Anderson v. Dunn

Decision Date02 March 1821
Citation6 Wheat. 204,5 L.Ed. 242,19 U.S. 204
PartiesANDERSON v. DUNN
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
466 cases
  • Ashland Oil, Inc. v. FTC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • February 2, 1976
    ...portions of the Constitution.7McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135, 161, 47 S.Ct. 319, 71 L.Ed. 580 (1927); see also Anderson v. Dunn, 6 Wheat. (19 U.S.) 204, 5 L.Ed. 242 (1821); United States v. Rumely, 345 U.S. 41, 46, 73 S.Ct. 543, 97 L.Ed. 770 (1953). Absent such a power, a legislative bo......
  • State ex rel. Robinson v. Fluent
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • March 18, 1948
    ... ... to act during the session. In re Chapman, 166 U.S ... 661, 17 S.Ct. 677, 41 L.Ed. 1154; Anderson v. Dunn, 6 ... Wheat. 204, 5 L.Ed. 242; Ex parte Dalton, 44 Ohio St ... 142, 5 N.E. 136, 58 Am.Rep. 800. And there is no doubt that ... ...
  • People v. Maffett
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • July 18, 2001
    ...662-663, 255 N.W.2d 635 (1977); Gray v. Clerk of Common Pleas Court, 366 Mich. 588, 595, 115 N.W.2d 411 (1962); Anderson v. Dunn, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 204, 225, 5 L.Ed. 242 (1821). This implied judicial power includes the authority to regulate court procedure. See Jones v. Eastern Michigan Mot......
  • Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority Donovan v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, s. 82-1913
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • March 19, 1984
    ...state policies it favors and which ones it dislikes. "The science of government . . . is the science of experiment," Anderson v. Dunn, 6 Wheat. 204, 226, 5 L.Ed. 242 (1821), and the States cannot serve as laboratories for social and economic experiment, see New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 28......
  • Get Started for Free
7 books & journal articles
  • 2.9 Appellate Review of Sanction Awards
    • United States
    • Virginia CLE Attorney Fees and Sanctions - Virginia and Federal Courts (Virginia CLE) Chapter 2 Sanctions by Virginia Courts
    • Invalid date
    ...184 Va. 855, 859, 36 S.E.2d 529, 530 (1946).[211] Harris v. United States, 382 U.S. 162, 165 (1965) (quoting Anderson v. Dunn, 19 U.S. 204, 231 (1821)).[212] SeeBroudy, Contempt: The Court's Inherent Enforcement Power, Virginia Lawyer (2012) (citing Va. Const. Art. IV -14 (2011)); Yoder v. ......
  • The Pierced Privilege: Challenges to How Congress Vitiates the Attorney-Client Privilege
    • United States
    • Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics No. 35-4, October 2022
    • October 1, 2022
    ...(1957). 12. See id . 13. See, e.g. , Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 (1935); Marshall v. Gordon, 243 U.S. 521 (1917); Anderson v. Dunn, 19 U.S. 204 (1821). 14. Anderson , 19 U.S. at 231. 15. Id. 16. Hamilton et. al., supra note 9, at 1133. 17. 2 U.S.C. § 194. 18. 2 U.S.C. § 194; see also......
  • Populism, free speech, and the rule of law: the "fully informed" jury movement and its implications.
    • United States
    • Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Vol. 88 No. 1, September 1997
    • September 22, 1997
    ...have the inherent power "to impose silence, respect, and decorum . . ." and submission to their lawful mandates (quoting Anderson v. Dunn, 19 U.S. 204, 227 (146) See Zal v. Steppe, 968 F.2d 924, 931 (9th Cir. 1992) (Trott, J., concurring) ("a lawyer properly functioning as such on behalf of......
  • THE NECESSARY AND PROPER INVESTIGATORY POWER.
    • United States
    • Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy Vol. 46 No. 2, March 2023
    • March 22, 2023
    ...LAWFARE (Nov. 4, 2018), https://www.lawfareblog.com/remembering-st-clairs-defeat [https://perma.cc/T4DRYJ75]. (61.) Anderson v. Dunn, 19 U.S. 204, 205 (62.) See id. at 225. (63.) See id. at 233. (64.) See id. at 230-31 (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted). (65.) Michael......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT