Anderson v. United States, 17018.
| Decision Date | 09 May 1958 |
| Docket Number | No. 17018.,17018. |
| Citation | 255 F.2d 96 |
| Parties | James Lorden ANDERSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
John E. Banks, Asst. U. S. Atty., Russell B. Wine, U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.
The only question raised on this appeal is as to the admissibility of evidence that was obtained by the arresting officers as the result of what appellant calls his "unlawful arrest."
The narcotics, as to which this motion to suppress was made, were found in appellant's motel room only after he had identified himself as its occupant and after he had given the officers permission to search the room. No arrest was made until after the narcotics and other paraphernalia were thus found in appellant's possession. The court did not err in refusing to suppress the evidence.
The judgment is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Page
...to ours); United States v. Burgos, 2 Cir., 1959, 269 F.2d 763; United States v. Sclafani, 2 Cir., 1959, 265 F. 2d 408; Anderson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 255 F.2d 96; Gatterdam v. United States, 6 Cir., 1925, 5 F.2d 673; Windsor v. United States, 6 Cir., 1923, 286 F. 51; Schutte v. Un......
-
United States v. Strouth
...objection to the admission of the evidence so obtained. See Commonwealth v. Wright, 411 Pa. 81, 190 A.2d 709 (1963); Anderson v. United States, 5 Cir., 255 F. 2d 96 (1938). * * Commonwealth v. Waughtel (1964), 204 Pa.Super. 40, 201 A.2d 217, 218 1-3. The thrust of the defendant Strouth's ar......
-
Com. v. Price
...objection to the admission of the evidence so obtained. See Commonwealth v. Wright, 411 Pa. 81, 190 A.2d 709 (1963); Anderson v. United States, 5 Cir., 255 F.2d 96 (1958);' Commonwealth v. Waughtel, 204 Pa.Super. 40, 42, 201 A.2d 217, 218 As a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitutio......
-
Anderson v. Settle
...States Code; his 12 year sentence; the affirmance of his conviction by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Anderson v. United States (5th Cir., 1958), 255 F.2d 96, cert. den. 358 U.S. 845, 79 S.Ct. 69, 3 L.Ed.2d 79 (1958); his Section 2255 motion in the committing court; Judge Ric......