Anderson v. Foshee
Decision Date | 14 April 1927 |
Docket Number | 3 Div. 766 |
Citation | 216 Ala. 78,112 So. 356 |
Parties | ANDERSON v. FOSHEE et al. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; Leon McCord, Judge.
Action by I.O. Anderson against W.E. Foshee and W.S. Foshee. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Ball & Ball, of Montgomery, for appellant.
Hill Hill, Whiting, Thomas & Rives, of Montgomery, for appellees.
Count 3 of the complaint fails to show that these defendants are liable to plaintiff under their indemnity contract, as shown by Exhibit C. Defendants' undertaking was not to pay all debts and obligations of the Foshee Lumber Company, but only to see that none of them became a lien or charge on the property purchased by plaintiff from the lumber company, and to hold plaintiff harmless against such of those debts as were or became liens, incumbrances, or charges upon it. The count alleges the existence of a debt due from the lumber company to the Western Railway of Alabama, and that plaintiff was compelled to pay it; but it does not show that the debt had become, or would or could become a lien on any of the property intended to be protected. Several grounds of the demurrer aptly point out this defect, and the demurrer was therefore properly sustained.
Under count 6 of the complaint, plaintiff could make proof of his entire case as fully and completely as he could have done under counts 4 and 5, and hence the elimination of the latter counts on demurrer was not prejudicial to plaintiff and cannot work a reversal of the judgment. Bice v. Steverson, 205 Ala. 576, 88 So. 753.
We find no prejudicial error, and the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial