Anderson v. Johnson Lighterage Co.(In re Appeal of State Indus. Comm'n)

Citation224 N.Y. 539,120 N.E. 55
PartiesANDERSON v. JOHNSON LIGHTERAGE CO. et al. Appeal of STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION.
Decision Date04 June 1918
CourtNew York Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Claim under the Workmen's Compensation Law (Consol. Laws, c. 67), by Louis Anderson against the Johnson Lighterage Company, employer, and the Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, Limited, insurance carrier. From an order of the Appellate Division (182 App. Div. 152,169 N. Y. Supp. 645) reversing a determination of the State Industrial Commission and dismissing the claim, the State Industrial Commission appeals. Affirmed.

Cuddeback, Hogan, and Cardozo, JJ., dissenting.

Merton E. Lewis, Atty. Gen. (E. C. Aiken, of Albany, of counsel), for appellant.

Bertrand L. Pettigrew, of New York City, for respondents.

McLAUGHLIN, J.

The claimant, at the time he was injured, was a longshoreman in the employ of the Johnson Lighterage Company, which had a contract to load a vessel in navigable waters. While thus engaged he sustained an injury by slipping on a pier from which the cargo was being taken. He made a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Law, and the Industrial Commission allowed the same. Its award was reversed by the Appellate Division, the claim dismissed, and the commission appeals to this court

In my opinion, for the reasons stated by me in Matter of Doey v. Howland Co., Inc., 120 N. E. 53, decided herewith, Anderson, at the time he was injured, was engaged in performing a maritime contract. The Industrial Commission therefore had no jurisdiction to make the award; it was properly vacated by the Appellate Division, and the claim dismissed.

The order of the Appellate Division therefore should be affirmed, with costs against the State Industrial Commission.HISCOCK, C. J., and CHASE and COLLIN, JJ., concur. CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, and CARDOZO, JJ., dissent.

Order affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State Industrial Commission of State of New York v. Nordenholt Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 29 Mayo 1922
    ...Upon authority of Matter of Keator v. Rock Plaster Manufacturing Co., 224 N. Y. 540, 120 N. E. 56, and Matter of Anderson v. Johnson Lighterage Co., 224 N. Y. 539, 120 N. E. 55, the Appellate Division reversed the award (Insana v. Nordenholt Corporation, 195 App. Div. 913, 185 N. Y. Supp. 9......
  • State, Ex Rel., v. Duffy
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 16 Junio 1925
    ... ... Indus- [113 Ohio St. 108] trial Accident Comm., 177 ... 30, 120 N. E., 53, followed in ... Anderson v. Johnson Lighterage Co., 224 N.Y. 539, 120 N ... ...
  • Doey v. Clarence P. Howland Co.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 4 Junio 1918
    ... ... HOWLAND CO., Inc., et al.Appeal of STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION.Court of Appeals ... ...
  • Spaminato v. Bay Transp. Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 1 Julio 1969
    ... ...         Appeal is taken by an employer and its insurance carrier ... nothing to the contrary in Matter of Anderson v. Johnson Lighterage Co., 214 App.Div. 743, 209 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT