Anderson v. State
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | MORRISON |
| Citation | Anderson v. State, 406 S.W.2d 433 (Tex. Crim. App. 1966) |
| Decision Date | 22 June 1966 |
| Docket Number | No. 39630,39630 |
| Parties | Paul ANDERSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
Herbert Green, Jr., Dallas, for appellant.
Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., Robert H. Stinson, Jr., Harryette Bercu, Curtis Glover and W. John Allison, Jr., Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
OPINION ON STATE'S MOTION FOR REHEARING
Our prior opinion is withdrawn and the following substituted in lieu thereof.
The offense is the attempt to pass as true a forged instrument; the punishment, three years.
Defendant entered a plea of guilty and filed his application for suspended sentence. Trial was had before a jury on August 26, 1965, and notice of appeal was given September 24, 1965.
The evidence adduced by the State revealed that appellant approached witness Perry, an employee of the White's Humpty Dumpty Food Store, at the store office and filled out a customer draft. The appellant then sought to have witness Perry cash it, showing him a driver's license. Witness Perry refused to cash the check, whereupon appellant departed with the customer draft.
Officer Pinkston was called to the Humpty Dumpty and subsequently arrested appellant. Upon searching the appellant's person, a customer draft was found which was identified by witness...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Ansley v. State
...to the search or fruits thereof were made, no error is shown. McLaughlin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 426 S.W.2d 244; Anderson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 406 S.W.2d 433; Gonzales v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 379 S.W.2d 352; Cert. den. 380 U.S. 981, 85 S.Ct. 1346,14 L.Ed.2d 274; Beeler v. State, Tex.Cr.App.......
-
Mortier v. State, 46392
...1968): '(O)jections to a search are waived when fruits of the search are introduced without objections.' See also, Anderson v. State, 406 S.W.2d 433, 434 (Tex.Cr.App., 1966); Burns v. State, 172 Tex.Cr. 112, 353 S.W.2d 860, 861 (Tex.Cr.App., Having reviewed the record and finding no reversi......