Anderson v. Dunn

CourtU.S. Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtJOHNSON
CitationAnderson v. Dunn, 6 Wheat. 204, 5 L.Ed. 242, 19 U.S. 204 (1821)
Decision Date02 March 1821
PartiesANDERSON v. DUNN

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
469 cases
  • Ashland Oil, Inc. v. FTC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • February 2, 1976
    ...portions of the Constitution.7McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135, 161, 47 S.Ct. 319, 71 L.Ed. 580 (1927); see also Anderson v. Dunn, 6 Wheat. (19 U.S.) 204, 5 L.Ed. 242 (1821); United States v. Rumely, 345 U.S. 41, 46, 73 S.Ct. 543, 97 L.Ed. 770 (1953). Absent such a power, a legislative bo......
  • State ex rel. Robinson v. Fluent
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • March 18, 1948
    ... ... to act during the session. In re Chapman, 166 U.S ... 661, 17 S.Ct. 677, 41 L.Ed. 1154; Anderson v. Dunn, 6 ... Wheat. 204, 5 L.Ed. 242; Ex parte Dalton, 44 Ohio St ... 142, 5 N.E. 136, 58 Am.Rep. 800. And there is no doubt that ... ...
  • People v. Maffett
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • July 18, 2001
    ...662-663, 255 N.W.2d 635 (1977); Gray v. Clerk of Common Pleas Court, 366 Mich. 588, 595, 115 N.W.2d 411 (1962); Anderson v. Dunn, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 204, 225, 5 L.Ed. 242 (1821). This implied judicial power includes the authority to regulate court procedure. See Jones v. Eastern Michigan Mot......
  • Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority Donovan v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, s. 82-1913
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • March 19, 1984
    ...state policies it favors and which ones it dislikes. "The science of government . . . is the science of experiment," Anderson v. Dunn, 6 Wheat. 204, 226, 5 L.Ed. 242 (1821), and the States cannot serve as laboratories for social and economic experiment, see New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 28......
  • Get Started for Free
19 books & journal articles
  • Comrades in Arms: Using the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act to Prosecute Civilian-Contractor Misconduct
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review No. 94-1, November 2008
    • November 1, 2008
    ...to the current language, see Toth, 350 U.S. at 13 n.2. [94] Toth, 350 U.S. at 23 (emphasis added). [95] Id. (quoting Anderson v. Dunn, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat.) 204, 230-31 (1821)). The Court later referred to this statement as the "Toth doctrine." McElroy v. United States ex rel. Guagliardo, 361 ......
  • Due process as separation of powers.
    • United States
    • Yale Law Journal Vol. 121 No. 7, May 2012
    • May 1, 2012
    ...power of the Senate to imprison a nonmember to coerce compliance with a subpoena to testify before a Senate committee); Anderson v. Dunn, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat.) 204 (1821) (upholding the power of the House to imprison a nonmember as punishment for (326.) 2 TUCKER'S BLACKSTONE, supra note 318, a......
  • THE NECESSARY AND PROPER INVESTIGATORY POWER.
    • United States
    • Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy Vol. 46 No. 2, March 2023
    • March 22, 2023
    ...LAWFARE (Nov. 4, 2018), https://www.lawfareblog.com/remembering-st-clairs-defeat [https://perma.cc/T4DRYJ75]. (61.) Anderson v. Dunn, 19 U.S. 204, 205 (62.) See id. at 225. (63.) See id. at 233. (64.) See id. at 230-31 (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted). (65.) Michael......
  • Congress, the Federal Courts, and Forum Non Conveniens: Friction on the Frontier of the Inherent Power
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review No. 91-3, March 2006
    • May 1, 2006
    ...necessary to the exercise of all others.'" (quoting United States v. Hudson, 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 32, 34 (1812))); Anderson v. Dunn, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat.) 204, 226-27 (1821) (discussing courts' inherent [94] See Pushaw, supra note 28, at 855-56. As a general matter, the notion of a limited inher......
  • Get Started for Free