeka, Kan. Said Martin J. Smith, while in Sweden, was provided with money by said Nels Palmlund and Cecelia Palmlund with which to pay for the transportation and expenses of the plaintiff to this country, and did bring plaintiff to Topeka, Kan., and deliver her, as instructed, to said Nels and Cecelia Palmlund, on May 25, 1873.

"(7) The name given said child, the plaintiff, by her natural parents, and by which she was christened and always known in Sweden, was Cecelia Anderson, and she always went by that name until she entered the home of Nels and Cecelia Palmlund in May, 1873, at which time her name was at once changed by Nels and Cecelia Palmlund to Hilda Palmlund, by which name she was always known and called in the home of the Palmlunds, in school and in this city and community until she was married in August, 1886, and the relation of parents and child continued in all respects between said Nels and Cecelia Palmlund and plaintiff at all times.

"(8) Plaintiff lived continuously and uninterruptedly and in the home of said Nels and Cecelia Palmlund from May 25, 1873, until her said marriage in August, 1886, and during all of said time she was an affectionate and obedient child, assisting in the general housework, milking the family cow, doing chores and discharging all the duties which an obedient child owes to its parents. The said Palmlunds held her out in the community and treated her in every respect as their own child, and plaintiff at all times addressed and treated them as her own parents. The plaintiff received in return the same care and affection which she would have been entitled to had the Palmlunds been her own parents, and she was taught to call Mr. Palmlund "father" and Mrs. Palmlund "mother," and did so call them.

"(9) When plaintiff was about 17 or 18 years old, at the suggestion of said Nels and Cecelia Palmlund, she learned and worked at dressmaking, and for a time while working at dressmaking (the evidence does not show how long) part of her earnings went for her clothes, and a part was given to Mrs. Palmlund, but plaintiff was not treated by the Palmlunds as a 'boarder,' or as one not a member of the family, and no account was kept of such earnings by them or by plaintiff.

"(10) After plaintiff was taken into the home of said Palmlunds her natural parents never in any manner exercised or attempted to exercise any care or control over her, nor had the custody of her at any time, nor in any manner contributed to her support or education. After plaintiff's natural parents came to Topeka to live plaintiff occasionally visited them, but never made her home with them, and she continued to reside with and make her home at the Palmlunds.

"(11) In the year 1886 plaintiff, when she was more than twenty-one years of age, was married, with the full consent of said Nels and Cecelia Palmlund, to her husband, Peter Anderson, with whom she now lives with her children. The evidence shows that the probate judge of Shawnee county wrote plaintiff's name in her marriage certificate as Cecelia Hilda Anderson.

"(12) Said contract and agreement, made and entered into between the parents of plaintiff and the said Nels and Cecelia Palmlund, has been fully and completely performed by the plaintiff and her parents, Pehr Anderson and Nella Anderson.

"(13) Said Nels Palmlund died testate on the 8th day of August, 1901, leaving all of his property by his will, which was duly probated, to his wife, Cecelia Palmlund; and said Cecelia Palmlund died intestate on the 24th day of February, 1903, leaving the property described in the pleadings filed in this action.

"(14) That one child was born to said Nels and Cecelia Palmlund, which died in infancy, several years before plaintiff came to this country, and one of the considerations which moved them to enter into the contract hereinbefore stated was their childless state when plaintiff came to them, and their promise and intention, often expressed, was to legally adopt plaintiff and make her their heir.

"(15) At the time this action was commenced Mrs. J. C. Morrison was the duly appointed, qualified and acting administratrix of the estate of Cecelia Palmlund, deceased, since which time she has resigned and been finally discharged as administratrix, and by and with the consent of all parties to this suit H. G. Larimer was then duly appointed and has qualified, and is now the duly acting administrator of said estate, and has been substituted as a defendant herein as administrator of said estate in lieu of said Mrs. J. C. Morrison, formerly administratrix as aforesaid.

"(16) That after plaintiff's marriage she continued to live in the city of Topeka, and made frequent visits to the home of said Nels and Cecelia Palmlund, looking after their comfort and performing such offices of love and affection as a child naturally would toward its parents.

"(17) During the winter of 1870-1871 Nels Anderson, Jr., a son of Nels Anderson, lived at the Palmlunds, and did chores for his board, and attended school. In 1885-1886 Anna Benton, a daughter of Magnus Anderson, also boarded at the Palmlunds and went to school, but there is no evidence to show the arrangement under which she lived there.

"(18) At the time plaintiff was brought to the home of the Palmlunds and prior thereto there was talk by plaintiff's natural parents and by the Palmlunds about the adoption of the plaintiff by the Palmlunds; but no adoption was ever had under the statutes of this state.

"(19) That subsequent to the arrival of plaintiff in this country Nellie Mathison paid the expenses of plaintiff's sister and brother to this country, and, in 1881, Nels Palmlund advanced expense money for plaintiff's father to come to this...

To continue reading

Request your trial
73 cases
  • Burdick v. Grimshaw
    • United States
    • New Jersey Court of Chancery
    • September 7, 1933
    ...271 Mo. 195, 195 S. W. 1024, L. R. A. 1917F, 692; Middleworth v. Ordway, 191 N. Y. 404, 84 N. E. 291; Anderson v. Anderson, 75 Kan. 117, 88 P. 743, 9 L. R. A. (N. S.) 229; Winne v. Winne, 166 N. Y. 263, 59 N. E. 832, 82 Am. St. Rep. 647; Doppmann v. Muller, 137 App. Div. 82, 114 N. Y. S. 62......
  • Nelson v. Nelson
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • April 17, 2009
    ...that recognize a constructive trust is a possible remedy for breach of a contract to will property. For example, in Anderson v. Anderson, 75 Kan. 117, 123, 88 P. 743 (1907), the court "`It is not claimed, of course, that any court has the power to compel a person to execute a last will and ......
  • Torgerson v. Hauge
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • July 21, 1916
    ... ... 308; Cooper v. Carlisle, 17 ... N.J.Eq. 529; Eyre v. Eyre, 19 N.J.Eq. 102; Green ... v. Richards, 23 N.J.Eq. 33; Dean v. Anderson, ... 34 N.J.Eq. 500; Haughwout v. Murphy, 22 N.J.Eq. 531 ...           ... OPINION ... [159 N.W. 7] ...           [34 ... ...
  • Shirk's Estate, In re
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • March 5, 1960
    ...foster parent. Its enforcement has no element of immorality or illegality and is not violative of public policy (Anderson v. Anderson, 75 Kan. 117, 88 P. 743, 9 L.R.A.,N.S., 229; Malaney v. Cameron, 98 Kan. 620, 159 P. 19, rehearings denied 99 Kan. 70, 161 P. 1180, 99 Kan. 424, 161 P. 1180,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT