Anderson v. Ashby
Decision Date | 16 May 2003 |
Citation | 873 So.2d 168 |
Parties | Michael J. ANDERSON et al. v. Mary Jean ASHBY, individually, and as personal representative of the estate of Jimmy Ashby, deceased. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Robert H. Rutherford, F.A. Flowers III, and Richard C. Keller of Burr & Forman, LLP, Birmingham, for appellants. B. Scott Shipman of Sherrill, Batts & Shipman, LLC, Athens, for appellee.
Michael J. Anderson, American General Finance, Inc., and Merit Life Insurance Company appeal from an order denying their motions to compel arbitration in an action filed against them in the Limestone Circuit Court by Mary Jean Ashby. We affirm.
On April 15, 1999, Mary Jean Ashby and Jimmy Ashby, her now-deceased husband, visited the American General Finance office located in Athens, Alabama,1 to obtain a $2,000 loan to be secured by their automobile. The loan was to be paid over a period of three years. Mr. Ashby indicated on the loan application that his only source of income was "disability" and "soc. sec."; Mrs. Ashby indicated on the loan application that her only source of income was "disability." According to Mrs. Ashby, Mr. Ashby wanted to obtain credit-life insurance so that she would not have to worry about the payments on the loan in the event something happened to him. It is undisputed that Mr. Ashby agreed to pay $827.10 in order to purchase $5,000 of credit-life insurance during the term of their three-year note.
While at American General Finance's office, the Ashbys met with Michael Anderson, the branch manager for American General Finance; Anderson is also an insurance agent for Merit Life Insurance Company, an affiliate of American General Finance. Mr. Anderson acknowledges that, as a result of doing business with the Ashbys, he knew that Mr. Ashby was unable to read and write and that he could not sign his own name. Anderson also admits that he knew Mrs. Ashby was limited in her reading ability.2
Mrs. Ashby claims that she and Mr. Ashby asked Anderson to explain the loan documents because they were unable to read and understand the documents. Additionally, the operating procedures of American General Finance applicable to customers who are blind or who cannot read require the company's representative to explain the documents to the customer before obtaining the customer's signature.
Anderson alleges that he explained the loan and credit-life insurance documents to the Ashbys. Anderson claims that, in accordance with American General Finance's operating procedures applicable to illiterate customers, he wrote at the bottom of each document involved in the loan transaction "THIS DOCUMENT EXPLAINED AND UNDERSTOOD BY THE BORROWER." According to Anderson, he then had the Ashbys sign the documents. Mrs. Ashby denies that the documents she executed bore any handwritten statements when she signed them.
The note and security agreement executed by the Ashbys on April 15, 1999, contained an arbitration agreement, which included the following provisions:
(Capitalization in original.) Above the signature line on the note and security agreement is written "THIS DOCUMENT EXPLAINED AND UNDERSTOOD BY THE BORROWER"; on the signature line is an "X," presumably Jimmy Ashby's mark, and Mrs. Ashby's signature.
Included with the application for credit-life insurance submitted to Merit Life Insurance by Jimmy Ashby on April 15, 1999, was a separate, stand-alone document, on which was printed another arbitration agreement.3 That arbitration agreement provided, in pertinent part:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Am. Bankers Ins. Co. of Fla. v. Tellis
...of their argument that the arbitration provision in their insurance policies is unconscionable, the policyholders cite Anderson v. Ashby, 873 So.2d 168 (Ala.2003), for the broad proposition that an arbitration provision is unconscionable when the terms of the provision are grossly favorable......
-
Bowater Inc. v. Zager
...later the appellant, of a Rule 59(e) motion asking the trial court to alter, amend, or vacate that order. Likewise, in Anderson v. Ashby, 873 So.2d 168 (Ala.2003), the Court denied the defendants' motion to compel arbitration on January 22, 2002, and on February 20, 2002, the defendants mov......
-
Exxon Mobil v. Ala. Dept. of Conservation
...to a material fact." In the context of fraud in events leading to the formation of a contract, this Court observed in Anderson v. Ashby, 873 So.2d 168, 181-82 (Ala.2003) (quoting Harold Allen's Mobile Home Factory Outlet, Inc. v. Early, 776 So.2d 777, 783 n. 6 "`See Rutter & Hendrix v. Hano......
-
Munoz v. Patel
...the allegations of fraud in the inception and fraudulent failure to perform state a cause of action for fraud."]; accord Anderson v. Ashby (Ala. 2003) 873 So.2d 168, 183 [" ‘Fraud in the factum is a traditional fraud’ "].) Those essential elements are, of course, " ‘ "(1) misrepresentation ......
-
Class Warfare: the Disappearance of Low-income Litigants from the Civil Docket
...to enforce the deal" (quoting Barnes v. N.H. Karting Ass'n, 509 A.2d 151, 154 (N.H. 1986)); id. at 1029 n.63 (citing Anderson v. Ashby, 873 So. 2d 168, 176 (Ala. 2003) (invalidating an arbitration provision partly because of an income/power disparity between the parties)). 122. See, e.g., W......