Anderson v. State
| Decision Date | 12 August 1997 |
| Docket Number | CR-96-0161 |
| Citation | 710 So.2d 491 |
| Parties | Clifford Dean ANDERSON v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Clifford Dean Anderson, pro se.
Bill Pryor, atty. gen., and Jack W. Willis, asst. atty. gen., for appellee. On Application for Rehearing
PATTERSON, Retired Appellate Judge.
The unpublished memorandum of February 28, 1997, is withdrawn, and this opinion is substituted therefor.
The appellant, Clifford Dean Anderson, appeals from the Franklin Circuit Court's summary denial of his Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition in which he contested his incarceration resulting from 1979 convictions for second-degree burglary for which he was sentenced to concurrent sentences of five years' imprisonment. In that petition, Anderson asserts that he is being held in custody after his sentences have expired; he alleges that his present incarceration is pursuant to a fugitive warrant and detainer that are invalid because, he says, they were issued after his sentences had expired. He presents the following chronology to support his argument:
May 5, 1980--He started serving his concurrent five-year sentences.
January 8, 1981--An employee of the Franklin County Sheriff's department transported him from the county jail to Riverchase Memorial Hospital and left him unguarded.
January 9, 1981--Hospital personnel discharged him and told him that he was free to go.
October 31, 1985--He was returned to the custody of Alabama authorities and placed in the Jefferson County jail. He was scheduled to testify in a federal trial and during his two-week stay, he talked to FBI agents and to Franklin County law enforcement authorities. 1 After he testified, he was returned to the custody of the state of Kentucky and was paroled in Kentucky in July 1986. No warrant or detainer was filed with the Kentucky authorities by the Alabama authorities.
May 2, 1987--He was arrested in Huntsville, Tennessee, and was incarcerated in the Scott County, Tennessee, jail. In the Fall of 1987, he pleaded guilty to the charges and was sentenced to 15 years.
June 25, 1987--The Alabama Department of Corrections issued a fugitive warrant on Anderson for failure to complete his concurrent five-year sentences. A detainer was not filed at this time with the Tennessee authorities. Anderson claimed that had one been filed, he could have returned to complete his sentence or answer the information.
September 1990--Anderson was transferred from the custody of the Tennessee Department of Corrections to the custody of the state of Kentucky for violation of his 1986 parole. No detainer had been filed with the Tennessee authorities by Alabama. He was released from Kentucky's custody in December 1991. Again, no detainer had been filed.
May 5, 1993--While he was in the custody of the North Carolina Department of Corrections, the Alabama Department of Corrections filed a fugitive warrant based on his "escape." Sometime in May 1993, he received oral notice from North Carolina authorities that the Alabama authorities had filed a detainer against him for escape.
February 9, 1994--He was informed that he was not wanted for escape, but was wanted for the completion of his five-year sentences.
These facts, he alleges, show that from January 9, 1981, until May 5, 1993, neither he nor any state having custody of him at various times during this period had any indication that he was wanted by Alabama authorities. He further asserts that the Alabama authorities had several opportunities to know of his whereabouts and/or to file a proper warrant or detainer.
These allegations raise the question whether Anderson has been credited with the proper time toward his five-year sentences. However, it is well established that a Rule 32 petition is not the proper procedure by which to review such a question: a petition for writ of habeas corpus is the proper vehicle. Taunton v. State, 562 So.2d 614 (Ala.Cr.App.1989), cert. denied, 562 So.2d 615 (Ala.1990). Section 15-21-6, Code of Alabama 1975, requires that a habeas corpus petition be addressed to and filed in the circuit court nearest the inmate's place of incarceration. We reiterated in Ex parte Henley, 675 So.2d 557 (Ala.Cr.App.1996), that the circuit court of the county in which the inmate was incarcerated when he filed his habeas corpus petition retains jurisdiction over the matter even if the inmate is transferred to another correctional facility in a different county. Thus, jurisdiction for determining this question is properly in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, although Anderson was subsequently moved to a facility in Barbour County. The Franklin Circuit Court's dismissal of Anderson's petition for lack of merit is void because that court had no jurisdiction over the merits of the petition.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tyler v. Houston
...v. McDonald, 120 F.2d 962 (10th Cir.1941). 43. Hunter, supra n. 41, 159 F.2d at 862-63 (emphasis supplied). See, also, Anderson v. State, 710 So.2d 491 (Ala.Crim.App.1997). 44. Hayward v. U.S. Parole Com'n, 740 F.2d 610 (8th 45. See Hayward v. U.S. Parole Commission, 502 F.Supp. 1007 (D.Min......
-
Owens v. State
...credit against his sentence for the time he was at liberty. Giles v. State, 462 So.2d 1063, 1064 (Ala.Cr.App.1985); Anderson v. State, 710 So.2d 491 (Ala.Cr.App.1997). Likewise, a probationer who violates the conditions of his probation and avoids arrest cannot be rewarded by "crediting" th......
-
Hartley v. State
...been construed to mean that the petition must be filed in the county in which the inmate is incarcerated. See, e.g., Anderson v. State, 710 So.2d 491 (Ala.Crim.App.1997). ...